Friday, October 13, 2023

Praise for the Pope

Pope Francis speaking at the Vatican on 10/4/23]

There are many reasons to praise Pope Francis. For example, just nine days ago (on 10/4/23), the Pope issued an “apostolic exhortation” under the title Laudate Deum (=Praise God). That document, which can be read in full here, was directed “to all people of good will” and was “on the climate crisis.”

Last month, I read much of Fratelli tutti, Pope Francis’s encyclical officially published by the Vatican in 2020 on October 4, the feast day of Francis of Assisi. While there was much good and important content, I was somewhat critical of it as it seemed to be lacking specificity or concreteness.

This month’s new document, however, which is a commentary on Laudato si' (=Praise Be to You), the Pope’s major 2015 encyclical on the environment, is generally quite specific and concrete. In the second paragraph of this recent “exhortation,” the Pope says:

…with the passage of time, I have realized that our responses have not been adequate, while the world in which we live is collapsing and may be nearing the breaking point.

Over the past twenty months, I have cited Michael Dowd and others who have spoken warningly about collapse, but here is a clear statement about that fateful future by the Pope.**

Also, an Oct. 4 Vatican News article (see here) states that in Laudate Deum the Pope “criticizes climate change deniers, saying that the human origin of global warming is now beyond doubt.”

Early this month, the Pope convened the three-week General Assembly of the Synod of Bishops at the Vatican, sometimes called the Super Bowl of the Catholic Church. It drew bishops from around the world to discuss hot-button issues.

Some of those issues are whether priests should be allowed to get married, if divorced and remarried Catholics should receive communion, whether women should be allowed to become deacons, and how the church will handle matters around the LGBTQ community.

It remains to be seen how, or when, these contentious matters will be resolved, but for those of us who are egalitarians, the Pope’s willingness to consider such matters is certainly praiseworthy.

Sadly, many USAmericans have little praise for the Pope. Politics takes precedence over their religious faith. Or for others, they hold to an outdated, conservative Catholicism and are, literally, more traditionally Catholic than the Pope.

According to an Aug. 28 APNews.com post, “Many conservatives have blasted Francis’s emphasis on social justice issues such as the environment and the poor,” and they have also branded as heretical his openness “to letting divorced and civilly remarried Catholics receive the sacraments.”

As an example of politics taking precedence over the position of the Pope, consider the contrast between Francis’s recent “exhortation” regarding global warming and U.S. Catholics.

The Pope, as well as the preponderant majority of climate scientists around the world, emphasizes that “the human origin of global warming is now beyond doubt.”

But last month, Pew Research Center (here) reported that only 44% of U.S. Catholics say Earth is warming mainly due to human activity—and of U.S. Catholics who are Republicans or lean Republican, only a strikingly low 18% think that global warming is human-caused.

In response to such criticism, the Pope has called the strong, organized, reactionary attitude of some Catholics in the U.S. Church “backward,” and has stated that their faith has been replaced by ideologies.

Francis reminds these people that “backwardness is useless, and they must understand that there’s a correction evolution in the understanding of questions of faith and morals” that allows for doctrine to progress over time.

Such progressiveness is one of the main reasons I have praise for the Pope. His deep concern for the future well-being of all people around the world has led him to claim that a correct understanding of Catholic doctrine allows for change over time.

Would that all Catholics, and all Protestants as well, could embrace these progressive ideas of the forward-looking Pope.

_____

** With considerable sadness I am sharing the news that Michael Dowd (b. 11/1958) died on October 7 as the result of a fall in a friend’s home. More information about his death and memorial service is available here

12 comments:

  1. Here are the first comments received this morning. They are from Thinking Friend Eric Dollard in Chicago, who also made a brief comment about the war in Israel/Gaza, as I invited my Thinking Friends to do in the email I sent them this morning,

    "Thanks, Leroy, for your comments about Pope Francis, who is trying to move the RCC in the right direction, although it still has a ways to go with respect to some issues. It is dismaying that so many Catholics are essentially "climate-deniers." They are not alone as many Protestants also deny that global warming is anthropogenic.

    "The events in Israel and Gaza are certainly horrific. I do not, however, see how killing more innocent people in Gaza accomplishes anything positive. As one wag observed, 'War does not determine who is right, only who is left.'

