Saturday, October 9, 2021

Edward Bellamy's Vision of a Socialist Utopia

Francis Bellamy, who wrote the Pledge of Allegiance in 1892, was the subject of my August 30 blog post. In that article, I mentioned that Bellamy was a democratic socialist—but he was not so to the extent of Edward Bellamy, his cousin who authored a powerful novel about a socialist utopia.

Edward Bellamy’s Bio, Briefly

The fathers of Edward Bellamy (1850~1898) and Francis Bellamy (1855~1931) were brothers. Edward’s father was a Baptist minister, but Edward did not follow his father’s footsteps and did not become a minister as his cousin Francis did.

Edward, rather, became a journalist and then after developing tuberculosis at the age of 25 he became a novelist and wrote three unremarkable novels that were published between 1880 and 1885.

The life of Edward Bellamy changed drastically, though, after his utopian science fiction book Looking Backward, 2000-1887, was published early in 1888. Within a year it sold some 200,000 copies. 

By the end of the century, Looking Backward had sold more copies than any other novel published in America except for Uncle Tom’s Cabin and Ben-Hur. It “especially appealed to a generation of intellectuals alienated from the alleged dark side of the Gilded Age” (see here).

(Curiously, while I have known of the latter books for most of my life, I don’t remember ever hearing of Bellamy’s book until August of this year.)

Bellamy published Equality, a sequel to Looking Backward, in 1897, but it was a disappointment. The following year, less than two months after his 48th birthday, Bellamy died in his home state of Massachusetts.

Edward Bellamy’s Book, Briefly

Even though, as indicated, I had not heard of Bellamy’s highly successful book before this past summer, I bought a Kindle copy (for 99 cents!) in early September and read it with great interest, in spite of some of it being rather pedantic.

The novel narrates the story of a young Bostonian named Julian West, who falls into a deep, hypnosis-induced sleep in 1887 and wakes up 113 years later in a radically changed Boston.

West is discovered in his underground sleeping chamber by a Dr. Leete, who along with his lovely daughter Edith explain and introduce West to the city, and the American society, of the year 2000. To his great amazement, the country, indeed, has become a socialist utopia.

Spark Notes (here) provides a detailed summary and analysis of the book—and even the full text of the novel—so I will make only the following brief comment about its content.

From Dr. Leete’s explanation, it becomes clear that Boston and the entire U.S. has become a utopia by the choices made through the years by the general public and not at all because of government control and/or coercion. It was, truly, the result of democratic socialism.

So, What About It?

I found Bellamy’s novel so intriguing because it was written at the very time that unchecked capitalism and “robber barons” such as Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller were causing such suffering by exploitation of the working people of the country.

The year Looking Backward was published was also the very time Walter Rauschenbusch was beginning to develop the Social Gospel—and his biographers say that the young pastor of the church in Hell’s Kitchen read Bellamy’s book.

A 2019 article titled “When Christian Evangelicals Loved Socialism” states, “Rauschenbusch never became an overt political activist allied with any socialist group. But he was sympathetic to the goals of socialists, if not always their methods.”

At the present time, the progressives in the Democratic Party are often vilified as being socialists, but perhaps they are merely seeking what Edward Bellamy and Walter Rauschenbusch envisioned; that is, a society in which the needs of all people are adequately met.

Why don’t we all want, and work for, such a society?

20 comments:

  1. The first response to this morning's post comes from local Thinking Friend David Nelson, and I am happy to share his thought-provoking words here:

    "Thanks for discovering and sharing this book and this vision. I too share a vision of a nation that is committed to meeting the needs of people more than profit. Too many of my friends have given up hope for such a vision. I refuse to stop thinking and planning for a nation that cares for people. I start by centering myself each day in reading and silence that reflects on the wisdom traditions from various religions and the political stories that embody that vision. No act of kindness is lost in the universe. No act for justice is wasted in the world. No word is not heard that is spoken out of love and hope. I may be the only one to hear the word, do the acts, but 'I am somebody' and so are you. Let's not let a broken world break us."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. David, I thought you would like this blog post about Bellamy's book, and I appreciate you commenting on it. I also appreciate how you continue to be hopeful. As you know, I have not agreed with some of your optimism, but I think there is a difference between optimism and hope--as I may write about in a blog article soon. I think, as you suggest, that we need to continue to act with hope, even when we are not optimistic about the short-term future.

      Delete
  2. And then there are these comments from thoughtful Thinking Friend Eric Dollard in Chicago:

    "Thanks, Leroy, for your comments about 'Looking Backward,' a book I read 20 or 30 years ago at the same time I read 'Brave New World' and '1984'--the last two about dystopias. I am afraid that the US, and many other countries, are headed more in the direction of '1984' rather than 'Looking Backward.'

