Monday, December 5, 2022

Novelists as Prophets: The Examples of Celeste Ng and Octavia Butler

Good, creative novels are beneficial for their readers not just for the enjoyment they induce but also for the ideas they produce. This post is about two dystopian novels, one published earlier this year and the other back in 1993.

Celeste Ng is an American novelist whose parents were born in mainland China and in Hong Kong. Ng (b. 1980) became widely known with the publication of Little Fires Everywhere in 2017 and the eight-episode 2020 streaming television series based on that book.

Although I found Ng’s 2017 novel a good read, I was more impressed with her 2022 novel Our Missing Hearts. The title of Steven King’s Sept. 22 review in The New York Times sums it up well: “Celeste Ng’s Dystopia Is Uncomfortably Close to Reality.” 

Following what is called the Crisis, the federal government seeks to make the U.S. great again. This is attempted partly by the passing of the Preserving American Culture and Traditions Act (PACT).

Under PACT, questionable books are not only banned, those found offensive are pulped and turned into toilet paper.

Further, because of what is believed to be a major economic/cultural threat by the Chinese, there is considerable opposition to anyone who looks Asian. The main characters of Ng’s novel are a Chinese American woman married to a White man and Bird, their 12-year-old son.

The children of parents considered by PACT to be culturally or politically subversive are “re-placed” in foster families. Consequently, Bird’s mother goes missing in order to spare him from being re-placed.

The impact of Ng’s novel was lessened somewhat by the midterm elections, which turned out to be a win for democracy and a loss for the MAGA voters and the authoritarianism they were (many perhaps unwittingly) supporting. Prejudice against Chinese/Asians, however, may continue to increase.

Perhaps to a small degree, the election turned out as it did because of what can be called self-negating prophecy. Sometimes things don’t happen as predicted because enough people take action to keep those dire predictions from being fulfilled.

In that way, novelists, and especially those who write creative dystopian novels, can be seen as prophets who declare what will happen if appropriate steps are not taken to prevent those dreadful situations from taking place.

Let’s hope that is also true with regard to a second novelist I am currently reading.

Octavia Butler is an engaging Black writer whom I was not aware of until recently. More than thirty years ago she planned to write a trilogy of dystopian novels. The first of those is Parable of the Sower (1993), and it was followed by Parable of the Talents (1998).**

Unfortunately, Butler died in 2006 at the youngish age of 58 before she finished the third volume. I have just finished reading Butler’s chilling first book and have started to read the sequel.

Beginning in 2024, when society in the United States has grown unstable due to climate change, growing wealth inequality, and corporate greed, Parable of the Sower takes the form of a journal kept by Lauren, a precocious African American teenager—and religious “philosopher.”

In that 1993 novel, climate change, economic recession, and extensive misuse of drugs lead to a total breakdown of society. Beginning in 2024, Lauren experiences horrific loss and suffering, which ends to an extent for her and her companions with the founding of a religious community in 2027.

(Early in the sequel, Butler has Lauren writing about one of the candidates for the 2032 presidential election in the nation still beset by ongoing societal problems. His appeal to the voters is, “Help us to make America great again.”)

Perhaps sometimes “the words of the prophets are written on the subway walls,” but they are more effectively written in books by novelists such as Celeste Ng and Octavia Butler.

May we be smart enough to understand what such novelists are saying and proactive enough to help their dystopian novels to become self-negating prophecies.

_____

** Here is the link to “Octavia Butler’s Prescient Vision of a Zealot Elected to ‘Make America Great Again’,” a long, July 2017 article in The New Yorker. June (my wife) doesn’t like to read dystopian novels, but she found this article about Butler to be quite interesting.

17 comments:

  1. The first (before 6 a.m.) and so far the only comment received is from local Thinking Friend Bruce Morgan, who writes,

    "I am currently reading Celeste Ng’s novel, 'Our Missing Hearts' -- brilliantly written, with a chilling theme. Thanks for your review."

    ReplyDelete
  2. Not long after 8:00, I received the following substantial comments from Thinking Friend Drew Hill, who is pastor of Memorial Baptist Church in Arlington, Virginia.

    "Thanks, Leroy. My own theory is that hardly anyone reads any non-fiction these days that they don't already agree with. Most folks only read the non-fiction that reinforces their present views, biases, values, etc. I think fiction has a better chance of getting past our defenses and opening us up to new light, fresh perspectives. Novels have the power to actually move the needle in the reader's mind and in our culture at large. As Craddock used to say, 'Stories can carry the freight.' So, it seems to me, the role of the novelist has more potential for positive change in our polarized culture than all the analysts and academics. Not all novelists are prophets, but they could be."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Drew, for your significant comments. I think you are probably correct in saying that fiction likely has a better chance of influencing people to consider new perspectives in this polarized age than non-fiction does. That may be true with movies also.

