Friday, July 30, 2021

Thank God for the Quakers!

Growing up in rural northwest Missouri and then going to two small Baptist colleges in the state, I had no opportunity to know any Quakers. But long before I knew a Quaker personally, I came to have great admiration and appreciation for those known by that name. 

Quaker Origins

The beginning of the Quaker movement goes back to Englishman George Fox (1624~91) and the “openings” (revelations) he experienced 375 years ago, in 1646. A few years later, the Religious Society of Friends was the name settled on by Fox and his followers. They were also called Quakers.

In spite of considerable opposition, the number of Quakers in England grew quite rapidly, and by 1655/6 the first Friends arrived in North America, where there was also great opposition and great growth.

In 1681, 340 years ago, British King Charles II granted a land charter to William Penn, a Quaker, and that was the beginning of what became the state of Pennsylvania—and a period of significant Quaker influence in North America.

Quaker Beliefs/Practices

According to Quaker.org, “Quakers are a worldwide, global community of people who are diverse in every way, including what they believe and practice. There are Quakers who are progressive Christians, there are Quakers who are Evangelical, and Friends who are . . . even atheist.”

A foundational belief of Quakers from their beginning is that there can be direct, unmediated relationship with the Divine. Fox emphasized there is “that of God in every person,” and through the centuries since their beginning, Friends have stressed the Light Within or the Inner Light.

Because of that basic belief, Quakers originally, and many still, reject having clergy, creeds, or sacraments/rituals (including baptism and Communion).

Quaker Contributions

Even though there are many differences among contemporary Quakers, the historic contributions of the Religious Society of Friends are considerable. They include the following:

1) Their consistent emphasis on peace and opposition to violence. 

Perhaps that is the position for which they are best known, and that is one reason I developed such a good opinion of the Quakers in the 1970s, when I learned about the work of the American Friends Service Committee (AFSC).

AFSC’s current website gives this vision statement:A just, peaceful, and sustainable world free of violence, inequality, and oppression.” They also state that their mission is to work “with communities and partners worldwide to challenge unjust systems and promote lasting peace.”

2) Their emphasis on equality and opposition to the subordination of women and to slavery.

Margaret Fell (1614~1702) was one of the co-founders of the Religious Society of Friends, and she was prominent in the early years of the Quakers in England. (More than ten years after the death of her first husband, she married George Fox in 1669.)

In the U.S., the Quakers were the first religious body to protest slavery publicly. In 1790 they presented a petition to Congress calling for the abolition of slavery, and the Quakers are positively mentioned in Uncle Tom’s Cabin.

Several of the most prominent advocates of both the abolition of slavery and women’s suffrage in the U.S. were Quaker women: Sarah & Angelina Grimké, Lucretia Mott, Susan B. Anthony, Alice Paul, and others.

3) Their emphasis on simplicity and opposition to ostentation and unnecessary consumption.

Friends have traditionally believed that people should use their resources, including money and time, deliberately in ways that are most likely to make life truly better for themselves and others. 

“Live simply so that others may simply live” is a saying often attributed to Mahatma Gandhi. But long before Gandhi was born in 1869, simple living was a cornerstone of Quaker practice.  

So, even though I have some misgivings about the underpinnings of Quaker theology, I say, emphatically, Thank God for the Quakers and for their 375 years of emphasis on peace, equality, and the simple life! The world now would be better off if there were more of them and more of us like them.

_____

** In background preparation for writing this article, I found Thomas D. Hamm's The Quakers in America (2003) to be helpful. And now I am looking forward to reading J. Brent Bill's brand new book Hope and Witness in Dangerous Times: Lessons From the Quakers on Blending Faith, Daily Life, and Activism, which is scheduled to be delivered to my Kindle tomorrow.


27 comments:

  1. As is often the case, the first comments are from local Thinking Friend Anton Jacobs:

    "I spent much of one semester in seminary studying the Quakers. Oddly, I did my term paper in a liturgics class on Quakerism. Was always deeply impressed and influenced by the Quakers. Of course, disappointed by that one famous Quaker, Richard Nixon."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anton, thanks for sharing this. I was unaware of your long-standing interest in the Quakers. I am not surprised, though, with your disappointment of "that one famous Quaker."

      I find it interesting that two Quaker men were elected POTUS in 40 years: Hoover in 1928 and Nixon in 1968. But what is disconcerting, from the standpoint of them being Quakers, is that they were such poor Presidents. According to a 2021 ranking by historians, Nixon was ranked #31 (out of 44), and Hoover was #36. But while Hoover was not an effective President, he was, I think quite certainly, a much more moral man than Nixon.

