What a preposterous question: was Jesus insane?! Those who are pious
Christians may even be offended that such a question is raised. On the other
hand, those who are highly anti-Christian may think the answer is obvious: in
most likelihood he was.
This is no new question, though. Early
in the Gospels we read, “When
his family heard what was happening, they came to take control of him. They
were saying, ‘He’s out of his mind!’” (Mark 3:21, CEB).
And repeatedly Jesus
was accused by his religious opponents of being possessed by demons. As you know,
demon possession was at that time the explanation of what we would call mental
illness.
The question of
Jesus’ sanity was raised anew in the nineteenth and first part of the twentieth
century. In 1913 Albert Schweitzer wrote his thesis for an M.D. degree. It was
titled (in English translation) “The Psychiatric Study of Jesus.”
According to
Schweitzer, the German theologian David Friedrich Strauss (1808-74) was the
first in modern times to conjecture that Jesus was “psychopathic.” Schweitzer,
however, mainly analyzed the works of three contemporary medical writers—a
German, a Frenchman, and an American—who between 1905 and 1912 sought to explicate
Jesus’ insanity.
Schweitzer’s
conclusion, though, was that the efforts of those who claimed Jesus was insane
fell “far short of proving the existence of mental illness.”
I started thinking about this topic when
reading a book with the unlikely title The
Ethiopian Tattoo Shop (1983), a collection of 22 “parables” written by Edward
Hays, a Catholic priest in Kansas. (The book was recently mentioned by a friend
who knows Hays, and I have heard others also speak highly of him.)
One of Hays’s stories is “The Hired
Hand,” a man that was wonderfully good and kind to his employer and his family.
But he said his name was Jesus Christ, and before long he was arrested as an
escapee from the “State Insane Asylum.”
What would happen, Hays wonders, if
Jesus were to reappear among us today? Quite possibly, he would be considered insane
or “demon possessed” just as he was when he lived on earth 2,000 years ago.
Then I began reading The Underground Church (2013), an
engaging book by UCC Pastor Robin Meyers. The first chapter is titled “Sweet
Jesus: Talking His Melancholy Madness.” That thought-provoking chapter is based
in part on the poem “Maybe” by Mary Oliver (which is also attractively
presented on Vimeo here).
Meyers also refers to Thomas Merton’s
reflections on Adolf Eichmann in Raids on
the Unspeakable (1964). At Eichmann’s trial, he was found to be “perfectly
sane,” and Merton found that disturbing. So he concluded that “in a society
like ours the worst insanity is to be . . . totally ‘sane’” (p. 49).
Similarly, in Don Quixote Cervantes wrote, “When
life itself seems lunatic, who knows where madness lies? Perhaps to be too
practical is madness. To surrender dreams—this may be madness. Too much sanity
may be madness—and maddest of all: to see life as it is, and not as it should
be!”
This same sentiment is expressed by
the preeminent Japanese filmmaker Akira Kurosawa (1910-98): “In a mad world,
only the mad are sane.”
According to a former employee of the
CIA whom I heard speak earlier this month, the U.S., which during the Cold War
implemented the military strategy known as Mutual Assured Destruction (appropriately
known as MAD), still supports the same policy increasingly applied to the tense
relationship between Israel and Iran.
In this light, perhaps the “madness”
of Jesus is sanity, after all.
We once had an Adult Sunday School class in our church that discussed the book, The Ethiopian Tattoo Shop. Consequently it's on a book shelf somewhere in our house. The class was a long time ago, probably in the mid 1980s. I don't remember much of its contents. It was good to be reminded of the book by your post.
ReplyDeleteIt certainly is an interesting book, and I was impressed with Fr. Hays's imagination and creativity.
DeleteExcellent blog, Leroy. Intersting and provocative. It reminded me of many of the Roman Catholic Church's saints. Sainthood does not require certifiable sanity. And you're certainly right; there's a kind of madness the world needs. The Buddha had it; Muhammad had it; Confucius had it...
ReplyDeleteThanks for your comments, Anton.
DeleteNot only does sainthood not require "certifiable sanity," there has been a type of "insanity" in most of the saints, as you imply.
I am not aware, though, of the contemporaries of Gautama Buddha, Muhammad, or Confucius charging them with being insane (mad or demon-possessed) in the way Jesus was.
