On this first level of reality, the question of what is real is seldom
raised, as there is no need at all to doubt it. But there are other
levels that many people do think about, although it seems that there are some
who are content to live their lives only on this first level. For them it may
be true, to a certain extent, that “ignorance is bliss.”
Level two: Things get more complicated when we enter
the realm of thought and reflection rather than remaining in the world as experienced
by our five senses. Further consideration indicates that much of what we
consider real is actually socially constructed.
Peter L. Berger (1929~2017) was an Austrian‑born American sociologist and Protestant theologian,
best known for his work in the sociology of knowledge and of religion. He ended
his long teaching career as University Professor of Sociology and Theology at Boston
University from 1981 until his retirement in 2009.
Berger’s book, The Social Construction of Reality (1966), co-authored with Thomas Luckmann (1927~2016), is a
classic in the sociology of knowledge. It asserts that what we humans experience
as “reality” in everyday life is largely a human, social product rather than a
fixed, purely objective given.**
In their book, Berger and Luckmann introduce the concept of
“plausibility structures,” and Berger further develops that idea in his next
book, The Sacred Canopy (1967). That
concept was then popularized by the British theologian Lesslie Newbigin in his influential
book The Gospel in a Pluralist Society (1989).
In July 2018, I posted a blog article titled “There Really Are ‘Alternative
Facts’," and I encourage you to read that important post (here). The
point is that on this second level, “facts” are only what the society one
belongs to agrees upon as being real or true. For example, for those who are
die-hard MAGA supporters, whatever the POTUS says is considered true and
trustworthy.
On the other hand, most of the rest of us are painfully aware that every
day he says things that are false or misleading. We so often disagree with what
he claims to be factually true. Our plausibility structure is based on the
anti-Trump Democrats and Independents who think that much of what he says is neither
true nor trustworthy.
So, what is “real” in this case? The answer depends almost entirely
upon the “society” to which we belong. Thus, what we consider to be real in the
realm of religion, philosophy, and politics is socially constructed, formed by our
thought-community.
Level three: Finally, we are challenged to consider whether there is ultimate reality, and if so, what that might be. From the ancient past, there have been some/many who have explored the profoundly important metaphysical and religious question of what is ultimately real.
There are those, of course, who don’t acknowledge this third level.
But I believe AI is right: ultimate reality “precedes us, holds us, and does
not depend on our perception to be real.” Most of us need to spend more time
and effort exploring, evaluating, and engaging with this level of reality.
While it may or may not be “blissful,” that is where we find the real meaning
of life.
_____
** In addition to this seminal book, Berger is
also the author of two significant sociological/theological works: The
Sacred Canopy (1967), a foundational text in the sociology of religion,
exploring religion as a protective framework for understanding existence amid
modernity, and A Rumor of Angels (1969), which examines signals of
transcendence in modern society, challenging secularization theories. In addition,
he is also the editor of a much later book of interest, Between Relativism
and Fundamentalism (2010).


No comments:
Post a Comment