Perhaps few of you know the name Francis Bellamy, but all of you USAmericans know well the Pledge of Allegiance, which he wrote in 1892. Bellamy died 90 years ago on August 28.
Bellamy’s Beliefs
Francis Bellamy was born
in May 1855, the son of a Baptist minister in New York. After graduating from the
University of Rochester and further study at Rochester Theological Seminary, in
1879 Francis was ordained as a minister and became pastor of First Baptist
Church of Little Falls, New York.
Before his 30th
birthday, Bellamy moved to Boston, becoming pastor of Dearborn Street Baptist
Church. After serving five years there, in 1890 he accepted a call to Boston’s
Bethany Baptist Church. But the next year, under pressure, he resigned from that
pastorate and left the ministry.
There was tension in
the church because of Pastor Bellamy’s political views. In 1889 the Society of
Christian Socialists was founded in Boston, and Bellamy was elected to serve as
the Society’s vice president. He also wrote for their newspaper, The Dawn.
In the May 1890
issue of that paper, Bellamy urged pastors to become Christian Socialists,
defining Christian socialism as “the science of the Golden Rule applied to
economic relations.”**
It must be noted that the last decades of the 19th
century was the time of the “robber barons,” a pejorative term typically
applied to businessmen who used abusive practices to amass their wealth.” It
was a time of bad working conditions for many, child labor, and other exploitative
practices.
Provisions such as Social Security and laws restricting the
employment and abuse of child workers were not enacted until the 1930s, after
Bellamy’s death—but had he lived a few years longer, he no doubt would have
been delighted with such “socialistic” advances.
Bellamy’s Pledge
After leaving the pastorate, Bellamy took a job with Youth’s
Companion, a Boston-based family magazine with half a million subscribers.
As part of the promotion of the World’s Columbian Exposition to be held in October 1892 in commemoration of the 400th anniversary of Columbus reaching the Americas—and to bolster the schoolhouse flag movement that Youth’s Companion fervently supported, Bellamy wrote this pledge:
I pledge Allegiance to my Flag and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation indivisible, with Liberty and Justice for all.
Over thirty years later, my flag was changed to the
flag of the United States of America. That change was made largely to make
it clear to immigrant children what flag they were saluting.
The words under God were not added until 1954, sixty-two
years after the Pledge was written by an ordained minister without those words.
As Baptist historian (and Thinking Friend) Bruce Gourley has explained, Bellamy’s
text “intentionally reflected the Baptist heritage of church-state separation.”
Bellamy’s Pledge Now
As I have written previously, as a Christian I am not a fan
of any Pledge of Allegiance to a flag or a nation. (You can read what I wrote
about that in my 7/5/14
blog post, which has had nearly 1,200 “pageviews.”)
Apart from that, how can we USAmericans affirm that our
country is “indivisible.” There seems to be greater polarity (political divisiveness)
now than at any time since the Civil War, which ended 27 years before Bellamy
wrote the Pledge.
Inexplicably, last week all 212 Republican members of the
U.S. House of Representatives voted against the John Lewis Voting Rights
Advancement Act legislation.
So, not only is there great division among lawmakers, there
also seems to be opposition to providing “Liberty and Justice for all.” Among
other things, liberty and justice for all surely must make it possible for full
voting rights for all citizens.
_____
**
Content in the last two paragraphs was taken from Brian Kaylor, “The
Baptist Socialist Who Left God Out of the Pledge” (Word&Way, Aug.
24, 2020).
The first comments received this morning were from Thinking Friend Andrew Bolton in England, where it was already just past noon:
ReplyDelete"Thanks for today’s blog on the Pledge of Allegiance. Very interesting to read its history and the Baptist nuance. One of my favourite quotes is the following:
Thomas Helwys, the first English Baptist, said the following on religious liberty:
"'Men's religion to God is betwixt God and themselves; the king shall not answer for it, neither may the king be judge between God and man. Let them be heretics, Turks, Jews or whatsoever, it appertains not to the earthly powers to punish them in the least measure.'('Mistery of Iniquity, London,' 1612, page iii)
"Helwys got put in prison by the king for this and died there.