    "'Socialism' is a much abused and misused term. Socialist. (Curiously, these same right-wingers worship the military, the most socialistic organization in any country.) Western European countries are often called 'socialist,' but capitalism and private enterprise are alive and well in all of them. One could consider a country to be 'socialist' if more than 50 percent of its GNP is based on government (or public sector) spending, but there are problems with this; the U S, definitely not a socialist country, 46 percent of our GNP is based on government spending.

    "Ideally, there would be an objective definition of socialism, based on certain metrics, which would enjoy broad support, but so far this has not happened. As for myself, I am not a socialist, as I define the term, but I am a progressive. And I fully agree with your comments above."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for reading and commenting, Eric. I find it odd that while I read both 'Brave New World' and '1984' many years ago, I didn't even know about 'Looking Backward." I am impressed that you read it 20~30 years ago.

      Yes, a large part of the problem is in adequately defining the term socialism--and added to that is the long linkage of the term with the "godless Communism" of the U.S.S.R.

      Delete
  3. Here are comments that local Thinking Friend Anton Jacobs posted about 15 minutes ago, followed by a couple of corrections. I have made the corrections in what Anton wrote and am re-posting his comments.

    "There are quite a few countries in the world that are closer to democratic socialism than the United States. And most of them are meeting the needs of their people better than we. We face in this country over 100 years of huge propaganda against the idea of socialism, and we are inadequately informed to recognize that democratic socialism does not mean totalitarian communism. I still have a hope for this country and for the world, which is probably why I feel a deep level of despair. I would like to say more, but I don’t have time at this moment."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anton, I know there is a lot more you could say about this, to the profit of all the readers of this blog, but I appreciate what you did post. It resonates with what our friend David wrote and my response to him (posted above).

      Much of the contemporary condemnation of socialism is, indeed, based on examples of totalitarian communism, but the vision of Bellamy and Rauschenbusch was of democratic socialism, and they had that vision years before there were any examples of totalitarian communism.

      Delete
  4. "I do, Leroy. Of course, I recognize that utopias have not been realized in actuality. They represent dreams of what ought to be, however, so we should not look down on utopians. Isn’t that what Rauschenbusch’s sought in his Theology for the Social Gospel?" (~Thinking Friend Glenn Hinson in Kentucky~)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, Rauschenbusch's idea of the Kingdom of God was that it is something that we can and should work for now, but the realization of it will only be in the distant future. He would have agreed, I think, with theologian Georgia Harkness (who was born three years after 'Looking Backward' was published) wrote about the Kingdom of God (the true utopia): "we work for it and we wait for it."

      Delete
  5. "Such a society is what I would like; what I think of as I vote; and pray for." (~Thinking Friend Virginia Belk in New Mexico~)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Virginia, for mentioning voting. Certainly working to elect people who will, truly, work for the wellbeing of all is one small but significant thing we can do to help form a better society.

      Delete
  6. A local Thinking Friend wrote, "On your closing question, I’d say it depends on who 'we all are.' It’s like who are 'The American People' that politicians refer to always daily."

    Here is my response:

    With regard to your last statement, "the American people" politicians refer to are primarily the American people who agree with them. But by "we all," I literally mean all the people in this country. Of course, there are arguments about the means to the desired end, but still, why doesn't everyone want the needs of all people to be adequately met. Sadly, though, there seem to be many who want only their and their family's personal needs, or the needs of the group they belong to, to be adequately met with little regard to the needs of those of other groups or other ethnicities. That is the ongoing struggle.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Bellamy's Looking Backward exemplifies what might be called the translation of Christian ethics into a secularist scheme, though to leave it at that would be unjust and somewhat inaccurate; others would say he was idealistic, but since when does science fiction (which it is in part) not get idealistic? I think Bellamy was prescient and visionary to a degree in that he was able to "read" the trends and troubles in the cultural air. It's interesting that many of his examples have so much to do not only with community but also with social communication and, to boot, some imagined technologies that could enhance human welfare, at least in the West, specifically in the USA. It has been many years since I assigned Looking Backward, across many semesters, as a reader for my US Survey students. My purpose was to provide one more example apart from that of typical stereotyped, unbridled capitalism--to suggest to students that the tradition of social and political critique was alive and well in the 1890s, and one that wasn't Marxism or yellow journalism. It's also a useful preface in part to the progressivism of the era before the mid- to late 1920s. I was pleased and surprised at the level of student willingness to engage with Bellamy (though some just weren't ready, others didn't warm to anything associated with"socialism", and some chose not to read). I think it is remains a useful critique as a visionary little book of proposals, science fiction, and by now "quaint" revelations about presupposed proper relations between men and women, and so much else. It's also an entertaining-and-not-so-grim read in comparison as to Upton Sinclair's socialist-purposed The Jungle.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks so much, Jerry, for these helpful comments. As one who had not heard of Bellamy's book before this year, I am impressed that you used it in your university classes as a means of engaging students to consider the weaknesses and strengths of capitalism and democratic socialism. (This is your first time to post comments on this blogsite, and I look forward to your posting comments from time to time in the weeks/months ahead.

