The news media and the internet have been awash with news and opinions about the tragic murder of Charlie Kirk last week. I was amazed that his assassination garnered such wide coverage. Earlier this year, he talked about the current “assassination culture,” a topic worth analyzing.
There
should be grief first and criticism later. On the day of
Kirk’s killing, some spoke negatively of him. But on that afternoon
of September 10, I posted words of Doug Pagitt on my Facebook page.*
Pagitt
wrote, "I am outraged by the horrific assassination of Charlie Kirk, and
my heartfelt prayers are with him and his family. Political violence has no
place in America.”
He
went on to say, "Charlie Kirk and I disagreed on nearly everything when it
came to politics, but disagreement belongs in the realm of ideas, debate, and
voting, not in acts of harm.”
One
of my good friends posted negative things about Kirk on Facebook not long after
he was murdered, and I “scolded” him for doing that so soon after his
assassination. As I said to my friend, I fully agreed with what Pagitt wrote
that day.
I
also disapproved of others on the political left who were quick to say harsh
things about Kirk, even though they were true. I am surprised, though, that
according to Copilot, Pagitt has not publicly mentioned Kirk since 9/10.
Perhaps
he noted how many who spoke out against what Kirk had said through the years,
and especially recently, were chastised and even fired from public positions
for doing so.
Ironically, Kirk was a staunch advocate of free speech, but many who used
that freedom to say negative things about him were punished for what they
said/wrote—and apparently some even for publicizing what Kirk himself had said.
“Both
sides” need to be analyzed accurately. Despite Kirk accusing the left of
fostering an assassination culture, it seems clear that in recent decades, far
more violent acts have been committed by right-wing advocates than by those on
the left. I asked Copilot about this, and here is its response:
While figures like Charlie Kirk and Donald Trump have pointed fingers at the political left for fostering what they call “assassination culture,” there’s a substantial body of evidence showing that far-right rhetoric and behavior have significantly contributed to the escalation of political violence in the U.S.”
And
here is what Claude, my AI “buddy” reports: “The data shows
that while Charlie Kirk uses the term 'assassination culture' to
criticize the left, the statistical evidence suggests that far-right extremists
have been responsible for significantly more political violence and deaths
since 2000.”
Claude
goes on to say, “The disparity is quite stark - far-right extremists have
committed over 6 times more deaths (520+ vs 78) and nearly 5.5 times more
incidents (227 vs 42) than far-left extremists since 1990, with this trend
continuing into recent years.”**
Take
a look once again at the graph after the introductory paragraph at the top.
Beware
of being misled by the Vice President or intimidated by the right-wing
media. On Monday, filling in for Kirk on his regular program, VP Vance spoke
about “festering violence on the far left.” He also reportedly said on Fox
News that the accused assassin was “radicalized by the far left, by the social
networks of the far left, by the ideas of the far left.”
Two
days after her husband’s assassination, Erika Kirk said, “The evildoers
responsible for my husband's assassination have no idea what they have done.
They killed Charlie ….”
Gary
Bauer, a well-known conservative evangelical, wrote on Thursday, Erika’s “use
of the words ‘evildoers’ (plural) and ‘they’ was intentional. She was referring
to the radical leftists who hated her husband, who smeared her husband, and who
did everything they could to dehumanize him.”
But
at this point, from what we know about Tyler Robinson, the alleged assassin of Kirk,
he is not affiliated with
any political party, and there is no evidence linking him to any organized
leftist group or movement.
So, in analyzing the assassination culture that Kirk saw as defining the left, it seems
much more likely to be a characteristic of the right, which was emphasized so
much by Kirk and his organization, Turning Point USA.
_____
*
Doug Pagitt (b. 1966) launched
Vote Common Good with a 31-city bus tour that began on October 2, 2018. On Oct.
14, I drove over to Overland Park, Kansas, to hear him speak and to chat with
him briefly. Six days later, I posted a blog article about him and Vote Common
Good (see here).
** In the next paragraph, Claude went on to say, “This data comes from multiple credible sources, including the National Institute of Justice, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), the Anti-Defamation League, and academic research published in peer-reviewed journals.”
After receiving the above information, I saw this article with similar content on Time magazine’s website: “Trump Called for a Crackdown on the ‘Radical Left.’ But Right-Wing Extremists Are Responsible for More Political Violence.” The graph included in the article is what I posted above.