      Delete
  2. During WW2, the US press called us Japanese Americans "enemy aliens" even if we were citizens. But Quakers always called us FRIENDS. A Japanese pastor's wife is eternally grateful. Quakers arranged for scholarship for her to matriculate in a college in the East. So she escaped the internment camp (concentration camp) and gained an education. Taught by Jesus, Quakers turn enemies into friends.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. These comments are from Thinking Friend Dickson Yagi in California. He is a personal friend and we taught for many years, concurrently, at Seinan Gakuin University in Japan.

      Delete
  3. Greg Brown, another local Thinking Friend, sent this brief email message:

    "Just a coincidence? July 30 in 1718 Wm Penn died."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, Greg, it is just a coincidence, I guess, since I did not notice that fact while reading about Penn. If I had known that, I probably would have mentioned it.

      In reading briefly about Penn's death a few minutes ago, I was surprised to see that he died, penniless, back in England and is buried there.

      Also, I was interested to see that in November 1984, President Reagan, with a Presidential Proclamation, declared William Penn to be an Honorary Citizen of the United States.

      Delete
  4. A few minutes ago I was pleased to receive the following comments from Thinking Friend Andrew Bolton in England.

    "So much good to say about the Quakers! Thanks for doing this topic.

    "I went to schools for 7 years looking at Pendle Hill in Lancashire. George Fox climbed this hill (1861 feet high) in 1652, had a vision which really launched the Quakers as a movement. He was 28 at the time. The head teacher of one of my schools, a Methodist, told us about George Fox with admiration.

    "George Fox was born in Fenny Drayton in Leicestershire 15 miles from Leicester where we now live.

    "Quakers in Britain staff have been very supportive of our Community of Christ peace journey.

    "One Zoom group I host consists of individuals who have both Quaker and Community of Christ experience and sympathies. We meet once a month, learning from and appreciating both traditions.

    "They are the only religion to have won the Nobel Peace Prize – it was 1947.

    "I think the first document of protest against slavery in the West was by the Germantown Mennonites in 1688. That then pushed the Quakers."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Andrew, for your notable comments. I had no idea you live only 15 miles from where George Fox was born. -- Thanks, too, for mentioning that the Quakers won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1947. According to www.NobelPrize.org, "The Nobel Peace Prize 1947 was awarded jointly to Friends Service Council (The Quakers) and American Friends Service Committee (The Quakers) 'for their pioneering work in the international peace movement and compassionate effort to relieve human suffering, thereby promoting the fraternity between nations.'"

      Delete
  5. Since you say,"even though I have some misgivings about the underpinnings of Quaker theology".
    I'd like to know what they are because I totally agree embrace the principles
    You describe about the Quakers in your Blog.
    John(Tim)Carr

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, John Tim, for the comments you posted on my blogsite and for asking about my misgivings regarding Quaker theology. I stand by all the good things I said about the Quakers, but my misgivings are most closely related to what seems to me to be a defective understanding of human nature, particularly of sin.

      The eighth chapter of my book "The Limits of Liberalism" is titled "The Limits of Liberal Views of Sin," and while I don't mention Quakers in that chapter, it seems to me that much of traditional Quaker theology is closely related to much of what I write about, an object to, in that chapter. Of course, there are also many "evangelical Quakers" today, and many of them probably hold to a more traditional view of sin.

      Delete
  6. Thinking Friend Glenn Hinson, who celebrated his 90th birthday earlier this week, wrote:

    "A fine tribute, Leroy. I have many personal reasons to thank God for Quakers. They contributed much to my spiritual journey."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Dr. Hinson! I thought perhaps you would mention your book about an outstanding Quaker, but since you didn't, I will.

      Dr. Hinson is the author of "Love at the Heart of Things: A Biography of Douglas V. Steere" (1998). Steere (1901~95) was a Quaker who, among other things, taught philosophy at Haverford College (a Quaker school in Penn.) from 1928~64.

      Delete
  7. Thinking Friend Eric Dollard in Chicago shares these pertinent comments:

    "Thanks, Leroy, for your comments about the Quakers, for whom I have a great respect because of the three contributions by the Quakers you have cited. Simplicity in living is especially important as we are severely straining the resources of our planet; unfortunately, too many of us are reluctant to let go of our cushy lifestyles, but the day is surely coming when we (or our children and grandchildren) will have no choice."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for your comments, Eric. Yes, it is interesting that the Quakers have known for so long what so many Christians still haven't learned. In spite of the severe strain on the resources of our planet, as you mentioned, the "prosperity Gospel," which is quite the opposite of what the Quakers advocate, is still strong in this country and, it seems, in Africa.

