Monday, October 5, 2020

Junípero Serra: A Sorry Saint

Even though he has little name recognition in most circles, this article is about a man of considerable importance in the history of California and of marked religious interest since he was canonized by Pope Francis five years ago on September 23, 2015. 

Who Was Junípero Serra?

Miguel José Serra was born in November 1713 on the Spanish island of Mallorca in the Mediterranean Sea. When he took his vows to become a Franciscan priest in 1737, Serra took the name Junípero, which was the name of one of St. Francis’s devoted friends.

From his childhood, Serra dreamed of becoming a missionary. After teaching philosophy for several years in Spain, in 1749 he finally was able to make the 6,000-mile trip to Mexico and to begin missionary work there.

On December 15 of that year, Father Serra and another priest started walking from the coastal city of Veracruz to Mexico City, some 260 miles away. On the journey, he was bitten by a mosquito and his left foot became infected. He suffered for the rest of his life from that malady.

Serra spent 38½ years as a missionary in Mexico, Baja California, and in what was then known as Alta California. He died in what is now Monterey County, California, in August 1784 at the age of 70.

The Noble Junípero Serra

Serra’s main claim to fame is as the founder of nine “missions” along the coast of California, from San Diego de Alcalá (in 1769) in the south to San Francisco de Asís (in 1776) on the north. The current cities of San Diego and San Francisco, of course, grew out of Serra’s missions.

In 1769, it is estimated that there were around 300,000 Native Americans in what is now California. Through the indefatigable efforts of Serra and his co-workers, about one-third of those became Roman Catholics.

Because of his meritorious missionary work, Serra became the first Hispanic person to be canonized—by the first Hispanic Pope in the first canonization mass held in the United States.

Even though he was a Franciscan priest and missionary, Serra is sometimes called “the father of California” (see here, for example). Pope Francis has said that he sees Serra as “one of the founding fathers of the United States.” Many Californians through the years have agreed.

As you probably know, each state chooses statues of two of the most important persons in their states to stand in the U.S. Capitol Building. California’s statues are of Ronald Regan and the noble Junípero Serra.

The Ignoble Junípero Serra

There are many who disagree with Serra’s adulation, however. At the time of his canonization, there were serious protests in California, especially by Native Americans. Serra’s statue in a city park in Monterey was decapitated at that time. 

Interestingly, in sympathy with the protests against Confederate statues this year, Serra’s monuments again became targets of protest. On June 19 activists pulled down a Serra statue in San Francisco’s Golden Gate Park, and the next day, a Serra statue in Los Angeles was toppled. 

A 9/29/15 New York Times article frankly states, “Historians agree that [Serra] forced Native Americans to abandon their tribal culture and convert to Christianity, and that he had them whipped and imprisoned and sometimes worked or tortured to death.”

Ten weeks before Serra’s canonization, Pope Francis publicly apologized for the “grave sins” of colonialism against Indigenous Peoples of America. But that did not keep him from following through with his making Serra a saint.

Although there is much to admire about Junípero Serra, it was probably a mistake for him to be canonized—but since he was, it is fitting to call Serra a sorry saint.

◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊

Dan Horan is a Franciscan priest and a theology professor whom I cited at some length in my August 25 blog post. On July 8 he had a thought-provoking article largely about Serra in the National Catholic Reporter, and I recommend the careful reading of that perceptive article titled “The preferential option for the removal of statues.”

13 comments:

  1. For the first part of my teaching career, when I mentioned Serra I gave the standard California description. Then I actually checked on him. Leroy is right. Serra is no more a saint than the torturers of the Inquisition with whom he should be classed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I appreciate the candid comments of whoever posted this, but I would like to know who he or she is.

      Delete
  2. Here are comments from local Thinking Friend Ken Grenz:

    "When I was a 4th grader, I lived briefly in California. It was the year grade schoolers studied state history. Father Serra stood out in gleaming hagiography! It has thus been painful to learn how I was duped by the representation of this 'sorry saint.'”

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for sharing this, Ken.

      Yes, I'm afraid that school children get taught a lot of things that badly need to be more nuanced.

      In preparation for writing today's blog article, among other things I read the 1996 book "Father Junípero Serra: Founder of California Missions" by Donna Genet, "a social studies educator and historian." That book, classified as "juvenile literature," did point out some of the problems in Serra's work and made reference to some of the Native American criticism of it.

      Delete
  3. Thinking Friend Dickson Yagi in California writes,

    "Living in California just about 15 miles from one of Serra’s famous mission, I greatly appreciate your essay. You must have held yourself back from filling your essay with horrible crimes of Serra."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, there is certainly much more I could have written about the negative aspects of Serra's mission work--but he treated the Native Americans much better than did the Spanish soldiers, with whom he was in conflict with often.

      Serra was just a "typical" Catholic missionary operating on the basis of the Doctrine of Discovery promulgated by the Pope in 1452. I am disappointed that Pope Francis has not (yet?) renounced that "Doctrine."

