Saturday, October 10, 2020

What To Do about a White Jesus?

Earlier this year I wrote about removing Confederate statues, and my previous post was about toppling statues of the Franciscan missionary Junípero Serra. But now I tackle an even harder question: what should be done about the statues—and stained-glass windows—of a white Jesus?

The Popularity of a White Jesus

By far, the most famous painting of Jesus is Warner Sallman’s “Head of Christ.” Sallman (1892~1968) completed that painting in 1940, and in the 80 years since, some say it has been reproduced a billion times. 

News stories this year about Sallman’s painting have been titled “How Jesus became white” (see here, for example), but there were a multitude of paintings and stained-glass windows depicting a white Jesus long before 1940.

From the late 16th century until the early 20th century, Raphael’s “The Transfiguration” (1520) was the most famous oil painting in the world, and Jesus is clearly “white” and with blond hair. (See Anna House’s 7/17/20 essay, “The long history of how Jesus came to resemble a white European.”)

The Problem of a White Jesus

Eminent Black theologian James Cone highlighted the problem of a white Jesus in his book The Cross and the Lynching Tree (2011): “The White Christ gave blacks slavery, segregation, and lynching and told them to turn the other cheek and to look for their reward in heaven” (p. 115).

Partly for reasons noted by Cone (1938~2018), according to a June 22 Newsweek article, Shaun King, an American writer, civil rights activist, and co-founder of the Real Justice PAC, has insisted that “White Jesus statues should be torn down.”

King (b. 1979) also asserted that stained glass windows and other images of a white Jesus should be destroyed, insisting that they are “racist propaganda” and “a gross form of white supremacy.”

In his hard-hitting 2019 book Dear Church, Lenny Duncan, a Black Lutheran pastor, writes about how he and other Blacks have been hurt by the prevalent symbol of “a white Norwegian Jesus” (p. 68).

Kelly Brown Douglas, Dean of the Episcopal Divinity School at Union Seminary in New York, writes in the October 7 issue of The Christian Century about “Struggling with Black faith in America.”

Dean Douglas says that as a girl, the Jesus of her Sunday school lessons ”was always pictured as White. This fact alone made me skeptical of his love for me.”

Further, she writes, “How could a White Jesus ever care about me, not to speak of caring for poor Black children? And how could I, a Black person, ever have faith in a White Jesus?”

Douglas goes on to say that as she was “experiencing an agonizing crisis of faith,” she was introduced to Cone’s book A Black Theology of Liberation (1970)—and the content of that book was definitely liberating for her.

“I could be Black with a love for Jesus without contradiction, because in fact Jesus was Black like me,” she realized.

What To Do about a White Jesus?

Since the summer of 2019, I have served as the chair of my church’s Worship Committee. Most of this year has been hard because of not being able to have in-person worship services.

Unexpectedly, our committee was confronted with the problem of what to do, if anything, about the large stained-glass window in our sanctuary. It quite clearly portrays a white Jesus, as you can see in this picture: 

Our church building was acquired from the Methodists, and when it was remodeled in the early 2000s the stained-glass window was re-done—but there was no change to the Scandinavian appearance of Jesus.

We continue to wrestle with the question, What should be done about the White Jesus in our stained-glass window?

What advice would you give me and my committee?

27 comments:

  1. The first response received this morning was a very welcome one from local Thinking Friend Vern Barnet. He suggested,

    "Do what Paul Smith did at Broadway Baptist -- collect and display images of Jesus of many cultures and in many styles."

    And Vern helpfully included this link to Smith's collection: http://www.feniva.com/prs/new3/gallery.html

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks, Vern, for your suggestion. I had heard of Paul Smith's collection but hadn't seen the website displaying them until after reading your email.

    Actually, at Rainbow Mennonite Church we have some artwork of a non-white Jesus, and one of the things we discussed at our Worship Committee meeting last week was increasing that artwork and even adding portrayals of a non-white Jesus to some of the stained-glass windows that have no images in our church building.

    But one of the committee members objected to that "solution," for, she said, the supremacy of the white Jesus would still be evident to all.

    BTW, I have known Paul Smith, who is a year older than I, since the 1970s, and I remember the delightful conversation I had with him in 1986 or '87 at the old Tippin's restaurant across Oak Street Trafficway from Midwestern Seminary. Unfortunately, I have had little, if any, personal contact with him in the years since then.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Here are comments from Dennis Boatright, another local Thinking Friend, who was a regular member of the Sunday School class June and I attended from the last part of 2005 until the summer of 2011.

    "The call for removing White Jesus is completely new to me. I have been aware that depictions of Jesus as white are fiction for decades; I just had not heard about a call to remove them. It makes sense to me but obviously this is going to be another topic to divide the country and churches. That is no reason for congregations open to action not to do it, but the number of those acting will likely be depressingly low.

