It has been two weeks now since the historic meeting
between DJT and Kim Jong-un in Singapore. You likely heard/saw much about that
at the time. What can we say now about that meeting, which is surely one of the
ironies of American history? (“Irony” as used here means “a state of affairs or an event that
seems deliberately contrary to what one expects.")
The Irony of American History
The noted theologian Reinhold Niebuhr (about whom I
wrote in a June 2017 article) gave two lectures
at Westminster College in Missouri in May 1949. Those talks became the basis of
his book The Irony of American History
(1952).
Rather than try to summarize Niebuhr’s book here (which
cannot be done briefly), let me just refer to “What
You Can Learn from Reinhold Niebuhr,” a review article that appeared in the
March 26, 2009, issue of The New York Review of Books.
This article is about two events that have happened
since Niebuhr’s book was published. It is, however, partly about two countries
that have embraced Communism, the focus of Niebuhr’s reflections.
Nixon’s Visit to
China
Richard Nixon, the only POTUS to resign, is primarily known
for two things: the Watergate affair that led to his resignation and his visit
to China leading to the normalizing of relations between the U.S. and that
country.
Nixon’s strategic visit to China was twenty years after
Niebuhr’s book was published, but that visit is surely one of the ironies of
American history. Nixon was chosen to run as Eisenhower’s Vice-President partly
because of his strong anti-Communism stance.
Nixon, though, became the first U.S. President to visit
the People’s Republic of China, and that visit ended 25 years of no diplomatic
ties between the two counties.
For several reasons, Nixon can be seen as one of the
worst Presidents in U. S. history. But his visit to China was a highly
important strategic and diplomatic achievement—and part of the irony is that if
Humphrey had been elected in 1968, he likely would not have been able to pull
off that feat.
It is also ironic that that successful political action
occurred just four months before the Watergate break-in, which, of course, led
to Nixon’s resignation.
The Trump-Kim
Meeting
So, what about the historic meeting of the current POTUS
and Kim Jong-un, the Supreme Leader of the People’s Democratic Republic of
Korea?
One ironic aspect of that June 11/12 meeting comes from
the saber-rattling rhetoric and derogatory language used by both leaders
against each other just a few months earlier.
Trump publicly called Kim “Little Rocket
Man” and in private with his aides referred to Kim as “a crazy guy.” Kim, in
turn, has called Trump a “mentally deranged U.S. dotard.” At the Singapore
Summit, however, Trump and Kim appeared to be bosom buddies.
As was widely reported, Trump “gushed with
praise” of the North Korean dictator. But that was not highly regarded by some
Americans, including David A. Graham who wrote a June 12 article for
The Atlantic titled “Trump’s Effusive, Unsettling Flattery of Kim Jong Un”.
But others lauded DJT. On June 14, Deroy
Murdock wrote in the National Review (here), “President
Trump’s extraordinary Tuesday-morning Singapore summit with North Korean
dictator Kim Jong-un was an encounter that eluded every American president from
Eisenhower to Obama.”
Who’d have thought that the President who last
year threatened “fire and fury” and early this year bragged to Kim, “My nuclear
button is bigger than yours,” would be the one to meet with the Supreme Leader
of North Korea and come away claiming that there is no longer any threat of
nuclear confrontation?
Ironic indeed!