Saturday, April 10, 2021

The Tragedy of a Promising Young Woman

It was quite rare for me, but the other night after a movie June and I watched that evening, I not only dreamed about the film but also lay awake thinking for a while about the problems portrayed in it. The movie was Promising Young Woman.  

Carey Mulligan in Promising Young Woman

A Noteworthy Film

Wikipedia’s article about Promising Young Woman says it is “a 2020 American black comedy thriller film . . . .Carey Mulligan stars as a woman who seeks to avenge her best friend, who was a victim of rape.”

I don’t want to be a spoiler for those who haven’t seen the movie yet, so suffice it to say that when Cassie, the Carey Mulligan character, was a medical student, her fellow student Nina was raped at a party. That led to the death of Nina and to Cassie’s withdrawal from med school.

At the age of 30, Cassie is still a troubled soul and in devious ways seeks revenge for her wronged friend. How she gets her revenge makes for an intriguing movie, which seemed to us much more of a tragic thriller than a comedy of any sort.

Promising Young Woman picked up five nominations for this year’s Oscars, including best film and best actress.

A Noteworthy Actress

This is the third movie I have seen this year starring Carey Mulligan. After reading noted Japanese-British author Kazuo Ishiguro’s 2005 dystopian science fiction novel Never Let Me Go, I watched the 2010 movie by the same name, which stars Mulligan.

Then June and I watched An Education, the 2009 coming-of-age drama film in which Mulligan was the leading actress—and I was impressed with her again. So even before the Academy Award nominations were announced, we placed Promising Young Woman on our Netflix DVD queue.

As I feared would be the case, Mulligan was not nearly as “wholesome” in the new movie as she was in the two made ten years earlier. But she certainly played a powerful part, and I was impressed with her acting ability in the somewhat sordid role of a troubled woman seeking revenge.

Noteworthy Problems

The central problem that lay beneath Promising Young Woman was that of excessive drinking and men taking advantage, or at least trying to take advantage, of inebriated women.

A writer on the March 26 BBC News website (see here) called Mulligan’s film “deeply troubling.”

The writer, director, and producer of Promising Young Woman is Emerald Fennell, who like Mulligan was born in London in 1985. The BBC article says that she drew on her own experiences seeing drunk girls being taken advantage of. “It’s a huge part of hook-up culture,” she stated.

Fennell goes on to say that “there still isn't that much opprobrium [= harsh criticism] on people who sleep with very drunk girls. It was absolutely commonplace when I was growing up, I think probably in most places it still is.”

Of course, the main problem is that of men taking advantage of intoxicated girls. Without question, no one should be taken advantage of for any reason at any time.

But excessive drinking is also a grave problem. Nina was in a position to be taken advantage of because of being drunk, but her male classmate(s) who raped her had, no doubt, been drinking heavily also. If they had been sober, surely they would not have raped her (and videoed it) at the party.

There still tends to be the inclination to blame victims. Last month the Minnesota Supreme Court unanimously ruled that a defendant could not be found guilty of rape because the woman got drunk voluntarily beforehand (see here). That was a highly questionable ruling.

No woman deserves to be raped for any reason, ever.

As in my dream, I still feel troubled that so many women are taken advantage of—and that (intemperate) drinking is so often a major factor in the tragic lives of many promising young women (and men).

_____

** Those who have seen the movie may be interested in this insightful review article posted April 7 on the website of Baptist News Global.

15 comments:

  1. I know that alcohol is often given by all genders as an explanation for bad behavior. But you’re absolutely right that no one should take advantage of someone else when their judgment or ability to resist is impaired by alcohol or drugs.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Anton, for your comments early this morning.

      Certainly, intoxicated women should not be taken advantage of when "their judgment or ability to resist is impaired by alcohol or drugs."

      But are men not culpable when their judgment or ability not to take advantage of an intoxicated woman is impaired by alcohol or drugs?

      Doesn't (excessive) drinking cause tragic results for many women and men alike? If so, why is there not more public attention given to the cause of so many tragedies?

      Delete
  2. Here are comments received by email for posting here; they are from Thinking Friend Kevin Heifner, a medical doctor in Arkansas.