      Delete
  8. Many Christian leaders in Japan were humanitarian Marxist/socialists before Lenin, Stalin, atheism, and totalitarian meanness took over the Soviet Union. Toyohiko Kagawa, the most influential Japanese Christian, was effectively socialist in leading the Labor Party. Our German language professor at Tokyo Union Seminary had been a Marxist. Although the Japanese economy is Capitalist, many or most Economic Departments of Japanese universities were Socialist/Marxist when I was on their faculty some 30 years ago. Two of my uncles are card carrying Communists--one a high school English teacher in Okinawa and another a celebrated labor organizer on Maui. I am enamored by socialist pay for our needs instead of our greeds.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dickson, it was good to hear from you again. Thanks for pointing out the different perspective on socialism/Marxism among Christians, and others, in Japan. I was surprised in my early years in Japan at that different perspective from what I had seen and largely accepted as a moderate evangelical in the U.S. My understanding began to change from learning more about Kagawa--and from Japanese Christians who agreed with Kagawa and other socialists more than with the capitalist system.

      Delete
    2. Dickson, at the end of the new (Autumn 2021) issue of "Plough Quarterly" (see the link below) there is a brief article titled "Toyohiko Kagawa: Pacifist Patriot, Christian Socialist, Incendiary Peacemaker."

      https://www.plough.com/en/topics/faith/witness/toyohiko-kagawa

      Delete
  9. The comments before Dickson Yagi's were from a new Thinking Friend, Dr. Jerry Summers who recently retired from East Texas Baptist University, where he had taught for thirty years, and who now lives in Tennessee.

    Interestingly, I also received an email this morning from another man with the same last name. Dean Summers of Seattle has been a Thinking Friend for many years, but I have not heard from him much in the last few years. But in today's email he sent the link to an excellent review he wrote of "Looking Backward" and posted on Goodreads ten years ago:
    https://www.goodreads.com/review/show/202757169

    ReplyDelete
  10. As usual, I posted a link to this article on Facebook, and Thinking Friend Greg Hadley in Japan made this brief response to the closing question there:

    "Probably because many see love and compassion as a zero-sum game. Loving the ‘undeserving’ means less for the deserving.

    Then I posted this response to him:

    Gregory, you are the first person to make comments recognizing that the question is not necessarily a rhetorical one, although that is how most seemed to take it.

    Indeed, because of selfishness, feelings of superiority and/or entitlement, etc., many people seem not to be interested in a society in which the needs of all people are adequately met just as long as their needs and the needs of their family and/or "tribe" are men. Sad!

    ReplyDelete
  11. This afternoon, I received the following comments from another new Thinking Friend, Ruth Moye. Ms. Moye and her husband, who passed away in 2019, were for many years Southern Baptist missionaries in Hong Kong (and I met him there). Here are the comments she sent by email:

    "I read with interest your discussion of Bellamy’s vision of socialism. Thank you for this. I’m dismayed when my doctors compare Affordable Health Care with Communist health care. I admire socialism in Germany & Canada. Cuba was once impressive.

    "Our family’s best health care took place during our first 20 years in Hong Kong under the Foreign Mission Board. We were later invited back by HKBTS [Hong Kong Baptist Theological Seminary] where we remained for another 20 years until Jerry's death in 2019. Hong Kong Baptist Hospital gave us a generous discount. When Jerry needed bypass surgery, our cardiologist accompanied him in the ambulance to a government hospital. We only paid USD $12 per day for a bed. The operation was free.

    "Our German, British, and Canadian friends in Hong Kong were pleased with their medical coverage back home - especially the Germans. As a widow on Medicare, I am well covered. If I were a younger American with pre-existing conditions, I would be less fortunate. Hopefully, there will soon better care for our working class. This is a religious issue. Truman believed the answer could found in the Sermon on the Mount. Then there are the Prophets. Privatized religion is not enough!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks so much for your comments, Ruth. I appreciate you taking the time to make such pertinent comments.

      We also had excellent health coverage by the Mission Board of the Southern Baptist Convention during all of our 38 years in Japan. But our Japanese friends and "gaijin" (non-Japanese) friends who on the Japanese healthcare system were mostly quite well pleased with the government (socialized) healthcare system. It is such a shame that all Americans can't enjoy the same good health care that is available in Canada, Great Britain, Germany, Japan, and Hong Kong (and in many other countries).

      Delete