Tuesday, October 20, 2020

The Peril of Blind Allegiance

Theirs not to make reply,
Theirs not to reason why,
Theirs but to do and die.

I had long known those words from Alfred, Lord Tennyson’s poem “The Charge of the Light Brigade” (1854), but I didn’t realize until doing research for my May 10 blog article on Florence Nightingale that that “charge” was during an October 1854 battle in the Crimean War. 

By Richard Caton Woodville, Jr. (1894)

The Battle of Balaklava

The Crimean War was waged between October 1853 and February 1856. It was between the Russians on one side and the British, French, and Ottoman Turks on the other.

A major event in the war was the siege of Sevastopol, the home of a major fleet of Russian ships and currently the largest city in Crimea. The siege lasted for nearly a year beginning on September 25, 1854.

Balaclava, now a part of the city of Sevastopol, was the site of the calamitous charge of the British light brigade on October 25.

It was calamitous (according to this article), for the British cavalry charged “needlessly to their doom under the muddled and misinformed orders of their superiors.”

The British Light Brigade

A brigade is a military unit and the “light brigade” in the battle of Balaklava was the British cavalry force mounted on light, fast horses that were unarmored.

On that fateful day in October 1854, the light brigade was missent to attack a Russian artillery battery for which they were ill-equipped to confront, and the assault ended with very high British casualties.

Just a little over six weeks later, Tennyson’s poem was published, and it said of the light brigade,

Boldly they rode and well,
Into the jaws of Death,
Into the mouth of hell
Rode the six hundred.

The Peril of Blind Allegiance

Tennyson’s powerful poem seems to glorify the bravery of the cavalrymen. But doesn’t it also point out the peril of blind allegiance? Why should they be praised for riding into “the valley of Death” even though they knew “Someone had blundered”?

Blind allegiance is a characteristic of those who become followers of a cult, defined as “a group of people with extreme dedication to a certain leader or set of beliefs that are often expressed as an excessive and misplaced admiration for someone or something.”

One of the best-known examples of a cult and the destructiveness of blind allegiance is that of the Peoples Temple led by Jim Jones.

In November 1978, over 900 people of that cult who had moved with Jones to Jonestown, Guyana, literally “drank the Kool-Aid” (which was really Flavor Aid) in an act of mass murder/suicide. This was an act of blind allegiance that was much more deadly than that of the British light brigade in 1854.

A religious cult with vastly more members, but much less destructive to this point, is the Unification Church which was founded in 1954 by Sun Myung Moon in South Korea.

Steven Hassan, who was 19 at the time, joined the Unification Church in 1974. A few years later he left that group, and following the Jonestown mass suicide and murders, in 1979 Hassan founded a non-profit organization called "Ex-Moon Inc." He has been fighting cults ever since.

Last year Hassan published a book titled The Cult of Trump. (There can be and are political cults as well as religious ones.) 

There are, naturally, those who object to referring to DJT’s most ardent followers as being part of a Trump cult. (See here, for example.)

Still, a majority (55%) of Republicans for whom Fox News is their primary news source say there is nothing Trump could do to lose their approval (bolding added; from PRRI on 10/19). That sounds very much like what members of a cult would say.

To such people I want to say, Beware of the peril of blind allegiance. You need to reason why and not be willing just to do and die.

22 comments:

  1. Please understand that I am not charging all who support DJT and who will vote for him in the November election are devotees of "the Trump cult." But it seems to me that what can be called a Trump cult, or Trumpism, does exist and a sizeable portion of the voters in the country are adherents of such a cult.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Those who still support this monster are grossly uninformed or are cult members. Either support, I will never forget or forgive. My lack of religion allows me that option. They’ve had 4-5 years to understand his criminality in addition to being almost inhuman. There are one-issue people who will close their eyes to get their issue, such as SCOTUS justices to overturn Roe, Brown or ACA. I'm placing them in the uninformed category. They have no idea the consequences of their compromise.

      Delete
  2. After I posted this, I saw Michael Gerson's 10/19 opinion piece on the Washington Post website. (Gerson, by the way, was named by Time magazine as one of "The 25 Most Influential Evangelicals In America.")

    Gerson's article is titled "The GOP’s agenda under Trump: Voter suppression, pandemic denial and a personality cult." It ends with these words:

    "What should we make of this GOP agenda: voter suppression, disease denial and a personality cult dedicated to a con man? It is the weakest appeal to the public of any modern presidential candidate. The Republican Party may win or lose. But it deserves to lose."

