The title of this blog post is the title of Michael Gerson’s Sept. 1 opinion piece in The Washington Post. It probably has been the most often-read op-ed article in the WaPo this month. For those of you who haven’t yet read it (or can’t because of the paywall), I have posted it here.*
Although the title appears to be quite politically
partisan, Gerson’s piece is primarily about Jesus, about the political and
cultural environment in which he lived and about the gist of his teaching. In
particular, Gerson emphasizes that
* Jesus preached
against religious hypocrisy.
* Jesus welcomed social outcasts whom polite society rejected.
* Most important, Jesus proclaimed the arrival of a kingdom.
Granted, those three points do not summarize the totality of
Jesus’ message, but surely most Christians would affirm those points as being
central to Jesus’ teaching.
Although Gerson’s portrayal of Jesus may appear “liberal,” Gerson
has been and has remained a Christian evangelical, as I tried to make clear in
my May
15, 2021, blog post titled “Michael Gerson: An Evangelical with Integrity.”
Thus, he is not criticizing evangelicals from the “outside.”
In his Sept. 1 piece, Gerson
clearly states, “Having known evangelicals who live lives of moral integrity
and serve others across lines of race and class, I have no intention of
pronouncing an indiscriminate indictment.” Then he goes on to assert that
all conservative Christians must take seriously a sobering development in America’s common life. Many who identify with Jesus most loudly and publicly are doing the most to discredit his cause.
He then boldly states,
The main danger to conservative churches does not come from bad laws—it comes from Christians who don’t understand the distinctives, the demands and the ultimate appeal of their own faith.
Consequently, Gerson declares that the evangelical support
of Trump and what he calls the Trump movement “deserves some woes of its own”:
* Woe to evangelical hypocrisy.
* Woe to evangelical exclusion.
* And woe, therefore, to Christian nationalism.
I agree with Gerson not because I am a Democrat but because I
am a Christian who, like Gerson, seeks to put faith above politics.
Although there seems to be “Christianophobia” abroad in
the land, Gerson seeks to make it clear that much (most?) of the
anti-Christian sentiment is reaction to the questionable public stance of the
Christian Right and not to the core teachings of Jesus.
From soon after 9/11/01, there began to be talk of
Islamophobia in this country. All Muslims were being vilified because of the
vile deeds of the militant extremists. That was highly unfair to the vast
majority of the Muslims in the country, most of whom were peace-loving people.
I first wrote about Islamophobia in my 5/5/13
blog post, and then on 1/25/16 I posted “Combatting
Islamophobia.” The former article begins, “Islamophobia is defined as “prejudice against, hatred
towards, or irrational fear of Muslims.” Such an attitude has been quite
widespread in the land.
While the term is rarer, for several years now some have
written about Christianophobia. For example, a 3/27/15
Christianity Today article is titled, “What Christianophobia Looks Like in
America.”
In that article, author George Yancey, a university professor of
sociology, says that his research has shown that in the United States, hateful bigotry is directed not only
toward groups such as racial and sexual minorities, but also toward
conservative Christians. . . . . It’s Christianophobia.”
All hateful bigotry directed
toward racial and sexual minorities must be staunchly opposed. Christianophobia
should also be opposed/combatted in the same way that I previously wrote about
combatting Islamophobia.
All Christians should not be
rejected/opposed because of the way those on the religious and political right
are misrepresenting Jesus. This is one of the reasons I find Gerson’s essay so
important and worth widespread thoughtful consideration.**
_____
* This article is quite long: when I put it
on a Word document, it was over 4,300 words, more than the combined length of
six of my blog articles, which I limit to a maximum of 700 words.
** It is not mentioned by Gerson, but I highly
recommend a closely related book: Christians Against Christianity: How
Right-Wing Evangelicals are Destroying our Nation and Our Faith (2021) by
theologian Obery M. Hendricks.