      Part of the problem, though, is there is such a wide variety of both novels and movies. There are many of both, I'm afraid, that have little lasting value as they are shallow and are often just cheap entertainment. On the other hand, there are many good, analytic, and "prophetic" novels (and films) that do, indeed, have much potential for positive change, as you indicated. And perhaps one of the things that pastors such as you (and bloggers such as I) can do is to introduce novels (and movies) that are worth reading (viewing) and thinking about deeply.

      Delete
  3. I cannot emphasize strongly enough how influential prophetic novels (and films) have been for me, and I'm not addressing only dystopian but also "social protest" novels and films. Steinbeck, Sinclair, London, Stowe, Orwell, Bradbury, Huxley, Ellison, and many others! Whether we can put much hope in the prophetic power of such for moving hearts and minds is an open question. This time of year, upon being reminded of films and books such as "It's A Wonderful Life" and "A Christmas Story," I often wonder about the hearts of my fellow USAmericans, particularly those who display a fondness for the authoritarianism, cruelty, and apparent white supremacist sentiments of the MAGA movement. I know such people who are touched deeply by exposure to the spirit of these things but who are then never able to transpose their sentiment into more universal, just, pacific, and compassionate political views. Hm...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for your thought-provoking comments, Anton. I was interested in your list of novelists, especially as it began with Steinbeck. As I wrote in my April 15, 2015, blog post, it was reading John Steinbeck's "East of Eden" in the late 1960s that got me started on reading novels -- and I have made two posts about his "The Grapes of Wrath" (on May 10 this year and on Nov. 20, 2010).

      I don't know what to say about the popular "entertaining" Christmas movies, such as the ones you mentioned. I had to look up "A Christmas Story," and I don't think I have ever seen that movie. I am quite fond, though, of "A Christmas Carol" and June and I have watched it many times, in various versions, over the last few years -- and I hope that even MAGA people who view that classic (in whatever version) this year will be inspired "to transpose their sentiment into more universal, just, pacific, and compassionate political views."

      Delete
  4. Oops! I meant “A Christmas Carol.” Sorry. —Anton

    ReplyDelete
  5. Here are comments from local Thinking Friend David Nelson:

    "Thanks for celebrating these writers. I too recently discovered Octavia Butler. NY Times also had a great article two weeks ago. I am reading 'Parable of the Sower.'"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. David, I'll be interested in hearing your comments when you finish reading "Parable of the Sower." I found it a tough read, especially the first half of it. I am only about 20% of the way into the sequel, "Parable of the Talents." You may want to read it also. I would like to know what you think of Lauren's Earthseed "theology."

      Delete
  6. And then these brief comments from Thinking Friend Glenn Hinson in Kentucky:

    "I fully agree, Leroy. What an impact '1984' has had! What novelists write may touch us more deeply than discursive writing because we identify with the characters and sometimes become them."

    ReplyDelete
  7. I have read neither author, although I have heard about Butler's books in household discussions. I am intrigued by the prophetic dates. Considering how dangerously unstable USAmerica is today in 2022, collapse by 2024 is not out of the question. As for MAGA in 2032, that is not out of the question either. Trump likes setting records, and William Jennings Bryan holds a record to be the only major party nominee to lose three separate Presidential elections. Trump could get to two in 2024, tie Bryan with three in 2028, and get that special fourth in 2032. MAGA indeed! Now this would not be good for America, and certainly not for the GOP, but the kind of lock Trump has on GOP voters makes it strangely plausible. With new plutocrats like Elon Musk continuing to rise up and show their strange colors, Trump just might have a very long horror show! After all, he would only be 86 in 2032.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. When I first saw that Butler's 1993 book begins in 2024, I thought how that was the year Trump might be re-elected and how much of the dystopia portrayed in 2025 could start after he is inaugurated in January--but surely even if Trump should be re-elected things will not be anything as bad as how Butler describes the USAmerican society in 2025--and in her books the Trump-like president is not elected until 2032. But as I am reading through Butler's second volume, I continue to be amazed at her prescience (which the dictionary defines as "the fact of knowing something before it takes place; foreknowledge," but which I find as a strange word as it looks like pre-science). I certainly hope and pray that the American people will have enough wisdom to make Butler's powerful novels self-negating prophecy.