    "It will be interesting to hear the objections that will span from cost prohibitive to changing history to who knows how creative they will be. I could see someone using the example of Black Santa as an argument for inclusiveness. Since your committee is already wrestling with these objections since if not the window would already be replaced, what are they?"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for your thoughtful comments, Dennis. Yes, this emphasis on removing "white Jesus" statues and stained-glass windows is a relatively new movement, it seems.

      Rainbow Mennonite Church is a progressive, very socially-aware church, but as far as I know there was no thought of changing from the white Jesus when the stained-glass window was re-done fifteen years, or so, ago.

      And, yes, one of my fears is this matter becoming a divisive issue in our church, which I certainly don't want to be a part of. Both because of the cost as well as because of the sentimental value of our strikingly beautiful window, I can imagine a sizeable percentage of our members not favor altering the window, although most would, I think, agree that there are problems with the image of a white Jesus.

      The prohibitive cost is certainly a major factor. The man who re-did the window several years ago gave us an estimate of over $4,000 for changing the sections with the white skin. But the "Scandinavian" face shape and hair would remain--and one of our committee members said we can't have a "Norwegian" Jesus in blackface! And if we changed the whole head, the cost would likely be as much as $8,000.

      Delete
  4. I recommend the PBS documentary “Jesus: The Face in Art,” in particular the closing sequence, viewable here, which shows a variety of ways Jesus has been depicted in art through the ages: https://youtu.be/yjGx11i3zDw?t=515

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have made especially frequent use of Sadao Watanabe’s wood block prints with my congregation members and seminary students as a way to help us imagine the biblical stories afresh: http://www.bowdencollections.com/watanabe/watanabe.html

      Delete
    2. Oops, got the title wrong of the PBS documentary, it’s “The Face: Jesus in Art”: https://pbsinternational.org/programs/the-face-jesus-in-art/ (the whole thing appears to be available in parts on YouTube and might be streamable on other services, but you can also get it on DVD, as I did years ago)

      Delete
    3. Thanks for your recommendations, J.P. They are helpful for seeing Jesus in ways other than as a white, "Scandinavian" man. But that doesn't help us solve the problem of what to do with the large stained-glass window depicting a "Norwegian Jesus."

      Delete
  5. Well, Leroy, we might begin by acknowledging the futility of trying to deny or undo the past, but we can correct errors and more beyond shortcomings. We are all bound, incarnated, into a particular time, place, and culture, in a long, constantly changing history and environment. A starting place is to acknowledge the particular art, spirituality and religious imagination that produced the liturgical aide we now find distracting or malfunctioning. We can do the same thing we did-are doing-with reredos behind altars, altars facing away from the assembly, and communion rails. Try to find a way to afford to make the change or put up alternative representations in other prominent places.
    I appreciate and value Jaroslav’s The Illustrated Jesus through the Centuries (Yale U Press, 1997) with its 18 themed chapters and themes or artistic perspectives on representing a visual of an imagined Jesus. In 2000, its millennium project, the National Catholic Reporter had a juried prize contest for a representation of “Jesus 2000”. (Booklet, Dec 24, 1999, 32 pp, 60 images culled from 1,678 entries of 1004 artists. Abstracts, highly stylized, very few white and none like the 1880 to 1980 windows in too many Christian churches. So, there are other ways to have a mental image of that native “peasant” “rabbi” from Nazareth, in the time of Augustus

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Larry, for your suggestions. I fully agree, and most of the members at my church would likely also agree, that there are "other ways to have a mental image of that native 'peasant' 'rabbi' from Nazareth, in the time of Augustus." But, indeed, there is the matter of cost, which would be considerable, including the cost of installing an alternative representation, for if the latter was not also large and prominent, the existing window would still denote white supremacy.

      Delete
  6. Thinking Friend T.J. Trullinger from my home county in northwest Missouri shares the following comments:

    "I vote for archiving pictures, paintings, stained glass reproductions of a white Jesus because it is our church history and we must own that history. However, we have hopefully progressed enough in our reasoning to know that such icons are not useful at this time in our history and should not be displayed as though they were our values in the present age."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tom, thanks for your suggestion--and I agree with it. But the major problem of doing what you suggested is the expense that would entail. It would cost tens of thousands of dollars to archive our stained-glass window and replace it with something more suitable.

      Delete
  7. And here are comments from local Thinking Friend Marilyn Peot:

    "I can't resist sharing on the 'appearance of Jesus.' As to 'white Jesus' we must admit a Jewish man from the Mideast would have had a distinct look about him..