I just now read a related opinion piece by Dana Milbank, another journalist for The Washington Post whom I often read with appreciation; it was posted yesterday evening and is found at this link:
ReplyDeletehttps://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/09/09/doug-mastriano-prophet-julie-green/
When I went to a mainline seminary wherein neo-orthodoxy and liberalism reigned and were beginning at that time to appropriate theologies of liberation and of hope, I had come from the fundamentalist-evangelical universe. I had a difficult time making the transition from the one paradigm to the other. I knew by then I could not be a fundamentalist-evangelical, but that was the only framework I knew. So when I heard the same theological words operating in a different paradigm, I knew they meant something different in that "language game" (to use Wittgenstein's phrase). But I adjusted, gratifyingly and gratefully finding this new universe a liberating breath of fresh air. But I was also struck by the disdain with which fundamentalist-evangelical leaders and theologies were viewed, a disdain I shared in some ways but wasn't sympathetic to. It was particularly obvious to see how the few evangelicals who attended the seminary were baffled and "lost" in that environment. At that time, then, I wrote a paper for one of my courses titled, "Please Do Not Fold, Staple, or Mutilate the Fundamentalist." (Obviously a play on the words commonly found in those days on keypunch cards.) I don't remember my precise argument in that paper, but I'm sure I suggested that such disdain and belittling of fundamentalist-evangelicalism was not consistent with the spirit of Christ. So I was making an argument in that context similar to yours in this blog.
ReplyDeleteThat was before 9/11 and before the massive shift of evangelicals to Republicanism, although it had started with the support of Richard Nixon before deviating briefly for Jimmy Carter and then swinging fairly fully to Ronald Reagan where it has remained ever since, as Charlie Broomfield points out in his book, "Out of the Pews and Into Politics" (hopefully to be published soon), even as the Republican Party has come to be dominated by the violent hatefulness of I what I call trumppublicanism. While I worked hard at opposing Islamophobia after 9/11, I would have to confess I've not worked hard at opposing what you're calling Christianophobia. My only quibble with your use of "Christianophobia" would be that probably it should be labeled something like "evangelicophobia."
Clearly the New Atheists condemned all of religion, but most people I meet don't know what I'm talking about when I mention the New Atheists or even recognize their names. I think the wider influential "guide" in American culture is from the journalists. And, except for the far right, journalists were always careful to specify "fundamentalist Islam" when they were talking about the attitudes and violence of events like 9/11. I also think journalists in the USA have also been careful to specify "evangelicals" when discussing the massive support of what I call trumppublicanism.
Thanks, Anton, for once again posting meaty comments. There is much I would like to write about your first paragraph, but at this point I will just say I was impressed by the creativity, and the point, of the seminary paper you wrote about fundamentalists.
DeleteWith regard to your second paragraph, I want to quibble with your quibble. On Jan. 30, 2016, I posted a blog article about what I called (and discovered that others had called) "evangeliphobia." I was complaining about the rejection of all evangelicals because of the excesses of the conservative evangelicals/fundamentalists. (I think that is still a problem.) But this post is about the rejection of Christianity and all Christians because of the excesses of the conservative evangelicals/fundamentalists. To say that I should have used the word like "evangelicophobia" would be similar to saying that a word like Talibanophobia should be used instead of Islamophobia--but that would be to miss the point.
Concerning your last paragraph: yes, I think mainline journalists are more careful than many secular, anti-Christian people in specifying evangelicals when writing about Christian support of Trump/Trumpism. But if they do not more specifically refer to conservative (or right-wing) evangelicals, then they have fostered evangeliphobia.
Here is the brief and pointed comments just received from Thinking Friend Glenn Hinson in Kentucky:
ReplyDelete"I agree enthusiastically with Gerson and with you. God, deliver us from Trumplican evangelicalism!"
By the way, thanks for the link to the Gerson article. I hadn’t seen it.
ReplyDeleteThat thanks was from me, Anton.