      Delete
  8. Ms. Butler's novel strikes me as one prescient not about future developments but about the latent or simply unnoticed possibilities for profound, grasping and violent evil in our general society and polity. Thanks for the recommendations. Other commenters make excellent observations about how people read. What's as revealing is reading patterns and contrasts across society--which I don't know much about--that bear comparison to reading patterns in early pre-USAmerican (I like that naming), that is, colonial society, which included personal family and personal reading in books of sermons. But that pattern was not universal as it varied from relative high intensity in New England and lesser extents in the Middle and Southern colonies. And newspapers-broadsheets proliferated by the late 1600s.

    As a child of California, I read John Steinbeck enough to catch a sense of social and political commentary. I'm past due time for reading him again, selectively, to catch the sharpness of his words against unfettered corporate greed, government complicity in it, and the socio-economic devastation an imperfect "conservatism" brought on the working-class poor.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Jerry, for your comments. As you have recently led a discussion at your church on Christian nationalism, I think you will find it interesting that the President elected in 2032 in Butler's novels is definitely a Christian nationalist. In fact, in the first chapter of her 1998 novel ("Parable of the Talents), she writes how Jarret, a Texas Senator before being elected President, was a Baptist minister, but "he left the Baptists behind years ago to begin his own 'Christian America' denomination" (p. 20).

      Delete
  9. シィート先生、ブログの記事に感謝します!
    始めに、日本語でコメントすることをお許し下さい。

    先生のご紹介下さった二人の小説家は、共に、人種差別を身に負っているとのこと。
    また、その二人が、小説というツールを使って、預言者的働きをしているとのご指摘、
    なるほど、と思いました。新約聖書のイエスも、直接的な言葉ではなく、たとえ話を
    用いて、預言をされていましたね。メタファー(隠喩)という言葉であっているでしょうか?「真理は、たとえ話の中で」ということでしょうか?

    話はちょっとそれますが、人種差別と似たものですが、私は、障碍者差別を体感しています!とにかく、忍耐しながら、したたかに生き抜くしかないと思っています。差別している人には分からないようですが、差別される側は、その人が差別者か、それとも、同伴者か、ということを本能的に感じる感覚が備わっているいるようです。
    差別と闘うことは容易なことではありませんが、シィート先生がご紹介下さった二人の小説家のように、私もまた、何らかのツールを用いて、差別と闘っていきたいと思います。

    最後に、最近、「プリティーウーマン/リチャード・ギアとジュリア・ロバーツ主演」という映画を観ました。大富豪と娼婦が、恋に落ちて、二人の人生が変わっていく、という内容の映画です。格差社会の現代に、一石を投じていると思いました。

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 山田さん、ありがとうございました!

      I appreciate you posting these meaningful comments, and I hope there will be others who will do like Anton (below) and use an online translation service to get at least a general indication of what you wrote.

      Yes, there are many kinds of discrimination, and perhaps there has been far too little emphasis on the mistreatment of people who have physical or mental challenges. Is there a Japanese word for "ableism"? I don't remember hearing talk about that when I still lived in Japan, although the Christians in Fukuoka were active in working for the benefit of people with physical/mental challenges with the establishment of Hisayama Ryoikuen.

      今後、また山田さんのコメントを楽しみにしております。

      Delete
  10. If my translation got Yamada's reply right, I was interested in the comments regarding discrimination against people with disabilities. A good friend and former student of mine, now working in Africa in the mission field but also currently a student at a Catholic seminary in Chicago, has been working on the theology of ablelist discrimination. I think it's called "theology of ableism," and it is apparently a growing subfield of theological studies. I haven't read much in the field, only what my friend has called to my attention.

    Of course, in recent decades, we've become much more sensitive to the issue for accommodations in housing, businesses, and education. What astounds me is that we didn't develop that sensitivity immediately after World War II when the world was full of disabled veterans.

    I'm not aware of any prophetic novels or movies regarding ableism (except regarding autism), but I would think there are, for sure.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for going to the trouble to find a translation of Yamada-san's comments, which I was happy to see and much appreciate. He was a student of mine in Japan many years ago, and I am happy to have ongoing contact with him.

      I pasted the third paragraph in Google translate program, and although it left something to be desired, I think it did make the gist of what he wrote in Japanese understandable in English. (The last sentence was not so well done, "I" should have been "it.")

      I thought it was perceptive of Yamada-san to link the "prophetic" message of novels with the parables of Jesus. As Drew Hill implied above, storytelling can often communicate better than direct discourse.

      Delete