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for reading and commenting, Eric. And certainly you are right: the same Pew Research Center reported that only 25% of evangelical Protestants think that global warming is anthropogenic, much lower than Catholics as a whole. But one main difference is that the Catholic climate-deniers hold their position in contrast to the Pope, whereas perhaps most evangelical Protestants are climate-deniers are in harmony with, or even encouraged by, their pastors and/or denominational leaders.

      Just one quick response to your comments concerning the war in Gaza: I am afraid there are not going to be any people at all left (alive) in Gaza City other than the invading Israeli troops.

      Delete
  2. Thinking Friend Garth Wehrfritz-Hanson in Canada, who like Eric above is a Lutheran, comments,

    "Tragically, I don't think the abuses in the RCC will stop until they allow doctrinal changes regarding marriage of priests, and ordination of women not only as deacons, but also as priests. Hopefully talk among the bishops and the pope will lead to reforming actions in the RCC--although I'm not going to hold my breath, as change is extremely slow in the RCC!

    "As for the 'war' in Israel-Palestine, my heart goes out to both Israelis and Palestinians who have lost loved ones. Violence and terrorism will only lead to more of the same, and everyone loses."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I appreciate your comments, Garth, and agree that change is slow in the RCC. But there is some speculation that Pope Francis's efforts may lead to "Vatican III" (although under a successor Pope), and as you know, there were consider changes made over a fairly short time at Vatican II in the early 1960s.

      Regarding the war in Israel/Gaza: I fully agree with your last sentence, but I am quite sure this will end with the Palestinians suffering far more losses than the Israelis. It seems to me that the Hamas rocket attacks was a desperate but suicidal action. The siege of Gaza City will likely mean not only the death of most, if not all, of the hostages but also the death of most, if not all, of the residents who remain in the city.

      Delete
  3. A few minutes ago, I received the following email message from Thinking Friend Glenn Hinson in Kentucky. He, like me, is a lifelong baptist.

    "I fully agree with you, Leroy. Pope Francis honors the name he has chosen. He is in the train of Pope John XXIII. I read his blogs daily. The conservatism of American Catholics is due largely to appointees of his predecessors, John Paul II and Benedict XVI."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, there it makes a difference who the Pope is. There are certainly significant differences between John XXIII & Francis and the two Popes in between that you mentioned.

      I am hoping that Pope Francis's successor will be from Africa or Asia--and, in particular, I would be happy if Filipino Cardinal Tagle were to be consecrated as the next Pope.

      Delete
  4. Perhaps it is only coincidence, but I find it interesting that three of the first four Thinking Friends to comment on this blog post are Lutherans. Linda Shroeder, who with her deceased husband Ted were long in Lutheran ministry activities, sent these brief comments:

    "Thanks, Leroy, for sharing your morning blog. I totally agree with you in your appreciation of Pope Francis and his progressiveness. He is a gift!"

    ReplyDelete
  5. The last comments I have received so far today is from another baptist, Thinking Friend Mary Redmon, M.D., who is one of my good friends at Rainbow Mennonite Church.

    "Thanks for the blog. I have long thought that Pope Francis is the best thing that has happened to the Catholic Church in many years."

    ReplyDelete
  6. Perhaps with his voice being heard by so many, if not heeded, as does the Pope's, more pressure will be applied where change can occur. I am surprised at how many businesses and communities in my area do not practice recycling, a rather simple way to help our world. We insist on multiple layers of packaging for the convenience of smaller units. That takes more from the earth and creates more trash in the process. We have already been warned here in North Carolina we must use more surface water instead of depending upon shrinking underground sources.

    A sincere question for me as to global warming is: Given the climate is getting warmer, how much is the earth's contribution and how much is man's? I have never seen an answer. If man disappeared, would the world start cooling or just keep warming at a slower rate? I have no idea, though when COVID shut so much down, we definitely got clearer skies.

    With all the rest of your readers, I grieve over the Hamas/Israel conflict. One question for which I have no answer is: If one side declared a unilateral ceasefire, would the fighting stop? If so, which group would be the one?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tom, I don't have the time (or the expertise) to give a detailed answer to your questions, but here is just one of many similar statements that speak to your first question: "According to widely cited research, more than 97% of climate scientists agree that the planet has been warming during the past several decades and that the warming is overwhelmingly the result of human activities." (For elaboration of this see https://yaleclimateconnections.org/2020/03/causes-of-global-warming/ )

      From what I have read, it is my understanding that the answer to your second question is Yes. One of the reasons for that, it seems, is that the thawing of permafrost releases huge amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, causing greater global warming. This will continue whether humans continue to live and use fossil fuels or not.