DeleteThe following comments are from Eric Dollard in Chicago:
ReplyDelete"Thanks, Leroy, for recommending the Michael Gerson column from September 1, which I read a couple of days ago. It's a good article and you have rightly recommended it--and provided a link.
Although I do not agree with some of Gerson's political views, I respect his integrity. As I am sure you know, he sometimes fills in for David Brooks (whose integrity I also respect) on the PBS News Hour on Friday evenings.
Not just Christians, but everyone should be outraged by Donald Trump. There is definitely a disconnect between the teachings of Jesus and "Christian nationalism." What disturbs me about so many people who support Trump is not so much their conservative political views on certain issues such as abortion or gay marriage (views with which I disagree), but the fact that they subscribe to so many falsehoods (i.e., the Big Lie), some of which Gerson lists in his column. And I have found that those who subscribe to these falsehoods cannot be convinced otherwise. A democracy cannot flourish based on falsehoods.
Thanks for your comments, Eric. As you, I don't agree with all of Gerson's political views--especially his views in past years. But I read almost all of his opinion pieces in The Washington Post, and I rarely find much I disagree with now.
DeleteWith regards to your last paragraph, if someone is a racist, a misogynist, or xenophobic, perhaps there is no reason for them to be outraged by Donald Trump. But Christians who have chosen to be followers of Jesus Christ (as opposed to those who are merely "cultural Christians') have a strong reason to be outraged--at least that is what Gerson is claiming, and what I think.
I agree with you Leroy that we NEED to put Faith above Politics.
ReplyDeleteIt's difficult for me to understand why All Christians can't adhere to this most Logical policy.
Why aren't we All reading the same Bible?
Thanks for reading and responding, John Tim. -- Well, Christians of all different types do read the same Bible, but they do not all interpret it the same--and they do not place emphasis on the same parts. It makes a world of difference whether a Christian emphasizes, say, "The Lord is a man of war; The Lord is His name" (Exodus 15:3, NKJV) as opposed to Jesus' words as recorded in Luke 6:27-28: "But I say to you who hear: Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, and pray for those who spitefully use you" (NKJV).
DeleteAs it happens, tomorrow our SS class starts reading Brian McLaren's new book, DO I STAY CHRISTIAN? (which you recently discussed). I am sending a link to this blog to see if I can get more of the class to read it.
ReplyDeleteWe also had a more personal connection to the issue at hand, Wednesday most of our household took a field trip to central Oregon. While we were gone, the power went out for most of the day. It turned out the only candles found in the house were thrift store religious candles. One was artistically redecorated as "Antifa Jesus." Antifa has bubble eyes, an orange squirt gun, trans flag themed apparel, preferred pronouns "They" and "Them" and a protest sign saying "F*** Capitalism!" OK, I substituted the stars. When we showed interest in Antifa when we got home, the former Catholic artist was worried we would be offended. We were not. After all, Antifa had been spreading light in the darkness. Antifa was on the side of the outcasts. Antifa is going to visit our Zoom class tomorrow as we begin our new book!
Craig, I was delighted to hear that your SS class has started studying McLaren's significant new book. (I wish I could participate in the discussion of it.) Thanks for promoting my blog to the other class members, and at least I hope that most of them will read the July 15 blog post, which was directly about McLaren and his book.
DeleteHere are thoughtful comments received yesterday from Thinking Friend Virginia Belk in New Mexico:
ReplyDelete"I think those who continue to adhere to Trump and his program are those 'white trash' who continue to feel left out, betrayed, cast out. They were and continue to be ignored by the richer folk or designated expendable, given the most detested jobs, etc. so they continue to engage in systematic racism and to perpetuate those despicable ideas to their descendants.
"Something many of us fail to recognize is our nation rebelled against the tyranny of George III in England and that rebellion was paid for by private wealth. Originally only landowner MEN could vote. Jane Adams wrote to her husband, John, 'Please don't forget the ladies,' when writing the Constitution. He, however, it has been said, had absolutely no intention of honoring her wishes. Women were still considered property of either their fathers or their husbands. The natives of this continent were considered savages; Blacks were thought to have no souls. When my mother was born, it would be seven more years before females would be allowed to vote and people of color struggled and continue to struggle to vote with the same ease you and I do now.
