The Rachel Maddow Show is my favorite non-sports TV program.
Actually, I don’t watch TV much except for a few athletic contests, such as now some of the Chiefs’ games (which are
pretty hard to watch this year) and most of the Missouri University
Tigers’ football and basketball games—and the Rachel Maddow Show (maybe about a third of
the time, including watching some of it online the following day ).
For you who may not know, Rachel Maddow (b. 1973) earned a
degree in public policy from Stanford in 1994. She received a Rhodes
Scholarship which led to her earning a Doctor of Philosophy in politics from
Oxford University in 2001. Since 2008 she has hosted “The Rachel Maddow Show”
five nights a week on MSNBC.
Earlier this year when I heard about Rachel’s (or should I
say Dr. Maddow’s?) new book, Drift: The Unmooring of American Military Power, I wasn’t
immediately inclined to read it. But because it was Rachel’s book, I decided to
take a look at it. I found it quite well done—and quite important.
In the first chapter, Rachel cites Thomas Jefferson, who in
1792 wrote,
“One of my favorite ideas is, never to
keep an unnecessary soldier,” and seven years later he declared that he was “not for a standing army in a time of peace”
(cited on p. 9). Throughout her book Rachel points out how greatly this country
has drifted away from that idea, which was long upheld in the U.S.
“Stupid Regulations” (words spoken by Ronald Reagan) is the
title of the fifth chapter, and early in that chapter Rachel writes, “Every Congress is meddlesome, disinclined
toward war, and obstructive of a president’s desire for it—on purpose” (p. 96).
But, largely due to the Iran-Contra scandal (remember that?) and the work of
Ollie North (remember him?) things changed greatly.
Among other things,
North solicited funds for the National Endowment for the Preservation of
Liberty and operated a “mirror image” of the CIA’s secret support to the
Contras. “But unlike the CIA, which had to depend on money from Congress, this
privately funded entity had added value: the privatization of Reagan’s foreign
policy initiative turned out to be just the ticket for evading all those
barriers the legislature had erected. (Stupid regulations!)” (p. 112).
In his written
dissent to the congressional investigation of the Iran-Contra affair, Dick
Cheney insisted that “Reagan was right to
defy Congress, because there was nothing in Congress, nothing anywhere in
America’s political structure, that could constrain a president from waging any
war he wanted, however he wanted” (p. 124).
Thus, “By 9/11, the war-making authority in the
United States had become, for all intents and purposes, uncontested and
unilateral: one man’s decision to make” (p. 125).
There is much more
I would like to share from Rachel’s Drift.
But I will close with just a couple of items from Rachel’s “to-do list” for
the country:
Going to war, being at war, should be painful for the entire country, from the start. Henceforth, when we ship the troops off to battle, let’s pay for it. . . . Whenever we start a new one, we should raise the money to pay for it, contemporaneously. . . .
Let’s do away with the secret military. If we are going to use drones to vaporize people in Pakistan and Yemen and Somalia, the Air Force should operate those drones, and pull the trigger (p. 249).
Soon I plan to
write about how this country keeps droning on.
.jpg)