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thank you for this, Leroy. I was not aware of this story and agree with the parallel.
    This morning I sent an email to someone I love and respect, who has been astonishingly persist in support of DJT. I wrote her as follows:

    "I've wondered where your thoughts are on Trump these days!
    No idea what news sources you are reading but I hope that you're seeing this kind of report:
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-fauci-campaign-biden/2020/10/19/30b2fe58-1226-11eb-82af-864652063d61_story.html.
    He's cutting his own throat for the data is clear he is quite out of step with the public on the number one concern for voters.

    I find the thought of maintaining this obviously delusional man in a position with more control over life and death and generational wellbeing of all of humanity than any other human being appalling.

    My question for you and any other sincere person of integrity who has supported Trump is: wouldn't you want to be able to say to yourself a few years down the road: At least I saw through him in the end. There's an enormous amount of info that strongly suggests he's in the gravest of difficulties financially and probably legally. I think there's at least a 50/50 chance that he'll go to prison on tax fraud charges. He will look so different in the rear view mirror than he has looked up till now and I think when he no longer has the power of the White House to maneuver with, that will rapidly become obvious.

    It is your convictions on a few key issues that have kept you as a supporter. But I am sure you would agree that at some point, agreement on important issues is not enough to require of a leader. And if that is true, then I would ask: What other requirements do I have in order to endorse a leader? What qualities besides my key concerns have to be present?

    Prayers for you and all of us in this troubled time!
    Ron

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Ron, for responding to this morning's blog post and for sharing the powerful letter you sent to your friend. I hope she will be moved, and changed, by it.

      Delete
  4. Just about 7:00 this morning, local Thinking Friend Sue Wright sent me this much-appreciated email:

    "I love this blog. Using poetry — a well-known poem that many of us have read — brought home what sits in some of our wondering heads day and night these days. We wonder the blind allegiance of Trump followers, some members of our own families. People who seem absolutely mesmerized by the man’s personality even though they are probably more at risk if he is elected again than ourselves. They have the most to lose and yet they are blind to his behavior and rhetoric, his plans for our futures. And so, we see them jump off a cliff, march into a hopeless battle, and on and on. We see this kind of thing glorified in movies too.

    "The power of cult mentality seems the only way to explain this 'crazy' mind-set. Certainly clear facts don’t work to change Trump-heads. Hopefully, if we can put a mild persona but one who performs rationally back in the WH, some of these folks will reconsider the path they have chosen to our country’s annihilation and return to something safer called sanity."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Sue, for your kind words about this post and for your powerful and pertinent comments.

      Delete
  5. Comments from local Thinking Friend Ed Kail:


    "Well put.

    "If not totally blind obedience, it can be selective vision, focused on one or two things and ignoring many others."

    ReplyDelete
  6. An important message, Leroy. Thanks. I tried to respond early today from my phone, but was unable to do so.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Yesterday afternoon I also received these comments from Thinking Friend Michael Olmsted in Springfield, Mo.:

    "Sadly I have heard several people voice their 'blind' devotion to Trump ... ignore his language, that's just his style ... no president has ever done as much good for the U.S. as Trump ... Trump is our only hope of breaking free from the financial system that big business has created to the peril of 'real' citizens ... Trump is our only hope to protect the unborn from death ... Trump is, and so the empty words engulf our nation day after day.

    "We can argue with logic and the response is the same blind allegiance that has no connection to reality. We must pray and vote and pray some more. I keep reminding friends that we cannot blame God for this engulfing tragedy. Our disaster is the result of our choices, and only the grace and love of God can change the course of history. Will we do the right thing?"

    ReplyDelete
  8. Dr. Will Adams, who is past 90, is my oldest Thinking Friend, I think. Here are comments he sent yesterday about this blog post:

    "Of course you are right. One of the most essential, and difficult, characteristics of a free person in a free society is the ability to hold values that you would defend to the death and, at the same time, keep in the back of your head the idea that 'I might be wrong.' Only with such a disclaimer can you advocate your view of what you believe and, at the same time, respect the views of those who disagree with you. Yet such an outlook is the foundation of a democratic free society. It is hard to argue with someone who does not hold such values."

    ReplyDelete
  9. Here are candid comments from a Thinking Friend in Arizona:

    "I appreciated your last blog on 'the cult of Trump' and I have ordered the book you mentioned. I have seen the Trump 'cultism' in my own family as well as friends. The common thread of 'brain-washing' is so evident in their adoration of Trump that it is disturbing if not sickening.