      Delete
  8. Michael Willett Newhart in Maryland, who I think is my only Thinking Friend who is a Friend (Quaker), wrote,

    "I would be interested in hearing about your 'misgivings about the underpinnings of Quaker theology.' Nevertheless, I think that you have given a good summary of Quakerism. Quakers are one of the peace churches, along with Mennonites, Amish, and Church of the Brethren."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Michael, you will see my "misgivings" in my response to TF John Tim above.

      Delete
    2. When I read that you had misgivings, I thought that you would point out that they are "soft on sin." One Friend I know thinks that modern Quakers need a jolt of Reinhold Niebuhr.

      Delete
    3. Michael, I pretty much agree with you Friend friend.

      Delete
  9. Here are comments by Jerry Warmath in North Carolina. Jerry and were in seminary at the same time, but have had little to no contact until this week. He is now my newest Thinking Friend, and I was delighted that he sent commented on today's blog post.

    "I have long admired the Quakers, first learning of them, like you, through Elton Trueblood. I once spent two days at Earlham and heard him speak--a lasting influence.

    "I once went to Meeting in Princeton, NJ.

    "So I went searching and found that Dave Matthews and Joan Baez are both Quakers. Several other prominent people are Quakers or have had Quaker backgrounds.

    "The Society of Friends has an influence beyond their numbers."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks so much, Jerry, for sending pertinent comments. I don't know much about Dave Matthews and just learned while doing research for this blog post that Joan Baez is a Quaker. According to Wikipedia, "The Baez family converted to Quakerism during Joan's early childhood, and she has continued to identify with the tradition, particularly in her commitment to pacifism and social issues."

      Delete
  10. Thank you very much, Leroy. I read all your blogs and enjoy and appreciate. I had a Quaker meeting house near my house in Ohio where I was serving as a pastor of Presbyterian Church. I was told that in their worship, they were sitting quietly and standing to say some inspiration when moved by the Holy Spirit. And also, they were against the war and injustice/inequality, quite impressive as I was upholding those principles.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Perhaps we should bracket Quaker Richard Nixon with his radical opposite, Quaker Joan Baez. The folk singer helped launch the career of her fellow folk singer Bob Dylan, and remains to this day a proponent of peace and civil rights. You can read more about her here: https://www.biography.com/musician/joan-baez

    President Bill Clinton popularized Proverbs 29:18 "Where there is no vision, the people perish..." which is the plus side of vision and insight, but I feel it must be balanced by understanding and consideration. When Elijah found God in "the still, small voice" he still needed the discernment to realize that God was not in the wind, earthquake, and fire that preceded the voice. (1 Kings 19:11-13) Far too many in today's world are blown over by the wind before they ever hear the voice. I think in that we see the difference between the Quaker Nixon and the Quaker Baez.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Thinking Friend Karen Schaffner in Texas wrote (on Facebook)

    "I recently saw a PBS program which featured Floyd Schmoe’s houses for Hiroshima. He was a Quaker who did much to help Japanese Americans like Gordon Hirabayashi who stood up against Executive Order 9066. He provides a good example of active peacemaking."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Karen! I don't remember hearing of Floyd Schmoe before, but I want to learn more about him. I see he was born in Johnson Co., Kansas, in 1895 and died at the age of 105!

      Delete
  13. "Quaker Quicks - Hope and Witness in Dangerous Times" by J. Brent Bill was just issued today. On pages 2-3, he writes, "Combining personal faith with spiritual activism in the world has been a hallmark of Quaker faith and practice for going on four hundred years." During all that time, "The Religious Society of Friends, as Quakers are formally known, have been working for peace, equality, integrity, care for the earth, . . . ."

    ReplyDelete
  14. For those who would like to delve further into Richard Nixon's Quakerism, see _Nixon's First Cover-up: The Religious Life of a Quaker President_ by H. Larry Ingle (University of Missouri Press, 2015). I found the book fascinating.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Many years ago, for a seminary church history course, I wrote a paper on the Quakers. Like you, I don't agree with all of their theological convictions and worship traditions. However, I was quite impressed with Quaker families like the Cadburys and Rowntrees, who made workers' rights a priority, providing good working conditions, and looking after their employees by even providing them, in some cases, with education, medical care, and housing, etc.

    ReplyDelete