    "I suspect you will get almost 100% agreement as to the numerous good points made in this blog by your thinking friends. Since I am a clinician having dealt with and treated (to varying degrees) hundreds of alcoholics through the years, I will aim my comment there.

    Alcoholism is a disease as defined by AA. Primarily, a spiritual disease with a spiritual solution. There is a secondary physical component. There is no treatment which has proven effective for the vast majority of true alcoholics apart from a 12 step program. Addiction issues face every single family that I have ever had any contact with… Rich/poor, religious or not. If it affects a loved one, the solution is a 12 step program. As to all the other issues you mentioned in your blog… Victim blaming, rampant use of alcoholism in the young… I concur."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Kevin, for your comments and for your helpful remarks about AA. I have had little personal contact with AA or with people who were attending their meetings, but I have nothing but appreciation for all that organization has done through the years.

      The problem(s) addressed in the movie I reviewed, though, is not about alcoholics, as it was mostly about drinking by medical students. Some of them may have well been pre-alcoholic, though.

      My sister, my only sibling, is a medical doctor and spent much of her career treating alcoholics and other drug abusers. She treated their alcoholism/drug abuse as a disease--and evidently there are physiological reasons why some drinkers become alcoholics and others do not. And I have no criticism at all at how my sister treated alcoholics.

      But, still, it seems strange to me that while society mostly does all it can to prevent diseases, alcoholism is one disease that to an extent is "courted" rather than staunchly resisted. Yes, there is emphasis on "please drink responsibly" and on teaching children to drink moderately, etc. But still . . . .

      Delete
    2. Again, I agree. And I’m trying to arrive at the fundamental question… I think(?) your question is perhaps why do we have this problem in medical students or young people? Many reasons. Our culture promotes it. Overuse of alcohol is glorified.

      I have a gut feeling that you probably see alcoholism more rampantly from people that were brought up in strict non-drinking societies (conservative evangelicalism) with the attached stigma. I will freely admit I could be incorrect on that one. I would suspect the data supports that alcoholism is going to run in a prevalence rate pretty much the same across demographic groups, but I wonder if the socio-cultural stigma within conservatives lends itself to abuse more readily.

      I admit don’t know the answer but ultimately if one genetically predisposed to alcoholism and they drink, it’s going to be a big problem. But strict abolition has never been proven effective anywhere on earth, including here. So maybe that’s leaving me in a position of we need to promote to the extent possible responsible consumption of alcohol while recognizing that a true alcoholic, once they start drinking, is pretty much destined toward a very well-defined outcome.

      Delete
    3. Thanks for your additional comments, Kevin. Let me respond to a couple of matters you mentioned. The only reason I mentioned medical students is because they were the ones the movie was about: Cassie was a medical student and was seeking revenge on the way her best friend was taken advantage of by other medical students. But the problem is of many young people in their twenties regardless of their student or social status, it seems.

      I have not seen any demographic statistics about the religious background of alcoholics or problem drinkers, so I don’t know if there is a higher rate of alcoholics from those who were raised as conservative evangelicals. I do know, however, that those whose parents were teetotalers and who willingly became teetotalers themselves (such as both my wife and me, for example) will never become alcoholics. If alcoholism is a disease, I can say that I am 100% sure that I will never “catch” that disease.

      Legalized prohibition in this country was a fiasco, and that will never be legislated again, I’m sure. But there can be voluntary changes in society through education and information. For example, smoking is far less of a problem now that it was when I was a boy and a young man in the 1950s and 1960s. There was, of course, some legislation in forcing warning labels on cigarette packages, etc. But mostly, I think, it was a change of societal attitudes toward smoking. I look forward to the day, which I will most likely never see in my lifetime, when there is a societal shift away from drinking in the same way. Is it too much to hope that someday society will recognize the many problems caused by (excessive) drinking and how, indeed, alcohol has ruined the lives of so many promising young women and men?

      Delete
    4. And Kevin replies,

      "I agree with all your points. And the only way to not have any alcoholics is for no one to ever drink. The short answer to your question at the very end… Yes, it’s probably too much to ask. But that does not mean that we should not try to continue to encourage education particularly amongst the young people and on college campuses. There are some pushes in this direction that I’ve been reading about just recently with yet even more deaths within the past two weeks. So I do think there may be progress to be made on that front. It is an extremely tough problem And what I am sensing in you is frustration that there may not be an easy answer. I share the frustration but in all honesty… It ain’t gonna be no easy answer on this one. We have to push ahead where we can and find the small victories. Alcohol is too ingrained culturally."