    "I remember Jim Jones, David Koresh, the Manson Family and Heaven's Gate in my own lifetime, but I think the most glaring example might be Nazism. It is almost unthinkable that the Germany that gave us such outstanding leaders in science, music and philosophy could produce a monster such as Adolph Hitler and his henchmen. Otherwise good and decent people, out of fear, fell under the spell of Hitler and became part of his ugly regime.

    "I see the same conversion taking place today in America and it so hard to understand. God help us to have a change in the White House this November."

    ReplyDelete
  10. Thinking Friend Greg Hadley in Japan posted these thoughtful comments on Facebook (after I linked to this article there):

    "I’ve read your article with great interest, and I’ve been thinking about it over the past couple of days. I also thought the comments of those on your blog page are very insightful. It is a cult, and people are brainwashing themselves through constant exposure to commentators on Fox News. Whenever I go back to the Midwest, in stores, restaurants, hotels, people’s homes, Fox News is playing incessantly in the background. The only other place I have seen that had that type of intensive exposure to one media source all day long was China.

    "Some of my dearest friends and earliest mentors have definitely changed over the years as a result of this indoctrination. They have become more like the one they follow, and less like the one they claim to be following. Of course, all of us must be aware of such possibilities in our own lives."

    ReplyDelete
  11. Yesterday I received the following comments from Thinking Friend Tom Lamkin in North Carolina:

    "Since I started voting in 1968, I believe I can agree we have had 'presidential cults.' Trumpism is only the latest, hence I agree with your premise. Prior to Trump taking the stage, I would say Nixon qualifies at least in his first term, followed by Reagan and Obama. Slogans were used about all of these that would qualify as statements of cultic allegiance. Though these men did good while serving as president, too often their detrimental biases were ignored by their followers. Not until the last few years of his life, nearly fifteen years after Reagan left office, did my father agree that maybe Reagan was probably not the best president of the twentieth century.

    "Adolf Hitler built a cult because he appealed to a group (or nation) that felt humiliated with promises he would take them to the Promised Land. That never happens in our sin-controlled world unless you are willing to stomp on those who disagree. Putin calls it the west trying to isolate Russia again while he dreams of rebuilding the Greater Russia. Xi seeks to purify China from what he calls the corrupting western influence including that terrible 'white Jesus' of Christianity by billing himself as the new messiah. North Korea is in a class all its own."

    ReplyDelete
  12. And here is part of an email I received very early this morning from Thinking Friend Eric Dollard in Chicago:

    "Thanks, Leroy, for sharing your observations about cults.

    "A classic work about cults and mass movements is Eric Hoffer's 'The True Believer,' first published in 1951. Much of what Hoffer says is true of the Trump movement, although not all of Trump's supporters manifest a cult mentality. Nonetheless, Trump's true believers view Trump as some sort of demigod, a myth Trump tries to promote."

    ReplyDelete
  13. Eric, thanks for mentioning Hoffer and his seminal book. It has been a long time since I read any of it, but as you say it is a classic and thus still pertinent to today's situation.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Here are very long, and very thought-provoking, comments by Ed Costin, a Facebook friend who is from Grant City, Mo., as I am, and who now lives in California:

    "I can’t help but connect the dots between Tennyson and Rudyard Kipling, who wrote the sequel, if you will, 'The Last of the Light Brigade,' 36 years later. It follows a few remaining solders, and their quest to confront the ghosts of the past, to try and find some remediation from the tragedies suffered under inept leadership.

    "Nine years after 'The Last of the Light Brigade,' we find Kipling still writing about war and soldiers, this time encouraging the principles of imperialism and the conquest of the 'new-caught, sullen peoples, half-devil and half-child' of the Philippine Islands in 'The White Man’s Burden.' Echoed are the principles of American colonial expansion, under the guise of the divinely inspired term, 'Manifest Destiny.' That is, none other than GOD HIMSELF has declared that the white man must tame the savages and become their cultural and societal overlords, so as to save them from themselves and their pitiful existence.

    "The great lesson to be learned here, of course, is that apparently, the lesson has yet to be learned. The only reason the United States of America even exists today is because back in the 1770s, England was in its heyday of imperialism, and America was just another English colony, like India, Australia, or Barbados. But by 1776, not only had England’s reach exceeded its grasp, by this time, the American colonialists had begun to realize the vast, untapped resources the new land of America had to offer. They understood that if they could establish their OWN foothold on this land, there would be no way possible for England to maintain its existing colonies all over the world AND control the boundless, unexplored, endless expansion into the untamed west. They were right.