"I took a modified oath of allegiance when I became a US citizen in 2002 – I would serve in a national emergency only under civilian, not military direction.
"Perhaps the present pledge of allegiance becomes more bearable if we add ‘with economic and human rights justice for all.’
"I liked hearing about the social gospel commitment of Frances Bellamy.
"Thank you for another informative blog, Leroy!"
Thanks, Andrew, for your informative comments. I appreciate you citing Thomas Helwys, whom Francis Bellamy likely knew about.
DeleteI also like your suggestions that the Pledge include the words "with economic and human rights justice for all," but I am afraid that there are strong capitalistic and racist interests in the U.S. that tend to hinder greater economic justice and civil rights.
Your blog today reinforces my despair about this country, my friend. By the way, early in the 20th century, the William Jewell sociology department was offering courses in Christian socialism.
ReplyDeleteHere's my recommended version for replacing the Pledge: I pledge allegiance to the principles for which this flag waves: nations of democracy and human rights, forever under the judgment of God, striving for liberty and justice for all peoples.
Or a more inclusive version:
I pledge allegiance to the principles for which this flag waves: nations of democracy and human rights, forever striving for liberty and justice for all peoples.
I did not know but was not surprised to hear that WJC offered courses in Christian socialism early in the 20th century. As you know, some of the most prominent Protestant theologians in the first half of that century were socialists--and I am thinking, for example, of Karl Barth, Paul Tillich, and Reinhold Niebuhr.
DeleteI like the sentiment of your suggested re-wording of the Pledge, but, as you would likely agree, I see no possibility of such a change being made in my lifetime--or yours. I think the best hope we have is to keep advocating/explaining the meaning and ramifications of "liberty and justice for all."
Here are strong comments from Thinking Friend Glenn Hinson in Kentucky:
ReplyDelete"Good. Informative and challenging, Leroy. I agree with your perspective on our current political polarization, which is cause for great anxiety about the future of our republic. Republicans no longer understand how democracy works and are hostile to it."
Thanks for your comments, Dr. Hinson. While your concluding sentence certainly seems to apply to the current Republican U.S. Senators and Representatives, I would like to think that many "ordinary" people who are Republicans do understand democracy and will, in the long run, work to preserve it.
DeleteThis morning I also received the following comments from Thinking Friend Eric Dollard in Chicago:
ReplyDelete"Thanks, Leroy, for your comments about the Pledge. I am also not a fan of it as it strikes me as trite and smacks of cheap patriotism. In addition, since the terms used in the Pledge are not defined, one can read anything into it. I refuse to recite it.
"My first allegiance is to a set of moral and political principles, some of which are reflected in the Bill of Rights, and only secondarily to our nation. America has unevenly applied the Bill of Rights, generally consistently for wealthy white males, but less so for others. As for allegiance to a flag, that makes no sense.
"Reverend Bellamy meant well and he should still be commended for his principles."
Thanks for commenting, Eric. I appreciate you including the last sentence--but even at that, it seems he did not state his principles as clearly or as forcefully as he would have liked, knowing that there would be too much pushback.
DeleteSo the author of the pledge was a socialist. That's a bit of trivia that I might bring up when in the presence of patriots who use the pledge as a divisive test of loyalty. I think the story of the acceptable posture while saying the pledge also has an interesting history. As explained in this article from the Smithsonian Magazine it was originally suggested that the right hand be raised in a manner that we now think of as the Nazi salute.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Clif, for posting your comments. Yes, the facts do cause a problem for those who are pro-Pledge and anti-socialist, as so many "patriots" are now.
DeleteI found the article in the Smithsonian magazine quite interesting when I read it in my research in preparation for writing my article--and the change in the "salute" was especially interesting.
