Saturday, September 4, 2021

“The Tragedy at Buffalo”: Reflections on McKinley’s Assassination

William McKinley was the third U.S. President to be assassinated—in just 36 years (plus a few months). He was shot 120 years ago on September 6 and died eight days later. What was behind that tragic event?  

Pres. McKinley shot on 9/6/1901

The Making of Pres. McKinley

William McKinley, Jr., was born in Ohio in January 1843. When he was still 18, he enlisted as a private in the Civil War—and 36 years later became the last President to have fought in that horrendous war.

Mustered out of the army in 1865, McKinley was elected to the U.S. House of Representatives just eleven years later. After six terms in the House, he served as the Governor of Ohio for two two-year terms.

In the presidential election of 1896, Republican McKinley defeated Democrat / Populist William Jennings Bryan and became the 25th POTUS. Four years later, he was re-elected by defeating Bryan for the second time with 51.6% of the popular vote, up slightly from 1896.

McKinley’s election was due, in large part, to the financial support he received from the wealthy industrialists of the country. Bryan was the “commoner,” who had the support of the working class but with limited resources. The moneyed class won the elections for McKinley.

In his classic bestselling book, A People’s History of the United States (1980; rev. ed., 2003), Howard Zinn wrote that in 1896 “the corporations and the press mobilized” for McKinley “in the first massive use of money in an election campaign” (p. 295).

McKinley’s Presidency

McKinley’s support by the wealthy paid good returns for them. Early in the second year of his presidency, the U.S. went to war with Spain.

Three years before McKinley’s re-election in 1900 with Theodore Roosevelt as the Vice-President, the latter wrote to a friend, “I should welcome any war, for I think this country needs one.” And, indeed, that very next year (1898) the Spanish-American War began, and Roosevelt was a hero in it.

John Jay, McKinley’s Secretary of State, called it "a splendid little war," partly because it propelled the United States into a world power—with world markets. Indeed, under McKinley’s presidency in 1898, the American Empire emerged.*

Zinn quotes the (in)famous Emma Goldman writing a few years later that “the lives, blood, and money of the American people were used to protect the interests of the American capitalists” (p. 321).**

Indeed, the “military-industrial complex” was a reality far before Pres. Eisenhower used that term sixty years ago in January 1961.

Shortly after the brief war with Spain ended, the Philippine-American War started in February 1899 and was still in progress when McKinley was shot and killed.

McKinley’s Assassination

Leon Czolgosz was a Polish-American who, by the time he was 28 years old, believed, probably for good reason, that there was a great injustice in American society, an inequality that allowed the wealthy to enrich themselves by exploiting the poor.

Early in September 1901, Czolgosz traveled from Michigan to Buffalo, New York, where the President was attending the Pan-American Exposition (a World’s Fair). There he shot McKinley twice at point-blank range.

Czolgosz had clearly been influenced by the fiery, anarchist rhetoric of Goldman (1869~1940). But just as Nat Turner had misused the words of the Bible (see my 8/25 blog post), he misused the words of Goldman, who advocated dramatic social change, but not violence.

Even before McKinley died on Sept. 12, Goldman was arrested and charged with conspiracy. She denied any direct connection with the assassin and was released two weeks later. On Oct. 6 she wrote a powerful essay titled “The Tragedy at Buffalo.”

Goldman stated clearly, “I do not advocate violence,” but wrote in forceful opposition to “economic slavery, social superiority, inequality, exploitation, and war.” And she concluded that her heart went out to Czolgosz “in deep sympathy, and to all the victims of a system of inequality.”

At the end of October, Czolgosz was executed by electric chair—and Goldman continued advocating for the people Czolgosz cared about so deeply and sought to help in an extremely misguided manner.

_____

* “American Empire, 1898~2018,” my 1/15/18 blog post, elaborates this matter.

** Zinn wrote “Emma,” a play about Goldman that was first performed in 1977. I found Zinn’s play quite informative and of considerable interest. 

13 comments:

  1. Thanks, Leroy, for this interesting piece of history.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, Anton, for reading it. -- I wonder what you have read/heard about Emma Goldman and if you'd like to say a bit about your impressions of her.

      Delete
  2. Thanks again Leroy for your Excellent History lesson.
    Why can't we Ever learn from History?
    Your longtime Friend,
    John Tim Carr

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for reading and commenting, John Tim.

      I'm afraid that most people get old too soon and smart too late.

      Delete
  3. Here are helpful comments from Thinking Friend Eric Dollard in Chicago:

    "Thanks, Leroy, for your comments about the McKinley assassination and Emma Goldman.

    Assassins are usually those seeking revenge or those seeking to transform society. Those seeking to transform society, as was the case with Leon Czolgosz, are often delusional since their assassinations rarely actually affect their societies. Some assassinations do, however, have disastrous effects such as the assassination of the Archduke Ferdinand in 1914, which started WWI.

