Who
was born on February 12, 1809? Yes, Abraham Lincoln was born on that day—and so
was Charles Darwin. Lincoln is 15th on the list of “The 25 Most
Influential People of All Time” (see here). Darwin is #9 on that
same list, largely because of On the Origin of Species by Means of
Natural Selection, his revolutionary book published 160 years ago, on
November 24, 1859.
Darwin’s
Discoveries
Born
about 175 miles northwest of London, from 1825 to 1831 Darwin studied medicine at the University of Edinburgh
and then went to the University of Cambridge to study for an ordinary degree, the usual preliminary
for theological training.
Rather than becoming a medical doctor or a
clergyman, though, Darwin became a natural scientist, and his voyage on HMS Beagle
(1831~36) established him as an eminent geologist.
Based on his meticulous scientific research, by
the end of that decade he had mostly constructed his theory of evolution,
although his seminal book on that was not published until 20 years later.
On the Origin of Species led to a revolution in the way human beings thought about the
world and themselves. As a 1999
essay in the Scientific American says, “Almost every component in modern man’s belief system is
somehow affected by Darwinian principles.”
Darwin’s
Detractors
From
the beginning until the present, however, Darwin has had his distractors. In
the years following the publishing of his groundbreaking book, there were
scientists who did not agree with his assertions.
By the 1870s, though, the scientific community and most of the educated public had accepted evolution as a
fact.
The
main detractors have been Christians whose belief in a literally interpreted
Bible caused them to oppose evolution of the natural world, including humans. One
of the contemporary evangelical Christian leaders of this opposition to Darwin
was Phillip E. Johnson (b. 1940), who died last month.
Darwin
on Trial (1991)
was Johnson’s influential book widely read and cited by conservative Christians.
Darwin’s
Defense
Since
I am not a scientist, I have no way to authenticate Darwin’s scientific
assertions. As a student of Christian theology and philosophy, I can (and will)
offer a limited defense of Darwin.
I
suppose there was a time when I did not accept Darwin’s theory of evolution as
being correct—but even though I grew up in a conservative Baptist church, I
don’t remember that ever being a live issue.
I
also don’t know when it was that I first accepted evolution as being “true,”
but by the time I had finished my seminary and graduate school courses/seminars
under Dr. Eric C. Rust, my major professor, I no longer had any qualms about
affirming the truth of evolution.
Because
of Dr. Rust, who was a trained scientist as well as a theologian, I accepted a
both/and position with regards to science and religion rather than an either/or
position. That meant accepting both evolution and divine creation—and a rejecting
both Darwinism and creationism.
The
importance of that position became abundantly apparent when I began teaching
Christian Studies to non-Christian students in Japan. Almost without exception,
the students had been taught evolution in high school and believed it to be
scientifically true.
Of
the (literally) thousands of non-Christian students I taught, if presented the
choice between science (evolution) or Christianity based on a literal
interpretation of the Genesis creation stories, 99% or so would most likely have
quickly chosen science.
I
was happy to be able to emphasize that such a choice is not necessary. It was
only in my last years in Japan that I was able to augment my assertions with
the writings of Catholic theologian John Haught of Georgetown University.
Haught’s
books God After Darwin: A
Theology of Evolution (2000)
and Deeper Than Darwin (2003) are highly significant books for theologically
evaluating evolution. I highly recommend them.
.jpg)