      Delete
  4. Thinking Friend Virginia Belk in New Mexico shares these comments:

    "You've phrased well the positive and negative aspects of this individual. This saga is typical of the controversy evolving from The Doctrine of Discovery and colonialization, in general. Having worked as a teacher of three different minority populations where student body WASP was a minority but it was the majority of the teaching staff, I am constantly conflicted. I think the best I can do is continue to treat all those with whom I come in contact, with respect.

    "Right now, the city of Albuquerque officials are studying about where to relocate two sculptural displays to a location that acknowledges contributions of the Hispanic ancestors while respecting the 19 Pueblo members' justified extreme objection to honoring the cruel, inhumane, and deplorable actions taken toward their ancestors. Although it has not received much publicity recently due to concerns with the again rising number of Covid cases, I would welcome your joining me in praying about this issue.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Virginia, for sharing your experience in the past as well as the current situation in New Mexico.

      Along the same line as your second paragraph, on Monday evening of last week I was one of the speakers who called on the Liberty City Council to remove the Confederate statue/memorial from the Fairview Cemetery (just a few blocks from the square). Do you remember seeing that statue when you lived in Liberty? I didn't know it was there until just a few years ago, but it is easily seen from the main street that runs on the north side of the cemetery. It was erected in 1904, but a few African-Americans and quite a number of us White supporters are now working for its removal.

      Delete
  5. Inquisition is what came to my mind after reading this. Timing and birthplace suggest Serra could have been very aware of the Inquisition tactics. Pope Francis effectively affirmed the Inquisition with this canonization, so renouncing "Doctrine" is probably not high on his list. I have been a fan of Pope Francis, at least as much as a Baptist can be, but he is definitely human.

    On a separate note about selective history, someone sent me a link (coincidently about the time of your abortion blog) to the September 26, 2020 revival in DC by Jonathan Cahn. Cahn started with the arrival of the Mayflower and by his words canonized the Pilgrims. I knew that was a bad start and it went downhill from there. I could not listen to all of it, but what I picked up is that the USA must stop abortions and not tolerate Gay Pride nor transgender, and America will be great again.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. [Posted yesterday; corrected and re-posted now.}

      Dennis, I appreciate you reading this blog post and taking the time to write and post your comments, but I am not sure of why you are linking Serra's missionary work to the Inquisition. The latter started long before Serra was born and was mainly for the purpose of eradicating heresy from the Catholic Church. According to Wikipedia,

      "In 1542 Pope Paul III established the Congregation of the Holy Office of the Inquisition as a permanent congregation staffed with cardinals and other officials. It had the tasks of maintaining and defending the integrity of the faith and of examining and proscribing errors and false doctrines; it thus became the supervisory body of local Inquisitions. Arguably the most famous case tried by the Roman Inquisition was that of Galileo Galilei in 1633."

      Delete
    2. Yesterday, Dennis responded, "Sorry, I should have specified Spanish Inquisition. Let me know if you do not see that connection," and a few minutes ago I replied as follows:

      Well, I should have responded by referring to the Spanish Inquisition, and I apologize for not doing so. But my response would have been largely the same.

      According to Wikipedia, "The Tribunal of the Holy Office of the Inquisition . . .  commonly known as the Spanish Inquisition . . . was established in 1478 by Catholic Monarchs Ferdinand II of Aragon and Isabella I of Castile. It was intended to maintain Catholic orthodoxy in their kingdoms . . . ." Further, "The Inquisition was originally intended primarily to identify heretics among those who converted from Judaism and Islam to Catholicism."

      The disdain for those who were not Christians and the cruelty toward non-Christians was still evident in the Spanish government and its military in California during Serra's time, so there is some continuity. And Serra, a loyal Spaniard, was doubtlessly influenced by those prevalent ideas. But, as I have said previously, he was not nearly as cruel toward the Native Americans as the Spanish soldiers were--or as the Spanish government had been since the 16th century.  

      Delete
  6. Early this morning, Thinking Eric Dollard of Chicago sent an email with these comments:

    "Thanks, Leroy, for bringing up Junipero Serra, a flawed saint, whose treatment of Native Americans in California was less than Christ-like.

    "It is tragic to see the loss of Native American cultural traditions and languages. Without those traditions, Native Americans lose touch with their roots, their ancestry, and their identity. We visited the Hopi reservation in Arizona in 1993 and a Hopi woman told me that the Hopi people are lost between two cultures, which has led to substance abuse and other social ills. While some of the blame for this must rest with the missionaries, the U S government has been a worse offender in trying to destroy these native cultures. It is very sad."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. [Posted yesterday, but corrected and re-posted again now.]

      Thanks for your comments, Eric. I agree that some of Serra's actions with regard to the Native Americans were less than Christ-like. But, as I indicated above, his actions were far better as a whole than that of the Spanish military.

      Certainly, imperial missionary activity was defective in the 18th and 19th centuries, but as you indicated, government activity (whether by the Spanish in California in the 1760s and '70s or by the U.S. in, say, the 1820s and '30s--and here I am thinking especially about Andrew Jackson in the U.S.--was much worse.

      Delete