Saturday, September 20, 2025

Analyzing Assassination Culture

The news media and the internet have been awash with news and opinions about the tragic murder of Charlie Kirk last week. I was amazed that his assassination garnered such wide coverage. Earlier this year, he talked about the current “assassination culture,” a topic worth analyzing.

There should be grief first and criticism later. On the day of Kirk’s killing, some spoke negatively of him. But on that afternoon of September 10, I posted words of Doug Pagitt on my Facebook page.*

Pagitt wrote, "I am outraged by the horrific assassination of Charlie Kirk, and my heartfelt prayers are with him and his family. Political violence has no place in America.”

He went on to say, "Charlie Kirk and I disagreed on nearly everything when it came to politics, but disagreement belongs in the realm of ideas, debate, and voting, not in acts of harm.”

One of my good friends posted negative things about Kirk on Facebook not long after he was murdered, and I “scolded” him for doing that so soon after his assassination. As I said to my friend, I fully agreed with what Pagitt wrote that day.

I also disapproved of others on the political left who were quick to say harsh things about Kirk, even though they were true. I am surprised, though, that according to Copilot, Pagitt has not publicly mentioned Kirk since 9/10.

Perhaps he noted how many who spoke out against what Kirk had said through the years, and especially recently, were chastised and even fired from public positions for doing so.

Ironically, Kirk was a staunch advocate of free speech, but many who used that freedom to say negative things about him were punished for what they said/wrote—and apparently some even for publicizing what Kirk himself had said.

“Both sides” need to be analyzed accurately. Despite Kirk accusing the left of fostering an assassination culture, it seems clear that in recent decades, far more violent acts have been committed by right-wing advocates than by those on the left. I asked Copilot about this, and here is its response:

While figures like Charlie Kirk and Donald Trump have pointed fingers at the political left for fostering what they call “assassination culture,” there’s a substantial body of evidence showing that far-right rhetoric and behavior have significantly contributed to the escalation of political violence in the U.S.”

And here is what Claude, my AI “buddy” reports:The data shows that while Charlie Kirk uses the term 'assassination culture' to criticize the left, the statistical evidence suggests that far-right extremists have been responsible for significantly more political violence and deaths since 2000.”

Claude goes on to say, “The disparity is quite stark - far-right extremists have committed over 6 times more deaths (520+ vs 78) and nearly 5.5 times more incidents (227 vs 42) than far-left extremists since 1990, with this trend continuing into recent years.”**

Take a look once again at the graph after the introductory paragraph at the top.

Beware of being misled by the Vice President or intimidated by the right-wing media. On Monday, filling in for Kirk on his regular program, VP Vance spoke about “festering violence on the far left.” He also reportedly said on Fox News that the accused assassin was “radicalized by the far left, by the social networks of the far left, by the ideas of the far left.”

Two days after her husband’s assassination, Erika Kirk said, “The evildoers responsible for my husband's assassination have no idea what they have done. They killed Charlie ….”

Gary Bauer, a well-known conservative evangelical, wrote on Thursday, Erika’s “use of the words ‘evildoers’ (plural) and ‘they’ was intentional. She was referring to the radical leftists who hated her husband, who smeared her husband, and who did everything they could to dehumanize him.”

But at this point, from what we know about Tyler Robinson, the alleged assassin of Kirk, he is not affiliated with any political party, and there is no evidence linking him to any organized leftist group or movement.

So, in analyzing the assassination culture that Kirk saw as defining the left, it seems much more likely to be a characteristic of the right, which was emphasized so much by Kirk and his organization, Turning Point USA.

_____

  * Doug Pagitt (b. 1966) launched Vote Common Good with a 31-city bus tour that began on October 2, 2018. On Oct. 14, I drove over to Overland Park, Kansas, to hear him speak and to chat with him briefly. Six days later, I posted a blog article about him and Vote Common Good (see here).  

** In the next paragraph, Claude went on to say, “This data comes from multiple credible sources, including the National Institute of Justice, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), the Anti-Defamation League, and academic research published in peer-reviewed journals.” 

    After receiving the above information, I saw this article with similar content on Time magazine’s website: “Trump Called for a Crackdown on the ‘Radical Left.’ But Right-Wing Extremists Are Responsible for More Political Violence.” The graph included in the article is what I posted above.

9 comments:

  1. There will surely be more responses later, but the first I received this morning (not long after 6:00) was in an email from local Thinking Friend David Nelson:

    "You are right that two realities can happen at once. We, of course, grief the assignation of any human being. All people of empathy are joining those who are saddened by such evil.

    "And at the same time we are respecting the difference that many of us have with the victim. His political opinions betrayed our countries core values. His racism, homophobia, anti-human attitude about the diversity of the beautiful human family are all deplorable.

    "May we continue to use non-violent means of expressing our differences. That would honor Charlie in his tragic and unnecessary death."

    ReplyDelete
  2. This morning, Thinking Friend Bob Hanson of Wisconsin, shared the following comments of his friend and colleague Rev Ken Wheeler, a retired ELCA pastor of African decent.

    "We remember the things he said about Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.: 'MLK was awful. He’s not a good person.' We remember his calculation on gun violence: 'I think it’s worth … some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights. That is a prudent deal. It is rational.' These are not the words of healing, not the words of unity. And yet they, too, are part of the ledger he leaves behind.