"The 'redneck' mentality is often that anyone who is as prejudiced as they are, are to be admired. Therefore, Trump is their hero. This prejudice covers exclusion of anyone who does not share their warped image of our Saviour the Lord Jesus Christ, who is Love!
From Thinking Friend Jerry Jumper in southwest Missouri:
ReplyDelete"Excellent, thoughtful comments today. I have only one thought. When the religious establishment of Jesus' day couldn't convince people, they played politics. What a pity we're back to that."
Early this morning, local Thinking Friend Sue Wright wrote,
ReplyDelete"I read a study once showing the history of Christian hysteria. Through the years, people who called themselves Christians have gone crazy killing each other literally and verbally through their hateful words of theology. They have banished, burned, hung, shot— you name it— in the 'causes' of their Christian form of religion. It is for that reason, past and current, I call myself a follower of Christ and not a Christian. The term Christian carries baggage too heavy for this all too human person already to tote through life."
Yesterday, local Thinking Friend Linda Schroeder commented,
ReplyDelete"Well said, Leroy. I most certainly agree with Gerson and you. Thanks for sharing."
Thanks for reading and responding, Linda.
Delete(I am quite pleased to have three women send comments in response to this blog post. So often the comments are only from men. Now I wish I could get more comments from younger people.)
Thank you, Leroy, for posting this excellent article by Gerson. Rather long, to be sure, but well worth reading.
ReplyDeleteHere are comments from Thinking Friend Jerry Summers, who retired last year as a Professor of History at East Texas Baptist University.
ReplyDelete"Gerson says much that I have wanted to say, but better.
"Five or six weeks ago, my pastor asked if I might offer classes on Christian Nationalism. This past Wednesday we completed our first session (of four), with good initial response and a positive mood of dialogue. We are a CBF church, which may account for the brave interest.
"Gerson nails it on the matter of how Evangelicals have made that Faustian bargain with DT & the Far Right of the Republican Party (no longer the GOP). He also assists me in the major question in our seminar, that is, 'How shall Christ-following believers and churches make appropriate responses to Christian Nationalism?' I'll let you know how our process goes, and how the participants help me to work through this issue."
Thanks, Jerry for reading this blog post and for responding. I was happy to hear that you are teaching a class on Christian nationalism. I wonder what the main resources are that you are using in your class. I was interested in your reference to the "Faustian bargain," for recently I read Mark Silk's 9/6 piece titled "The Christian right’s Faustian bargain" (which begins with a reference to Gerson's article.) Perhaps you saw that Religious News Service article also. Here is the link:
Deletehttps://religionnews.com/2022/09/06/the-christian-rights-original-sin/
And, yes, I would like to hear from you again about this at the conclusion of your fourth session.
Well, it is quite evident that Eric Trump thoroughly disagrees with Gerson (and me). Here is what I just now saw posted on Baptist New Global's website (link below):
ReplyDelete“There’s no one who’s done more for Christianity than Donald Trump. No one.”
So says the former president’s son Eric Trump, who made the bold comment at Freedom Fest in Morningview, Ky., Saturday, Sept. 10.
https://baptistnews.com/article/no-one-has-done-more-for-christianity-than-donald-trump-his-son-declares/
I am a Christian but I have Christianophobia. My alarm goes off whenever posters in their profile "brag" they are God-fearing Christian & Patriot after which they posts every hateful content to punch down all the others whom they think are not Christian like they are including me. They start calling me name 'radical left' when I refused to pass judgment on the poor women who resort to abortion as their choice. I am done! I am done with Christians but I am not done with God! He is my friend. After 2016, I have more friends with Democrats than Conservatives. I feel sad.
ReplyDelete