Friday, June 20, 2025

The Current Need for Senators Like Margaret Chase Smith

Seventy years ago, Senator Margaret Chase Smith delivered her “Declaration of Conscience” speech. I don’t usually praise Republican senators, but Smith was a courageous politician, and the country needs more like her today.*

Joseph McCarthy (R-Wis.) was a U.S. Senator from 1947 until his death at age 48 in 1957. He became widely known nationwide after giving a speech to the Republican Women's Club of Wheeling, W.V., in February 1950.

In that speech, McCarthy showed a piece of paper that he claimed contained a long list of known Communists working for the U.S. government. He declared, "The State Department is infested with Communists.” That was the beginning of the so-called “Red Scare” that soon spread across the U.S.*2

According to Wikipedia, “Barely a month after McCarthy’s Wheeling speech, the term ‘McCarthyism’ was coined by Washington Post cartoonist Herbert Block.” He and others “used the word as a synonym for demagoguery, baseless defamation, and mudslinging.” 

Margaret Chase Smith (R-Maine) was a U.S. Senator from 1949~73. She died 30 years ago (in May 1995) at the age of 97, the last living senator to have been born in the 19th century. She became widely known nationwide after giving a speech on the Senate floor on June 1, 1950.

In that speech, Smith presented a “Declaration of Conscience,” which was endorsed by six other Republican senators. It embraced five statements, the first of which began, “We are Republicans. But we are Americans first.” And here is the fifth statement in full:

It is high time that we stopped thinking politically as Republicans and Democrats about elections and started thinking patriotically as Americans about national security based on individual freedom. It is high time that we all stopped being tools and victims of totalitarian techniques—techniques that, if continued here unchecked, will surely end what we have come to cherish as the American way of life.

Sen. Smith called for the country, the Senate, and the Republican Party to re-examine the tactics used by the House Un-American Activities Committee, and (without naming him) Senator McCarthy.

Where are the senators like Margaret Chase Smith today? Despite all the malicious things done and said by the current POTUS, to this point there has been hardly any dissenting voice coming from the Republican senators (or House representatives). This is a real and present danger to the U.S.

Eminent lawyer and law professor Alan Dershowitz’s book War on Woke: Why the New McCarthyism Is More Dangerous Than the Old was published last year, and it merits our attention.

Dershowitz contends that the new McCarthyism challenges the basic tenets of the classic liberal (in the traditional sense) state: Freedom of expression; due process; presumption of innocence, right to counsel, equal application of the law; and tolerance and respect for differing viewpoints.*3

I disagree with the honorable law professor when in the Introduction he states that the “bedrock principles” just mentioned are “rejected by McCarthyite extremists on both the hard left and the hard right.” He seems to go out of his way to endorse “bothsidesism.”

All the “basic tenets” mentioned above are being primarily disregarded by the President and ignored by the top Republican politicians.

Now, five full months after the inauguration of Trump 2.0, is high time for conscientious Republican senators and House members to step up and speak out against the undemocratic policies of the POTUS and his tendency toward embracing fascism.

There is some limited Republican opposition to Pres. Trump, dating back to his first term. That is mainly seen in Sen. Susan Collins (from Maine, like Smith), Sen. Lisa Murkowski (Alaska), and also Sen. Mitch McConnell (Ky.) since 2024.

Currently, there is also some opposition by fiscal conservatives such as Sen. Rand Paul (also from Ky.) and Ron Johnson (Wis.).

In addition, there are also a few GOP senators opposing the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” passed by the House at the end of May. That opposition is seen mostly in statements made by Senators Josh Hawley (Mo.), Jerry Moran (Kan.), Thom Tillis (N.C.), and John Curtis (Utah).

Still, most Republican senators vote in lockstep with the President. What the country badly needs, though, are politicians like Senator Margaret Chase Smith, who for the good of the nation will speak out against not only their own Party’s senators but especially the President.

_____

*1 I am indebted to Heather Cox Richardson for prompting me to write this blog article. Her May 31 newsletter was a long, informative piece about Sen. Smith.

*2 It is noteworthy that Clay Risen’s 460-page book Red Scare: Blacklists, McCarthyism, and the Making of Modern America was published earlier this year. He writes in the Preface that “Trumpism and the MAGA movement” is not the same “as McCarthyism and the John Birch Society. But there is a line linking them” (viii). It is also worth noting that McCarthy's primary lawyer, Roy Cohn (1927~86), was also Donald Trump's lawyer in 1973 when the Justice Department accused Trump of violating the Fair Housing Act.

*3 Dershowitz (born in 1938 and about two weeks younger than me) became Harvard Law School's youngest full professor and is now Emeritus Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law.

 

11 comments:

  1. Yes, more senators like Margaret Chase Smith. Even assuming that all three of the GOP senators mentioned as being somewhat independent were to unite against the big ugly bill along with all 47 Democrat senators, one more would be needed to break the 50/50 tie. The fiscally conservative GOP senators seem to be more interested in even deeper cuts than the House bill. I'm not optimistic about finding more Margaret Chase Smith types in the current GOP. My hope is to hang on to a measure of representative democracy until 2026 and hopefully a blue wave to stop further anti democratic legislation, and maybe in 2029 (which I am not likely to see) begin the process of rebuilding the extreme damage already done.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for your comments, Charles. I am glad that I have a Thinking Friend (you) who took seriously what I posted this morning. I keep thinking that surely there will be one or two GOP Senators who before long will have the courage to do what is good for the nation rather than just obediently kowtow to Trump. But your pessimistic view may, sadly, be more realistic.