    "Lincoln was shot by a Southern sympathizer, probably out of revenge for the defeat of the Confederacy, and Garfield was shot by a disgruntled office seeker. Oswald may have shot Kennedy out of revenge for Kennedy's policies toward Cuba, but the assassination had no effect on those policies. The assassination of McKinley may had some effect as Teddy Roosevelt, who was himself shot in the chest during his 1912 presidential campaign, was more of a reformer than McKinley.

    "These presidential assassinations and attempted assassinations underscores America's penchant for violence and firearms. How many other nations had to fight a war to end slavery? Haiti? How many British prime ministers have been assassinated in 400 years? One, Spencer Perceval, in 1812. The last British monarch to die violently was Charles I, who was beheaded in 1649.

    "Emma Goldman led a very tough life, but she was a very tough woman. Her fierce independence and dedication to social justice has to be admired."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for your informative comments, Eric. I appreciate all the information you shared, some of it about things I did not know. I am happy when I can learn new things from my Thinking Friends.

      I think the only Prime Minister assassinated in Japan was PM Inukai in 1932. His assassination was by young naval officers who were in the movement to help the military become the governing power in Japan. 

      Delete
  4. I had never heard of Emma Goldman, and I minored in History in college. Like so much of our history, Emma's story is better left untold by the corporate interests that still rule the U.S.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Charles, for posting your comments.

      J. Edgar Hoover once called Goldman “the most dangerous woman in America.” (Mother Jones, 1837-1930, had been called the same thing; I posted an article about Jones on Nov. 30, 2020; here is the link to that post:
      https://theviewfromthisseat.blogspot.com/2020/11/learning-from-indomitable-mother-jones.html)

      For the same reason that racists don't want Critical Race Theory taught in public schools, or even in colleges, capitalists don't want the thought and activities of people like Goodman (or Jones)--Critical Economic Theory?--to be taught either.

      Delete
  5. Leroy:
    The thought that history is a selective recording process is disturbing, but an existential reality which is better learned in early life. I was a history minor in college but I can never recall being taught about how written histories are formed and the role of perception in its recording.
    I really didn't respond to your blog, but rather to Charles Kiker's comments to your blog. It struck me as rather profound. Thanks always!

    Truett Baker

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Truett, for your comments.

      Please see my response to Charles Kiker. (Just like you, he went to a Baptist Seminary--Southern in Louisville, in his case--and is about your age.)

      Just as in teaching about race, what is taught about history (what is included in the history textbooks) is often skewed by the ideological/political stance of the authors--and that is why, putting the two together, Blacks (and others) have insisted on "Black history" being included in school curricula.

      Delete
  6. Well, the main thing I know about McKinley is that GM now manufactures a Denali, but no McKinley. I guess there is no honor among thieves. Denali, of course, is the name Obama gave to Mt. McKinley in 2015, since that was the indigenous name (meaning "the big one" in the local language).

    My Sunday school class read "White Trash" by Nancy Isenberg, and we all were surprised to find out how many times all of us had been miseducated by the Jim Crow propaganda still circulating after the efforts of the Daughters of the Confederacy to teach America the "lost cause" slant on the Civil War. The most startling discovery for me was that Georgia did not start out as just another penal colony, but on the contrary, was originally a utopian experiment lead by James Oglethorpe who designed an almost slave-free haven for poor whites, where they would not have to compete with slave labor (In 1732). By 1750, pro-slavery politics lifted the ban on slavery and plantations, and within a few years plantations ruled the state. All that was left was for the Daughters of the Confederacy to erase James Oglethorpe and his experiment from history.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, as always, for your helpful comments, Craig!

      I knew that Mt. McKinley has for several years now been known as Mt. Denali--but I didn't know that GMC is now producing luxury SUVs under the name Yukon Denali. And I was shocked to see the starting price for a new Denali is about $70,000!

      It is sad that so much important U.S. history is not taught, or is taught in a "revisionist" form. For that reason, I appreciate Howard Zinn's book "A People's History of the United States."

      Delete
  7. This is another of your articles for which I am extremely grateful. The names mentioned and the comments reaffirm an old slogan, "The victors write the history." It is regrettable we can go through many years of formal education and learn so little about what has formed us. In a very apolitical question I ask, how can we teach history with integrity and include all the forces and dynamics that have shaped the current status? To offer courses emphasizing the different strands, such as black history or indigenous nations history, does not mean everyone will take them. We study what we are forced to study or toward which we are drawn. Prejudice and the tools to fight it both begin at home. Will we ever see a generation that does that? BTW three cheers for the name change for Mt. Denali! Will we see the same happen for Pike's Peak renamed Tava (Sun) Mountain (Ute) or Devil's Tower renamed Bear's Lodge (Lakota)? My prejudice is showing.

    ReplyDelete