    "So what do we do with a legacy like this? First, we tell the truth. We acknowledge what he said, how he said it, and the hurt it caused. Second, we resist the temptation to let violence beget violence. For if this act tells us anything, it is that political violence has become a siren call to the unhinged, a spark they would gladly use to ignite the tinderbox of racial and class resentment. Today it was a conservative voice silenced. Tomorrow, it could just as easily be a progressive one. We must not let this become the currency of politics."

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thinking Friend Kevin Heifner in Arkansas also sent a link to the Substack post of his friend Wendell Griffen, a Black man who is both a pastor and a circuit judge. He (Judge Griffen) is a man I have known of and respected for quite a number of years. Back in 2021 I read his book "The Fierce Urgency of Prophetic Hope." And how, thanks to Kevin's introduction of it, I am a subscriber (for free; sorry, Judge) to his Substack, found at https://wendellgriffen.substack.com.

    Griffen's 9/17 post is titled, "The Right-Wing Enterprise to Re-Invent Charlie Kirk," and he concludes with these words:

    "I denounce the despicable enterprise that Trump, Vance, Miller, Bondi, and other right-wing figures are mounting to censor, intimidate, and silence people who criticize what Kirk believed, said, and did. Trump, Vance, Miller, Bondi, and others are free to disagree with Kirk’s critics and detractors. They are not entitled to our deference nor our obedience.

    "Charlie Kirk held, espoused, and made his fortune by trafficking views that were racist, sexist, xenophobic, homophobic, transphobic, and otherwise despicable. Count me among those who have the good sense to not be suckers for the right-wing propaganda enterprise to give him a post-mortem makeover."

    ReplyDelete
  4. And then not long after 10 a.m. in California where he lives, Thinking Friend John Tim Carr send this brief comment:

    "Great information, and I agree with the information you presented and the thoughtful way Al presented the information."

    ReplyDelete
  5. I do not have much to add to the discussion of Kirk's awful philosophy and tragic death, but I did find something interesting about the kinds of people that are doing these killings. Jon Stewart had an deep conversation with Charlie Warzel, a staff writer at The Atlantic, about the killers lurking on the internet. Warzel thinks many of them are neither liberal nor conservative, but rather nihilists. After one exchange, Stewart referenced Stanley Kubrick's "A Clockwork Orange." These young men are intentionally vague in their online posts, they enjoy the confusion. They are looking for attention, not making points. They are symptoms of our failing society. You can view the interview here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pf0jS4M3cKg

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for your comments, Craig, and for focusing on the killer rather than Kirk, who seems to be taking most of the oxygen out of the room. I was interested in looking up what Wikipedia said about "A Clockwork Orange." I hadn't thought about that 1971 movie for a long time, but I am quite sure I saw it when back in the U.S. for the first time after moving to Japan in 1966--or maybe soon after returning to Japan in the summer of 1972. (Many popular Western films were screened back then several months after they were shown in the U.S. or the U.K.)

      I found this paragraph on what Wikipedia said regarding morality in "A Clockwork Orange" quite interesting:
      [the quote]
      The film's central moral question is the definition of "goodness" and whether it makes sense to use aversion therapy to stop immoral behaviour. Kubrick, writing in Saturday Review, described the film: "A social satire dealing with the question of whether behavioural psychology and psychological conditioning are dangerous new weapons for a totalitarian government to use to impose vast controls on its citizens and turn them into little more than robots." Similarly, on the production's call sheet, Kubrick wrote: "It is a story of the dubious redemption of a teenage delinquent by condition-reflex therapy. It is, at the same time, a running lecture on free-will."

      Delete
  6. My newest Thinking Friend is a woman from Colorado. She was born many year after "A Clockwork Orange" was released, and I am happy to have another woman, and especially a youngish person, a TF now.

    Here is what she wrote in reference to Saturday's blog post:

    "I posted, the day of CK's death, that it was beyond time our country figures out host to reduce the number of guns and make it much harder to access them. It has taken me a long time to get to this viewpoint, and I will stand by it. He did not deserve what happened to him, even though I find what he said about 2nd Amendment reprehensible. The prevalence of gun violence is beyond what I find acceptable."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I appreciate this new TF writing about the importance of gun control. There have been a few voices calling for this, but very few compared to both the lavish praise of Kirk from the Right and the criticism of him from the Left.

      As many of you know, Kirk ironically said in April of this year, "I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights."

      Delete
  7. As several have commented, violence is no way to express disagreement. Charlie Kirk should never have been shot, publicly confronted with his conflicting ideas of the Christlike life and political behavior, yes, but shot, no. Many of us remember the horror we felt at the assassinations of the Kennedys and MLK, Jr. We should be just as horrified at this crime, especially in a country that fantasizes itself as being a "Christian" nation. My one teeth-gritting feeling comes out as I wonder if CK deserved a five hour celebration any more than the three police officers in York County, PA who were shot to death on 9/20 by an irate stalker with an AR-style rifle. How many athletes and politicians spoke at their funerals? Big time gun control won't solve the whole problem, but it is bound to help.

    ReplyDelete