    "Several years ago I saw a 'Popular Mechanics' magazine in a doctor's office. On the front was an outline of a face with a question mark under the heading "What did Jesus look like"? From visits to the Holy Land and the use of forensics, the looks of Jesus was then discovered--surely not as a 'tall, white, and blond' Jewish man.

    "The article was fascinating and delighted me. It was discovered (?) that Jesus would have been short, no beard, cropped black hair....I had visions of a feisty young man preaching, healing, loving, forgiving, reprimanding, and living out of a profound experience of the Divine!

    "The morning after I had read the article, I saw the front page of the morning paper. There was a picture of a large crowd of young men straight from the Mideast--and yes, all of them looking like the finished product of our researcher of the magazine.

    "I also have seen artist's redoing portraits of Jesus--none of them white!

    "I can certainly understand the thrust toward removing some of our 'unsatisfactory' images of Jesus!"

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hello Leroy, I think your window should stay, and that the church could, in some way, offer other non-white portrayals of Jesus as well. I think every ethnic and racial group will portray Jesus as their own, i.e., red, yellow, black, brown and white. I don't see this as a problem as long as we emphasize that all of these portrayals are meaningful to us all, enhance the unity of humankind rather than dividing us, inspire and edify those who worship. Idealistically speaking, of course, Jesus should be portrayed within the context of a first century Jew.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Not an answer to your question, but thought this was very good:
    https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10223060917972949&set=a.4640208324793&type=3&eid=ARDGr9IICQGHf53cF4CplZzACtXTZ3ps7iCPkxbNC0RDAHOcXHD4dLTzuV5LCJZ0M7Ji2x2g_v__90AR

    ReplyDelete
  10. The most succinct, and perhaps the most significant, comment I have received about this blog post is from Thinking Friend Nolan Carrier in south Missouri. (Nolan was a student of mine at Southwest Baptist College, now University, in 1972!, and later he was pastor of the Calvary Baptist Church in Windsor, Mo.; I was the first pastor of that church and it was my first pastorate.)

    Here is what Nolan wrote:

    “Pay now or pay later!” It has no future if you are true to the Gospel!"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. When I asked Nolan for some clarification/elaboration of what he wrote, here is part of his response:

      "How did Christians turn a blind eye to slavery for 400 plus years? Too many were 'running on the wrong tracks.' A prophet must call us out! 'This is not the proper application of the Gospel of Jesus Christ! You are wrong!' The phrase 'pay now or pay later' says to me it is costly to run on the wrong tracks, it does not get us where we must go, in fact it gets us farther from where we must be.

      "A prophet calls us out and says, 'Change now, get in line with the Gospel now, because if you are a Christ follower you have no choice and truly be true.' John the Baptist was not afraid to call people out! I really do not want to see anyone's head on a platter, but a prophet takes that risk. I hope you catch my drift. Painting White Jesus in "'running on the wrong tracks!" As soon as that becomes clear, then we have heard a Word from God!"

      Delete
  11. Here are comments from an intelligent young Thinking Friend in Georgia:

    "This would be my advice; gauge the community through talking to the congregation and your best guess of those who might someday come to the church. If anyone feels like it’s a barrier to them fully accepting Christianity, if anyone feels disconnected from Jesus because of it, then get rid of it. Any window in the world or any piece of art is not worth the soul of a single person. We ought to remove any barriers we can that stand between someone and the gospel. If you talk to people and gauge the community and the response is that the beauty of the window is inspiring and leads to people to think about and enter the presence of God in Sunday mornings, then keep it and cherish it as a reminder that Jesus came to save everyone, even white people, and desires a relationship with them."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with this friend in Georgia, at least mostly! I am a white member of Portland Mennonite Church and a graduate student studying memorials in Syracuse, New York. We have had Black people leave our church, and while their reasons for leaving were varied, white representations of Jesus and the child leading the wild animals in our stained glass contributed. Who does the church want to be part of the body of Christ? My summary is, "it costs a lot to replace these representations, but the cost not to is much higher."

      The only part I diverge from the friend in Georgia is the use of the argument that Jesus coming to save white people too as a reason to keep them. Jesus came to save white people too, but an ongoing structure of white supremacy means that these windows signify more than the inclusion of white people in the Kingdom of Heaven.

      My two cents! Thank you for the rich discussions on this page.

      Delete
    2. Thanks for your thoughtful comments, "Unknown," but I wish you had identified yourself.

      Delete
  12. I am late posting these comments Thinking Friend Eric Dollard sent on Saturday afternoon:

    "Thanks, Leroy, for bringing up this interesting question.

    "It is almost certain that the historical Jesus did not have blue eyes, blond hair, or the skin color of a northern European. Although I generally support efforts to picture Jesus more accurately, as someone with a Middle Eastern complexion, dark eyes, and dark hair, it would be prohibitively expensive to replace all of the stained glass windows in which Jesus is portrayed as white. The money would be better spent on helping the poor.