Well, in much of these stories, we're dealing with ancient texts and legends, many written well after the fact. But if Siddhartha Gautama did indeed at the age of 30 leave his wife and child to wander in the forest, I can imagine what people thought. And certainly after he gave up his asceticism, his first group of friends abandoned him as having given up the quest. The Taoists wrote stories about Confucius that made him look foolish, if not also confused. And lots of people tried unsuccessfully to kill Muhammad; I'm guessing they thought something was wrong with him.
DeleteP.S.: Or did he have an aneurysm? Have you seen the TV show, "Eli Stone"?
ReplyDeleteLeroy, people thought I was crazy to try to lead FBCKCK into being a church reflective of our community. They were right. But I was right to try.
ReplyDeleteCharles, thanks for posting this. One thing I wanted to say in the blog but didn't get to because of my self-imposed word limit (600 words are soon used up!) was along that line.
DeleteNot only was Jesus considered crazy by some of those around him, many of Jesus' most faithful followers have similarly been thought to be crazy, or at least suspect of being mentally off.
CS Lewis also framed it well: Jesus was either a lunatic, a liar, or the Lord (God) he claimed to be.
ReplyDeleteIf I remember my Cervantes correctly, Don Quixote laid down the heavy burden of sanity, and became a knight errant. For hundreds of years countless readers have cheered him on. Are we all insane then, too? How do we distinguish this glorious creative insanity from the destructive madness of sociopaths and psychopaths? Especially since both have created both success and failure?
ReplyDeleteThe "real politics" that has guided American imperialism through the years seems a classic case of what Cervantes calls "too much sanity." We are so wrapped in the flag of American Exceptionalism that we cannot see the truth in the Iranian charge that America is the Great Satan. Well, if we look at how "real politics" violently overthrew the elected government of Iran and replaced it with the American-chosen Shah, we get a better idea of how the revolution that finally overthrew the hated Shah saw America as the Great Satan.
The historical Jesus is separated from us by decades of gospel writing and centuries of theological interpretations, so it is hard to evaluate his sanity within the confines of traditional theology. I agree with Leroy that the gospel Jesus was seen by many (not just his family) as insane, much like Don Quixote centuries later. May we all have a bit of that insanity!
As always, Craig, your comments add greatly to the value of this blogsite; I appreciate your regular contribution of thought-provoking insights.
DeleteIn response to your question in the first paragraph, I would say that whenever "insanity" benefits hurting individuals and society as a whole, enhancing truth, beauty, and goodness, then it is truly a "glorious creative insanity."
But whenever "insanity" harms, of threatens, the overall well-being of society, such as is built into the MAD strategy, then it is a destructive madness.
Martin Luther King, Jr. spoke of being "creatively maladjusted." He even called for a new organization called "The International Association for the Advancement of Creative Maladjustment." See http://disinfo.com/2011/01/mlk-on-being-malajusted/ One group even has "Creative Maladjustment Week" every July. See http://cmweek.org/
ReplyDeleteThanks, Michael, for pointing this out. I have read quite a lot by and about MLK, Jr., but for some reason I hadn't remembered this about his emphasis on "creative maladjustment." This does tie in nicely with the point I was making in the blog article.
DeleteHere is the complete email message (except for his name) received from a former missionary colleague:
ReplyDelete"NO, I THINK YOU ARE. KEEP JESUS HOLY. "
What can I say? -- Other than, maybe, "Did you really read and grasp what I wrote in the article?"
DeleteHere, again, are thoughtful comments from local Thinking Friend Eric Dollard. (He wrote this, apparently, before reading the comments posted above by 1soujourner.
ReplyDelete"Thanks, Leroy, for your comments on this interesting topic.
"The issue of what constitutes mental illness is too complex for discussion in an email. Jesus, if he was an actual historical figure and if he was an apocalyptic prophet, as many scholars believe, may very well have been delusional since he is represented as believing the end times, and the break out of the new world order, were imminent. He certainly was not alone in this belief.
"The question reminds me of the assertion by C.S. Lewis that Jesus was either deluded, a liar, or the real deal. I believe that Lewis' assertion is an example of the fallacy of the excluded middle since there are other possibilities.
"Nonetheless, the famous psychiatrist R.D. Laing believed that sometimes individuals, who are regarded as mentally ill, are actually the sane persons in an otherwise insane society. You pointed out this possibility at the end of your blog below and perhaps Jesus had correctly predicted the destruction of Judean society by the Romans when most Jews were in some sort of denial. In light of this, he would have been viewed as insane by the majority of Judeans."
I don't know much about R.D. Laing, although I remember in the past wanting to know more about him. And in working on this blog article I saw the quote attributed to him (which may, in fact, not be his) that I thought about using:
Delete"Insanity — a perfectly rational adjustment to an insane world."
