Monday, June 30, 2025

What about Deconstruction?

In recent years, much has been written about Christian deconstruction. That may be a new term/concept to many of you, but it is something worth thinking about, for ourselves and for the people around us who are struggling with their faith or lack thereof. 

What is deconstruction? Well, in the physical world, we are all familiar with construction as meaning “the act or process of building something.” Similarly, deconstruction means the selective dismantlement of building components as opposed to demolition. It is construction in reverse.

Then there is the related word reconstruction, that is, “the act or process of building again something that was damaged or destroyed.” (Of course, Reconstruction was the term used for the turbulent era from 1865 to 1877 as the Confederate states were reintegrated into the United States.)

For quite some time, though, deconstruction has been used as a philosophical or literary term. In philosophy, it refers to the endeavor to understand the relationship between a text and its meaning. Philosopher Jacques Derrida (1930~2004) introduced that concept of deconstruction.

Somewhat surprisingly, since Derrida described himself as Jewish “without being Jewish,” his ideas about deconstruction have been influential among evangelical Christians, and especially among those who have become “progressive.”

Consider the construction, deconstruction, reconstruction process. Everyone acquires a constructed worldview, which for most people is linked to religious beliefs. The worldview or basic beliefs of children are constructed primarily by their parents and/or teachers (such as Sunday School teachers).

Most people grow up accepting what they have been taught without question—until they don’t. Some never change or veer very much from their other-constructed worldview or religious faith. Those who remain rooted in family and community structures into which they were born often make little change.

However, because of life experiences, critical thinking, and/or contact with different worldviews, most people who leave their birth “cocoon” begin the often rather painful process of deconstruction. That is true now for most Christian believers, of course.

According to Claude, in such cases, deconstruction for Christians

refers to a critical examination and dismantling of traditional religious beliefs, practices, and interpretations of scripture. This process involves questioning long-held assumptions about faith, doctrine, and biblical interpretation to uncover underlying power structures, cultural biases, and historical influences that may have shaped Christian understanding.*1

The final paragraph of Claude’s response to my question states, “The ultimate goal for many deconstructive theologians is not destruction but reconstruction—building a more authentic, inclusive, and contextually relevant understanding of Christian faith.” Touché!

Is deconstruction good or bad (beneficial or harmful)? In the past, I have written how “unexamined faith is not worth having,” and posted blog articles about “Growing in the Faith” (2/28/17) and about the importance of expanding one’s worldview (7/30/24).*2

From a Christian point of view, I think it is harmful when deconstruction ends up destroying one’s Christian faith, as it sometimes does. However, it is certainly beneficial when it leads to growth, an expanded worldview, and a faith strong enough to meet contemporary challenges to a Christian worldview.

The reconstructed faith may differ from the institutional Christianity to which one was formerly linked, but it may, in fact, be more closely linked to the real message of Jesus Christ.

Two examples of the latter are Martin Thielen and Jim Palmer, both former pastors and both now outside of organized Christianity as a religion but still Jesus-followers, it seems to me.

Thielen is a former Baptist and Methodist pastor. He elucidates the deconstruction and reconstruction of his Christian faith in “My Long Farewell to Traditional Religion (and What Remains),” posted on his Doubter’s Parish website.

Palmer is an M.Div. graduate of Trinity Divinity School and served many years as a Christian pastor before leaving the ministry in 2000. He started the online Center for Non-Religious Spirituality in 2021, creating a community for people to explore spirituality apart from the core beliefs of traditional religion.

Palmer, who writes extensively, also has a Substack newsletter titled “deconstructionology.” Some of you might like to read “What if …”, his June 27 post, which lists “17 ways to transform candidates for the hereafter into lovers of the world.”*3

Best wishes to all of you who are currently working on deconstruction and reconstruction—and I encourage any of you who may still need to begin deconstruction to start that process soon.

____

*1 Claude is now my AI chatbot of choice, and it (he?) gave an excellent response to my inquiry, “What does deconstruction mean for Christian theologians?” The words cited above is the first of six paragraphs produced in just a few seconds. (You can find an introduction to Claude here.)

*2 The former was the title of my June 20, 2018, blog post and also of the 17th chapter in my book Thirty True Things Everyone Needs to Know Now (2019). Then, in connection with the latter blog article, in my 8/20/24 post I wrote about deconstruction for the first time.

*3 While Palmer now identifies as non-religious, much of what he posted in his June 27 newsletter is not much different from what Pastor Jarrett Banks posted in his June 25 Substack blog article.  

6 comments:

  1. In some ways the "construction, deconstruction, reconstruction process" you're talking about is not new since transformations of world-and-religious views have been a constant in human history. What seems particularly important about deconstruction as understood today is the movement away from authoritarian structures of belief. I see this particularly in Jim Palmer's work, which I admire. I've gone through several major transformations in my own faith journey, to the extent that I can hardly tolerate hearing a sermon today operating in any traditional theological paradigm, especially those of evangelicalism or neo-orthodoxy (aka neo-reformed), the latter of which tries to have it both ways. The most refreshing experience I've had in preaching is that that I've done in Unitarian-Universalist churches where the claims of a sermon cannot be grounded on the Bible or church doctrine or the metaphysics of any traditional theology.

    Related to the issue here are some challenging questions for humanity (if there is a future for humanity): What does non-authoritarian faith look like? And most important, how can humanity create the social structures necessary for an emancipated (i.e., non-authoritarian) world of truly free individuals?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anton, I fully agree that the deconstruction process has gone on for a very long time, but the terminology is fairly new for most people and not understood by many, it seems to me.

      Thanks for sharing your own deconstruction process--or perhaps I should say "processes." After I wrote the article it dawned on me that deconstruction/reconstruction often needs to be more than just one time.

      Thanks also for introducing me to Jim Palmer. I may have seen his name before you mentioned him to me several months ago, but I began to pay more attention to him because of you. As you would expect, he says some things with which I disagree, but I find what he writes to be thoughtworthy and often helpful.

      Delete
  2. Here are comments from Don Wilson, another local Thinking Friend:

    "Thank you for today's blog post. Your reference to Thielen caught my eye, as I have been following his writings for two or three years. I appreciate Anton Jacobs' response as well. Keep the good stuff coming! Thanks for your excellent work!"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for your affirming comments, Don. -- You may (and most will not) know that Thielen earned his master of divinity degree from Southern Baptist Theological Seminary (my alma mater) in Louisville and a doctor of ministry degree from Midwestern Seminary here in Kansas City. (I don't yet know when he completed his work on those degrees.)

      Delete
  3. And now I am sharing the following excellent comments by Vern Barnet, a third local Thinking Friend.

    "Deconstruction of a personal religious religious framework is inadequate. The Western perspective itself (and where it has infected other traditions) needs social deconstruction. The emphasis on propositional truth, from hateful men like Tertullian and Irenaeus and the Nicene bishops, made worse by many Reformation leaders and made dominant by the Enlightenment, has corrupted the religious impulse, the unitive experience of awe and enchantment, and led to a civilization alienated from nature and befuddled by expectations of progress and growth with the wickedness of exploitation. Deconstruction of the oppressive power structures generated by normative Christian thought and reconstruction from experiences of transcendence may be a path to loving, humane life on this fragile planet."

    ReplyDelete
  4. I had never heard the terms "deconstruction reconstruction" used in an ecclesiastical theological sense until maybe five years ago, maybe not that long. But I have been in theological deconstruction/reconstruction for more that 60 years. And the process continues, even at 91+ years of age. And I am thankful for it. It means I don't have to throw away the Bible.

    ReplyDelete