I learned an alternative way of reciting the Pledge of Allegiance when an African American friend from our congregation died a few months ago. At his memorial service, I learned that as a youth he came up with a different ending, one that was realistic for how things really are. His version for the last phrase was "indivisible, with liberty and justice for almost everyone." I can't hear the pledge now without thinking about that ending.
ReplyDeleteThanks for sharing this, Karen. I hadn't heard of anyone using that ending, but I agree that it is realistic. From the time of the Declaration of Independence, written long before the Pledge, the White men who governed this country had a limited and insufficient understanding of the words "all men."
DeletePledges are one small part of the world of identity statements. All of them are problematic, some of them of unavoidable, and none of them can avoid evolving in meaning over time. Think of the twists and turns in philosophies of USAmerican Constitution interpretation. As a contract between people, something of the sort is unavoidable. Still, almost every word and phrase have been fought over. For instance, the Second Amendment has evolved from "well-ordered militia" protecting "the people" to an almost unlimited individual right to bear arms of such destructive power that they would have been unimaginable to the framers of the Constitution.
ReplyDeleteThere is a person in my extended family who attended a church school of one denomination while worshiping with a slightly different denomination. So this person had to go to catechism class both places simultaneously, and learn two slightly different catechisms, each of which needed to be recited correctly at the correct building. I am not sure that resulted in the gospel lesson Jesus would have taught, especially to a tween!
Then there is the Star-Spangled Banner. The third verse reads, in part: "No refuge could save the hireling and slave/From the terror of flight or the gloom of the grave,/And the star-spangled banner in triumph doth wave/O’er the land of the free and the home of the brave." This is the American National Anthem. But what else could we sing, American the Beautiful?
Here are comments received yesterday afternoon from Thinking Friend Virginia Belk in New Mexico:
ReplyDelete"I remember well when in 1954, we at Barkadaro Elementary School were taught the new pledge with the two words, 'under God,' added. As an elementary teacher on the Navajo reservation under the auspices of the State of Arizona, I was required to lead/teach the pledge of allegiance to the US flag each morning. I thought little about it until I had a Jehovah's Witness first grader who refused to stand and say the pledge, nor even stand respectfully as the rest of us said the pledge. I had him stand just outside the classroom door in the hallway for the brief ritual.
"After I moved to Albuquerque and was teaching in a city elementary school, a father of one little girl explained to me in eloquent Spanish about Jehovah's Witness stance on taking oaths. I suggested his daughter stand outside the door but it was an exterior door, where cold or heat or rain or strangers might endanger the child. Papa suggested, she sit respectfully at her desk; I agreed.
"Again, I hardly thought about the significance of the oath until after I married Fred and he spoke of the 'flag worship' he saw in the oath. You and he are right, of course! Thankfully, I no longer have to lead youngsters in SB VBS nor in elementary school...
I found the story of the author of the original pledge interesting and somewhat tragic in his dismissal from his pastorate. I am thankful that in our Presbyterian church, I do not have to stare at the two flags flanking a baptistry nor a communion table each Sunday. They were distracting!"
Thank you for sharing these pertinent comments, Virginia!
DeleteI know well what you mean about SB (Southern Baptist) VBS, and I am embarrassed that I did not become aware sooner of the impropriety of pledging allegiance to the U.S flag at the beginning of Bible School every day for two weeks.
I am glad you don't have an American flag in your Presbyterian church, but I am happy to say that in the 15 years since we moved to Liberty in our "retirement," the American flag has not been displayed in the two churches we have been members of, even though Second Baptist Church long was a Southern Baptist church. And you may remember from when you and Fred went with June and me to Rainbow Mennonite Church a couple of years ago, there was no flag there either.
Allegiance is a strong word. I cannot give my unconditioned allegiance to a piece of cloth and the republic for which it stands, whether at a public event (ball game, etc) or a religious event.
ReplyDeleteThanks for refreshing us on the history of the pledge, and its author. I knew he was a pastor. Didn't know he got kicked out of his church. He was a man before his time.
Thanks, Charles, for posting your comments; it was good to hear from you again!
Delete