It sounds like Laing.
DeleteAnd Eric is quite right about the Lewis quotation. Another problem with what Lewis claimed is the assumption that Jesus actually claimed to be the divine son of God--a late New Testament claim that critical scholars find unbelievable. I think Muhammad, who respected Jesus greatly, was right by claiming in the Qur'an that the Holy Other could not have a son in the same sense that human beings have a son.
ReplyDeleteI wrestled much in deciding to publish these comments. Perhaps I am too concerned about how they will ‘be seen’.
ReplyDeleteI do find the aphorism [which is, most likely, wrongly attributed to Nietzsche even though dancing, madness, and music are associated with his thought] to be apropos to a discussion of the effect of context and point of view on perception. That is very Nietzsche-like.
In some forms this aphorism uses ‘ludicrous’ rather than ‘insane’. To me, this usefully broadens the sense to funny, odd, out-of-place, out-of-step; you get the point, unusual, unconventional, disconcerting, ‘dis-locating’. Challengers of the status quo are easy marks for being labeled ‘insane’ or ‘mad’ by those of us who “could not hear the music.”
Perhaps the family and/or friends of Jesus were worried that the nebulous ‘they’ “were saying, He’s out of his mind.” Did they think he was ‘raving’ [not the word used here] or ‘sticking-out’, drawing (undue, unwanted [by whom?]) attention? Maybe they said “he (has) amazed [us]” or “astonished [us].” It seems to me that there is more linguistic warrant for claiming Jesus ‘raved’ on occasion than that he was ‘out of his mind’.
Here is a Bible verse expressing how one in institutional authority heard God’s command regarding those who were upsetting, disconcerting, astonishing the people: The LORD himself has made you priest instead of the priest Jehoiada, so that there may be officers in the house of the LORD to control any madman [‘raver’ LXX] who plays the prophet [one who exclaims excitedly?], to put him in the stocks and the collar. [Jer. 36:26 NRSV]
“Not only the reason of millennia, but their madness too, breaks out in us.” [“Thus Spoke Zarathustra”, ‘On the Gift-giving Virtue’, sec.2 ]
Dick, I am late saying so, but I "see" your comments in the same way as what you have written previously: thought-provoking and helpful. Thanks for taking the time to share such meaningful comments.
Delete"What would happen, Hays wonders, if Jesus were to reappear among us today? Quite possibly, he would be considered insane or “demon possessed” just as he was when he lived on earth 2,000 years ago."
ReplyDeleteIsn't this basically the plot of Dostoyevsky's The Idiot?
Joshua, thanks for making the link to Dostoyevsky's novel, which, I am sorry to say, I have not read. But it didn't take long to find that there are numerous people who liken the central character of "The Idiot" to Jesus.
DeleteWhat may well be implicit in "The Idiot" is explicit in "The Brothers Karamazov." In a chapter called "The Grand Inquisitor" Jesus returns, not for the second coming, but just for a visit. He is immediately recognized by a family burying a child, whereupon Jesus resurrects the child. He is then recognized by the Grand Inquisitor of Spain, who immediately arrests Jesus. What ensues is a powerfully surrealistic dialogue that has amazed and confounded countless college students ever since, myself included.
DeleteConcerning Prince Myshkin, and the Jesus of “The Grand Inquisitor”:
ReplyDeleteBoth characters help others by acting outside the expectations of conventional authorities. Their acts serve to undermine the control of royal society and the institutional church.
Perhaps Dostoevsky was aware of the linguistic relationship between (Greek) ‘existemi’, to put out (of place), hence in Mark 3:21 Jesus put [people] out of place (amazed) or put [himself] out of place (does this mean ‘out of his mind?) and ‘anistemi’, to put up, to stand up, to arouse, to raise (as in resurrection, ‘anastasis’). So Dostoevsky's Jesus raises (resurrects) the child which puts out the Grand Inquisitor. Is the Grand Inquisitor ‘out of his mind’?
BTW, in Acts 17:6 some Jews who were unhappy with those preaching Christ called them [NRSV] "These people who have been turning the world upside down.” What they were doing was ‘upsetting the world’, ‘unsettling the world.’ They were causing something settled to stand up [as in dislocating or disturbing a settlement of people]. And, surprise, the word is ‘anastatoo’ related to ‘anistemi’ and ‘anastasis’.
Myshkin and Jesus (and Don Quixote) make trouble for the status (!) quo.