    "The reason England failed in it’s attempt to maintain its hold on America is the direct result of its failed economic policy at the time, 'mercantilism,' under which the country was operating. Before I define mercantilism, let’s fast-forward to the last four years of the Drumpf Presidency, and the economic, foreign, and trade policies he promoted and attempted (sometimes successfully) to achieve for the country. Following is a partial list of the principle tenets of mercantilism, as defined in 1684 Austria, along with modern day examples of how Drumpf tried to institute this failed economic theory for the United States:

    "* That every little bit of a country's soil be utilized for agriculture, mining or manufacturing. [Drumpf wants to open all government lands for mining and promotes incentive for farmers to produce more, and though he talks about expanding American manufacturing, he has (for better or worse) failed miserably at that component.]
    - That all raw materials found in a country be used in domestic manufacture, since finished goods have a higher value than raw materials. [This is why Drumpf promotes fracking, the Canadian pipeline, and this false notion that somehow opening up all land to oil and coal extraction will lead to the U.S. becoming 'energy independent' (a fallacy on its face), and again, promotes the mining industry. Even though better, cleaner resources are available. The implicit message to the American people is that if we drill and frack all this oil right here in the U.S., somehow we won’t need to buy oil from other countries. The truth is, the global oil market is a juggernaut controlled strictly by money. The majority of crude oil that makes its way from U.S. soil and Canadian pipelines down to the Texas port refineries is sold overseas (and mostly to China), because the oil companies determine the market, not the U.S. government. And the oil companies make a LOT more money selling that oil overseas than they do selling it here in the U.S., at a low cost, to American consumers.]

    [continued below]

    ReplyDelete
  15. [Ed Costin's comments continued from above.]

    "* That a large, working population be encouraged. [And THIS is what the whole “abortion” debate is REALLY all about! Billionaire Republicans couldn’t care less about “abortion” or “right to life” or however you want to define a woman’s personal healthcare matters. ALL they care about is building a large, uneducated, poor work force. The simple fact is Billionaire Republicans DO NOT WANT a well-educated population, they want slave labor. So if you can keep people poor, breeding, and uneducated, you’ll have PLENTY of workers with no better options that will take whatever pittance you pay them in order for you to expand profitability on your capitalistic business empire. Sound familiar? If not, take a good look around the United States of America in 2020...]

    "* That all imports of foreign goods be discouraged as much as possible. [Wanna know the REAL reason Drumpf started a trade war with China? This.]
    "
    In a nutshell, Drumpf is attempting to incorporate the same failed, bad policies as King George back in 1776, and we all know how that turned out for England!

    "The irony here is that Drumpf supporters, while envisioning themselves as great patriots, in the shadow of our forefathers, are supporting the tyrannical equivalent of King George, not the freedom-loving liberalism of Thomas Jefferson! They fly their 'Don’t Tread On Me' flags, while pledging allegiance to the Crown of England. Except in this case, they’re trading their personal financial well-being and physical health for allegiance to a billionaire reality show host, whose only goal in the Presidency is to use it (and his supporters) to further build his own personal wealth (or more accurately, bail him out of debt to foreign creditors).

    "Thank you for the story, I was not that familiar with Tennyson or his work, but it was nice to be able to see how it fits in to the overall picture of how the world has engaged with itself over the course of the building of our civilization to its current state."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I much appreciate these lengthy and thought-provoking comments from a man whose name I have long known but whom I do not know personally.

      As I wrote to him early today, the Wikipedia article on "The Last . . ." says that "Kipling's poem was largely ignored." Perhaps that is the reason I did not know about it.

      So, I appreciate Ed writing about Kipling's poem--and all of the other important things he referred to in his comments.

      Delete
  16. What I have learned from Trump is how easily all of us are led into error, even by one so obviously corrupt and incompetent. Indeed, his term "fake news" will live on long after him, because so much of news truly is fake, from the right-of-center PBS Newshour, to the full-blown craziness of Fox. Corporate owners and sponsors dominate the news. Of course, Trump's use of "fake news" is itself fake news, because he worships the most fake news of all, Fox. Discerning the truth is slow and hard. As Isaiah 53:6 warns us, "All we like sheep have gone astray; we have all turned to our own way."

    Something I just learned from this blog (thank you, Ed Costin) is that Kipling wrote The Last of the Light Brigade. It was written long ago, but still seems strangely modern. Let the brave read here: http://www.kiplingsociety.co.uk/poems_brigade.htm

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, as always, for your comments, Craig. It was somewhat of a relief to me that you, with your wide range of knowledge, didn't know about "The Last of the Light Brigade" either. As I said above, I also am thankful that Ed (from my hometown of Grant City, no less) wrote about that. I read it online soon after reading about it, but I didn't link to the website so I appreciate it that you did.

      Delete