As most of you know, I am a big admirer of the Christian group known as the Bruderhof and am a regular reader of Plough Quarterly, their excellent publication. However, I have both appreciation for and some serious questions about their Summer 2022 issue titled Hope in Apocalypse.
“Hoping for Doomsday”
Peter Mommsen, the great-grandson of Eberhard Arnold
(1913~82) who was the founder of the Bruderhof, is the able editor of Plough
Quarterly. I have often been helpfully informed and challenged by his
perceptive editorials.
I was dissatisfied, though, with his six-page editorial in
the current issue of Plough. It is titled, “Hoping for Doomsday: The times
are troubled. That’s why we need the promise of apocalypse.”
While Mommsen writes some about the possible disastrous effects
of climate change, he seems to think that it is less a threat to humanity than the
potential destruction of earthly life as we know it because of nuclear war.
After briefly looking at those two
apocalyptic threats, he writes,
one day homo sapiens will go extinct, with or without our help through carbon emissions or nuclear war, and the game will be over. At least that is what current scientific models foretell. Perhaps it will be at the next round of global glaciation, predicted in a hundred millennia or so . . . .
What he goes on to say in that paragraph is what I learned
in the 1960s. But, and this was my dissatisfaction, he makes no reference to
what some scientists (and others) have said in recent years about ecological overshoot.
In passing, Mommsen does mention Don’t Look Up! the movie
I wrote about in my Jan. 25 blog post (see
here), but he makes no reference at all to the frightening phenomenon of
overshoot.
Ecological overshoot occurs when human demands exceed what
the earth’s biosphere can provide through its capacity for renewal. According
to some ecological scientists, the industrial world is nearing the overshoot apex
and will soon begin to collapse, an irreversible phenomenon.
For a good introduction to this matter, see Michael Dowd’s
video Overshoot in a
Nutshell: Understanding Our Predicament and also YouTube talks (such as this one)
by William Rees, professor emeritus of British Columbia University. These
articulate what some scientistic models are now foretelling.
(Rees, b. 1943, is primarily known for creating the ecological
footprint concept. Wikipedia, here, gives a good,
brief introduction to Rees and his academic work.)
Mommsen’s failure to make any reference to the concept of
ecological overshoot and the work of thinkers such as Dowd and Rees is a major
deficiency in his editorial.
Why is Overshoot Overlooked?
A main reason is doubtlessly unawareness. In spite of
valiant efforts by Dowd, Rees, and others to warn us of the perils of
overshoot/collapse, there is little public awareness of that real and present
danger.
My “Google alert” for overshoot in recent weeks has yielded surprisingly
few “hits.” There are some pertinent articles found at EcoWatch (such as here),
but these important essays are read by relatively few people.
Most, I’m afraid, don’t know (and don’t care?) about what is
likely to happen before the end of the present century.
But some are aware (to varying degrees) of overshoot but
find the idea unbearable. Some who do know at least something about
overshoot just don’t want to think about it, because it is too upsetting to
consider.
Perhaps a major reason overshoot is overlooked by many,
especially serious Christian thinkers such as Mommsen, is that the possibility
of such is unthinkable.
Earlier this year, Brian McLaren’s new book Do I Stay
Christian? was published. While he does not say a lot about overshoot, he
does mention the concept and makes a passing reference to Michael Dowd.
The seventh chapter of McLaren’s scintillating book deals with
“Christianity’s great wall of bias, which includes the “tendency to reject anything
that doesn’t fit in with our current understanding, paradigm, belief system, or
worldview” (p. 67).
Perhaps this helps us understand Mommsen’s lack of serious
attention to overshoot.
Much more needs to be said about this—and I plan to write at
least a little more about it soon.