      Delete
  3. Thanks again, Kevin! Yes, I feel the pain of the problem(s), but I have long realized that there is no easy answer for the problem of alcohol just as there is no easy answer for many other problems, such as racism, global warming, the bad effects of capitalism, etc., etc. So, yes, we keep on keeping on, seeking to rejoice in (small) victories whenever and wherever possible.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Leroy:
    All rapes are not equal but all rapes are tragic. It appears to me that there are two types of victims. There are victims who absolutely do nothing to deserve this abusive treatment. There are others who set themselves up for abuse. Those women dress and behave in a provocative manner and must accept some of the responsibility when their own behavior "goes out-of-bounds." There is never an excuse for a man to take advantage of another person no matter how provocative some women become. I have little patience when anyone harms another person, regardless of the circumstances.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Unknown," I wish you had identified yourself, for I don't like to respond to comments from unknown people. But I am making an exception here to post the following response.

      I fully agree with your conclusion, as I indicated in the blog post. But, like you, I struggle with thinking that no abused women ever bear any culpability. I know that there is strong opposition toward blaming the victim, and there is good reason for that.

      While there are certainly important differences, I wonder if a person who had regularly smoked through the years and has become a victim of lung cancer has no responsibility for his/her illness. Should the blame be placed on the companies who produced the cigarettes, the stores who sold them, the "friends" who encouraged them to smoke, etc.? No, clearly in this case, I think the person who chose to smoke must take the brunt of the responsibility for their illness.

      In spite of all the differences from a person getting lung cancer and a woman being raped, it seems that those "who set themselves up for abuse" are at least partly responsible for that abuse. But that in no way absolves the perpetrator from having the main, and criminal, responsibility for it.

      Delete
  5. Thanks for your review of this film. I, like you, (based on your review, I haven't seen it yet), do not think that such a film is a comedy. There is nothing funny about being taken advantage of while under the influence of alcohol or drugs and being raped. Nor is victimizing victims funny.

    As for alcoholism among differing demographics. Years ago, I read a study, can't remember where or the name of it. It concluded that those religions/faith traditions who have the strongest prohibitions against alcohol actually have the most problems with alcoholism. In the study Baptists were among the highest, while Lutherans and Jews were among the lowest.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for sharing your helpful comments, Garth. I wish I knew where to find the study you referred to. If the conclusion you referred to is true, I wonder how you would explain that.

      Delete
  6. Bro. Leroy
    To be human is to respect the humanity of another. If the other person refuses to respect themselves in their behavior, that does not release the first person from their responsibility to respect others. There is no such thing as an excusable rape. It may happen under different circumstances, but it is still rape. I even subscribe to a phrase "consensual rape" when one person makes the other feel so guilty or face a relational loss, the other agrees to sex even though not wanting it. To me it is nothing more than a degeneration into animal behavior. Drunk or not, Nine did not deserve such treatment.

    You may have already known my father allowed no alcohol on the farm. Frankly he was scared of the stuff because of his own previously discovered taste for it before he and Mom married. Mom's father was an alcoholic. With these inclinations coming from both sides of the family, understandably I am a teetotaler.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Tom, for your pertinent comments. I thought your first paragraph was a lucid and important statement.

      I don't know that I knew your father didn't "allow" alcohol on the farm where you grew up, but I am not surprised. And I am glad you didn't think you had to "rebel" against the teaching/example you grew up with.

      Delete
  7. A few minutes ago I received the following comments from Thinking Friend Eric Dollard in Chicago:

    "Thanks, Leroy, for your comments about this matter. We have not seen the movie, but I certainly agree with you about the seriousness of rape and its widespread occurrence. . . . Rape is an outrageous violation of a woman's integrity, and a threat to her mental, and sometimes, her physical health. Much more needs to be done to address the rape crisis, which has been with us for far too long.

    "While the decision by the Minnesota Supreme Court may have been technically correct in light of the Minnesota statute, it is clear that no one has the right to rape a woman, regardless of her state of inebriation. The statute needs to be fixed."

    ReplyDelete