    "If the message of Jesus is universal, then Jesus is above race and ethnicity and that is the central point to be emphasized. We too should all be above race and ethnicity and fully affirm the dignity of every human being."

    ReplyDelete
  13. Thinking Friend Dan O'Reagan in Louisiana makes this brief comment:

    "Putting a racial label on Jesus is in of itself racial [racist?]. He was of the same race as Jews and the same color as Jews. To change that is to be anti-Semitic."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dan, if your last sentence is true, which it may be, most of the pictures of Jesus since the Middle Ages have been anti-Semitic.

      Delete
  14. Well, the first thing that came to my mind were some words from an old 60s song I grew up with, although I had to search to find that it was from Brewer an Shipley's Oh Mommy. The line was "you already accused me twice of looking like Jesus Christ." For the curious, the song can be heard on YouTube here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hebfE2ot2mE

    So it is possible to get in trouble for looking too much like Jesus Christ, even as it is a problem not to look enough like His assumed appearance. I suppose it is just too difficult for some people to wrap their minds around the idea that ALL of us are created in the image of God. So what did Jesus really look like? A child in an ICE cage on the Mexican border? A COVID patient lying face-down in a hospital? Breonna Taylor dying, gunned down by police in her own home? We all have a right to see a bit of Jesus when we look in a mirror. But what did the historical Jesus really look like? I am going to guess, sort of like the late PLO leader Yasser Arafat. But if He looked like Colin Kaepernick, that would be cool, too.

    So, about the psychedelic hippie Jesus from the former Methodist Church. Is His white skin really the biggest problem? All those neon colors might be a mushroom issue. In the long run, move it to a library room with proper signage where it can be studied by the curious. In the short run, relabel the picture "Timothy Leary" and find a good cover story on how HE got stain glass! Research can begin with the Moody Blues here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZ4Foc8bnYM

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Craig, I'm sorry I didn't respond to your comments when they were fresh, but it was the 13th before I saw them and then I was focused on getting my next blog post finished by the 14th in order to post it early on the morning of the 15th.

      Our main discussion about the "white Jesus" was not about what Jesus looked like, although that was considered some, but about what message the large image of the white Jesus sends to those who are not white and especially those who have suffered because of "white supremacy," to which the white Jesus is perhaps linked.

      The more I have thought about it, though, the more I saw that just to change the color of Jesus' skin or even changing the whole head in the stained-glass window would not solve the problem--but my imagination didn't go so far as to think of the picture being a "psychedelic hippie Jesus." But now that you mention it . . . .

      Delete
  15. Thinking Friend Andrew Bolton now lives again in his home country of England, but he lived in the Kansas City area for many years and has visited Rainbow Mennonite Church. I was happy to receive a thoughtful, fairly lengthy email from him, and here is the last part of that message:

    "I have enjoyed collecting and using pictures of Christ in different ethnicities in my teaching for years. The problem is not that we have ‘a white Norwegian Christ’. A white Norwegian Christ is an extension of incarnation by art and the appropriating of the human Jesus as one of us in this particular ethnicity. What is hugely problematic is only seeing Jesus as a N. European, when Jesus belongs to us all. We need to celebrate incarnation in every culture and ethnicity. Jesus is local, ethnic, one of us, and draws us in to encounter the universal Presence, Creator, God, Spirit in whom we find our unity and common humanity, each with equal dignity.

    "So, coming to your wonderful Rainbow Mennonite congregation. Keep the white Jesus, but perhaps move it elsewhere and have an explanation of why the move - at its side – so it becomes a place of teaching for young and old. In its place – a prime site – have a rainbow Jesus - using art work from different ethnicities, so that anyone visiting from any ethnicity finds an image that says, Jesus is God with me and my group also.

    "Obviously, you cannot do every ethnicity but as a rainbow is a portal to many shades of colour, so your window can be a portal to Christ in many cultures, races and ethnicities and even genders.

    "Let me know when you plan to celebrate the installation of such a window, and if I can, I will come. If you seek donations for such a window, Jewell and I will contribute!"

    ReplyDelete
  16. When the Christians became the Roman religion, they, over time, essentially defaced or destroyed all remnants of Roman statuary. They salvaged the facade of the amphitheater, knocked genitalia from precious statues, burned the Library of Alexander, and other actions. I hate to see confederate memorabilia destroyed. I felt ashamed when our soldiers destroyed Hussain’s statute. These things have no place displayed, but they have a place in history, so I suggest preserving in museums. Same with white Jesus. Those windows and portraits are part of our history, although not accurate history. They should be replaced with what we now think is accurate, but preserved as part of history. I hate to see anything destroyed.

    ReplyDelete