      Regarding Israel/Hamas, I think it is completely unlikely that either side can or will issue a ceasefire. Hamas, as a terrorist organization, will most likely continue their terrorist activities because of the decades of resentment toward Israel and their desperation for a change in what they see as a completely unacceptable status quo. And now, I don't see how Israel would be willing to call for a ceasefire, as they feel the need for revenge for the Israeli lives already lost and for the complete defeat of Hamas so the same sort of attack will never again occur. Perhaps the most we can hope for right now is some restraint on the part of Israel, and it seems that the U.S. government is putting pressure on Israel to show some restraint in Gaza, although military action there seeking to eliminate Hamas will almost certainly occur and will soon begin.

      Delete
  7. I am in Minnesota visiting relatives, so my contact with news has been sporatic. However, we saw some over the weekend, and to me there was a pattern. Numerous American Jews recounted connections to the Holocaust as they proclaimed "never again" to Hamas. They seem, to me, to be exhibiting signs of PTSD. Trauma passes down from generation to generation, repeating and sometimes magnifying itself. Unfortunately, PTSD is rarely a reliable guide to solving complex problems.

    The claim was often made that the attack by Hamas was unprovoked. That is true only in a very narrow and technical sense. Gaza resembles a number of overcrowded and under resourced American Indian reservations from the 19th century. The results were frequently explosions of desperate "Indians off the reservation" that caused trauma to local white colonists, and catastrophe to the desperate Indians. That appears to mirror the likely fate of the latest Palestinian uprising. However, besides the longterm provocation of Israeli policy, there was also a likely immediate trigger. Trump and Israel embarked on a policy of creating "peace" between autocratic Arab states and Israel, ignoring the Palestinians. Biden doubled down on Trump, keeping the US Embassy in Jerusalem, and proceeding to encourage deal between Saudi Arabia and Israel, which again ignored the Palestinians

    In the movie Lawrence of Arabia, I remember a scene where his soldier encounter a Turkish army that had just destroyed a village. On of his Arab soldier began to charge the Turks alone. Lawrence moved to stop him, but was detered by other Arabs who explained that the soldier from the destroyed village, and his charge was the honorable thing to do. Once the Turks had killed the man, the Arab army attacked and annihilated the Turkish army. That man is, I fear, the spiritual ancestor of the Hamas attack. If that is all that happens, Hamas, like that villager, will be destroyed. As will Gaza, like his village. However, all across the Arab world crowds are gathering to protest against Israel. Lawrence of Arabia saw what happened when one man made a suicidal charge against the Turkish army. Already Hezbollah and Syria has fired warning shots into Israel. PTSD is meeting PTSD. Fundamentalist Christians may celebrate intimations of Armageddon, but the future looks bleak for everyone else. Perhaps God will raise up Jimmy Carter from his deathbed to tell Biden and Netanyahu to stand down, because I cannot think of anyone else who might be able to successfully do it.

    As for the original blog, if Francis really believes in Anthropogenic Global Warming, he should invite Planned Parenthood to write his next Encyclical. As Project Drawdown has concluded, Reproductive Justice is critical to fighting global warming. Already tens of millions of refugees are destabilizing countries around the world. Soon there will be hundreds of millions, maybe even billions, of climate refugees. PTSD meets PTSD. Perhaps Shiva really is the God of this world!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for your comments, Craig. (And even though you posted as Anonymous, I don't know anybody else who could/would have posted such thoughtful comments.)

      I won't make any direct response to what you wrote about the Hamas/Israel War, other than to say I was impressed by how you used events from the movie "Lawrence of Arabia" to make an important point. I hadn't remembered that part of the movie, and I realize that I need to watch it again.

      I seriously doubt that the Pope will be asking Planned Parenthood to help write his next encyclical--but with Pope Francis, who knows!? On this matter, I agree with Project Drawdown (about which I need to learn more) more than with the Pope. And although he doesn't have many years left, I wouldn't be surprised that he begins to make some shift on the matter of contraception, if not abortion.

      Delete