      I keep saying that there will surely be a big Blue wave in 2026, but as I have also said before, my biggest fear is that Trump will declare some "emergency" that will (in his mind) allow him to call off the mid-term elections. But be that as it may, I hope that you and I both live long enough to see "the process of rebuilding" with an energetic Democratic President inaugurated in January 2029.

      Delete
  2. Alan Dershowitz is a problematic reference to use. He was a brilliant defense lawyer, but a threat to good public policy. For instance, when Jimmy Carter published Palestine: Peace not Apartheid in 2006, Dershowitz tried to debate Carter against Carter's book, which Carter refused. Dershowitz's 2024 book War on Woke: Why the New McCarthyism Is More Dangerous than the Old is Dershowitz's war on woke, not a defense of woke against MAGA. He is so radical in his defense of civil liberties, which is fine when defending unpopular criminal defendants, such as O. J. Simpson, that in discussing social movements such as woke, his libertarianism leads him to attack civil rights movements. He even ended up attacking the American Civil Liberties Union. When I looked up his book, the next book suggested was Ted Cruz's Unwoke: How to Defeat Cultural Marxism in America. In the end, he in some ways has become Donald Trump's replacement for Roy Cohn, who once went on from being McCarthy's lawyer to being Trump's lawyer. I am not saying Dershowitz did anything illegal or unprofessional in the ways the Cohn did, but he has unfortunately gone beyond being just Trump's vigorous impeachment defense lawyer.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Craig, I apologize for being so slow to respond to your comments. I have been reading more, and thinking more, about Dershowitz since your posted your comments on Saturday.

      I take Dershowitz at his word when he writes in the Introduction of his 2024 book that he focuses more on left-wing McCarthyism "than on its rightwing counterpart ... precisely because my political sympathies are closer to the left than to the right" (4). Then on the next page he states that he generally supports "much of the agenda of the left, especially the center-left."

      Although he is said to be a secular Jew, it seems to me that his main objection to what he calls left-wing McCarthism is due to its criicism of Israel because of the ongoing warfare in Gaza. As so many others, he seems to think being pro-Palestinian in the case of Gaza and the West Bank is to be anti-Semitic. The fifth (and longest) chapter of his book is "International McCarthyism: Israel, Anti-Semitism, and the World." The last sub-section of that long chapter is "Pro-Palestinian Pied Pipers are Lading Your Children to the River and the Sea."

      Interestingly, the next-to-last sub-section is "Why Don't We Want a War with Iran?" I can't find any statement attributed to him since Trump's massive bombing of the nuclear sites in Iran, but Dershowitz is most likely in full support of that action--in spite of the fact that many see that bombing as being unconstitutional.

      Delete
  3. Unfortunately there seem to be Zero Republicans of any consequence that would approach Margaret Chase Smith in integrity. And so far in 2025 The Democrats, not helped by the so called mainstream media (not including podcasts watched by other progressives) Are not yet laying much visible groundwork for upending the GOP/MAGA Congress in 2026. They need to start Now. I was a Young Republic in college (when it was possible to do so as a Liberal rpt liberal). Times have changed. The Democrats need to coalesce and show some spine (a la Cory Booker's marathon speech). And it's not to early to be looing for a "winnable" candidate for President in 2028. Someone who can start to rebuild after the rubble that the Republicans are creating with only a few visible obstacles.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for your comments, Rick. Since you are a political scientist, I deem your comments to be of special importance. But perhaps more than you, and certainly more than the mainstream media, I think there are several Democrats who stand of good chance of being elected President in 2028. Sen. Booker would be my first choice, but in addition, I think the following would also electable: Gov. Andy Beshear of Ky., Sen. Chris Murphy of Conn., former mayor of Chicago (and former Ambassador to Japan) Rahm Emanuel, and Sen. Alex Padilla of Calif. (I have not included any women on this list, for it seems to me since the Democratic Party has lost two elections out of the last three with a woman candidate, the 2028 candidate needs to be a man.) As regards the mid-term elections next year, perhaps I am overly optimistic, but at this point (as I wrote above in response to Charles Kiker), I think a big Blue wave is highly likely.

      Delete
  4. Thinking Friend Virginia Belk of New Mexico sent me an email just before noon with these comments:

    "I remember when Margaret Chase Smith literally threw her flower and ribbon bedecked straw hat into the ring as a candidate for president! Of course, the convention didn't select her as their nominee, but she was, indeed, a role model for senators! Yes, we very much need more like her in this day and age."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, Sen. Smith was a candidate for the Republican presidential nomination in the 1964 election. She was the first woman to be placed in nomination for the presidency at a major party's convention.

      Delete
  5. About an hour earlier, a local Thinking Friend who is a few years older than me, wrote, "I can still hear Smith’s voice. I do not think anyone [now] has the courage to challenge the status quo."

    ReplyDelete
  6. About an hour ago, I receive the following brief comments from Thinking Friend Jerry Jumper in southwest Missouri:

    "My feeling is that elected Republicans are more concerned about keeping their jobs than doing what they know is right. Pretty sad.

    ReplyDelete
  7. As usual I enjoy the comments you receive, Bro. Leroy, but also too late as usual to be read by others. I remember Sen. Smith only from history books. What she stood for deserves to be remembered more than it has been. The comment made above is the secret to our nation's future. We need more loyal Americans in Congress and fewer party loyalists. What impact would it have if, instead of going to the streets, a communication campaign in any form was begun to contact representatives and senators telling them to vote either against Trump's plans or lose our vote? Would twenty million phone calls, letters, or emails make a difference? Are we looking at a fear of losing their link to Trump so great they would rather face the prospect of being voted out of office than make the wanna-be-king angry?

    ReplyDelete