Tuesday, February 9, 2021

The Inaugurations of 1865 and 2021

It has been three weeks since the inspirational inauguration of President Joe Biden. There are some distinct differences and a significant similarity between that inauguration on January 20 and President Lincoln’s second inauguration on March 4, 1865.

The Inauguration of 1865

This Friday is 2.12 and the 212th birthday anniversary of Abraham Lincoln. Perhaps the most often quoted POTUS in American history, his short Second Inaugural Address was one of his most powerful speeches.

Lincoln won the 1864 election, held during the Civil War, as the candidate of the National Union Party (made up of Republicans and “War Democrats”). He defeated Democratic candidate George McClellan with 55% of the popular vote and with a whopping 212-21 advantage in the Electoral College.

Lincoln’s inaugural address the following March ended with these impressive words:

With malice toward none with charity for all with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right let us strive on to finish the work we are in to bind up the nation's wounds, to care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow and his orphan ~ to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations.

(Here is the link to that 3/4/1865 inaugural address, which was only a tad over 700 words long. At that link you can both read the speech and hear it read. And this is the link to my blog post in 2/2015, which was mostly about that remarkable address.) 

The Inauguration of 2021

President Biden’s inaugural address was a solid one, but perhaps there were not a lot of memorable statements. The following words spoken to the international community, though, are noteworthy:

America has been tested and we’ve come out stronger for it. We will repair our alliances and engage with the world once again, not to meet yesterday’s challenges but today’s and tomorrow’s challenges. And we’ll lead not merely by the example of our power, [but] by the power of our example. We’ll be a strong and trusted partner for peace, progress, and security.

The most memorable words at the inauguration were spoken by Amanda Gorman, the dynamic young inaugural poet. She ended her poem, “The Hill We Climb,” with these words articulated with her immaculate diction,

The new dawn blooms as we free it
For there is always light,
if only we're brave enough to see it
If only we're brave enough to be it.

(In case you want to hear/read Gorman’s poem again, here is a link to it.)

Differences and a Similarity

The Senate’s second impeachment trial of Donald J. Trump is set to begin today. As you know, the House of Representatives voted on January 13 to impeach the 45th POTUS. The tally was 232-197 with ten Republicans and all the Democrats voting to impeach DJT for “incitement of insurrection.”

Before that vote, however, House Republican Whip Steve Scalise cited Lincoln’s words about having “malice toward none” in voicing his opposition to impeachment.

Scalise ended his appeal for acquittal of DJT: "Madam Speaker, in times like these, let’s not reach for our darkest demons but instead, like Lincoln, seek the higher ground.”

Then, in the week following Biden’s inauguration, former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley portrayed Trump as a victim of ill will and exclaimed “Give the man a break! . . . move on.”

Seeking to convince lawbreakers—or high government officials inciting insurrection—is not done because of malice, though. It is done for the sake of justice and with the intent of keeping society—or democracy—safe.

Lincoln’s second inaugural address was near the end of a long civil war in which perhaps up to 750,000 soldiers had died—and he had won the election by a huge landslide.

By contrast, Biden’s inaugural address was after a disputed election, just two weeks after an attempted insurrection, and with extensive armed protection, for it was not known what the insurgents might do to disrupt the festive events of January 20.

One thing is clearly the same now as in 1865, though: we all want a “just and lasting peace.”

7 comments:

  1. Here are comments from Thinking Friend Eric Dollard in Chicago:

    "Thanks, Leroy, for the comparison of the 1865 and 2021 presidential inauguration speeches. In addition to the uplifting words in those speeches, I too was very impressed by the words and poise of the young poet, Amanda Gorman.

    "The impeachment trial of Donald Trump gives me conflicting feelings. I really do not want Trump at the top of the news again, or in the news at all, but there must be consequences for malfeasance and misbehavior by public officials. It appears unlikely that Trump will be convicted by the Senate, but perhaps he can be barred from ever holding public office again."

    ReplyDelete
  2. Then, I received the following comments from Thinking Friend Andrew Bolton in Leicester, England.

    "Thanks for this reflection on inaugurations and impeachment.

    "Should there be one law for everyone or one law for the rich and powerful and another law for the poor and powerless? One law for a white president and a white mob storming congress and another law for blacks in the inner city? Or is it American to rigorously insist that America be a place with equal 'justice for all.'

    "I am not sure the election is disputable in the end. Over here in the UK the BBC and the Guardian newspaper both rigorously reported the US elections. Both sources do not have an axe to grind about US politics, and both have a reputation for accurate reporting. Both dismissed repeatedly Mr Trump’s claim that the elections were fraudulent. The Guardian did report on significant issues that need to be addressed in US elections that benefit Republicans: voter suppression, gerrymandering districts, dark money, the electoral college system (how can a candidate win the popular vote and still not be president like in most other democracies?) I voted as an overseas voter, informed also by daily reading of the Kansas City Star. It upset me that my postal ballot might not have counted in a process that has had established integrity for years."

    ReplyDelete
  3. Nice, Leroy! Well, we are currently under the sign of Aquarius. Dare we hope for the Age of Aquarius?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Anton, but I have never taken astrology seriously--or paid a lot of attention to "the Age of Aquarius." According to Wikipedia, "The expression Age of Aquarius in popular culture usually refers to the heyday of the hippie and New Age movements in the 1960s and 1970s." But that was during our first years in Japan, so we were somewhat out of touch with the hippie and New Age movements here in the States even though we read some about them, of course--and I remember the 1967 song. Still, I don't know how to answer your question. What are your hopes?

      Delete
    2. Another excellent Blog Leroy and this is definitely a Save.
      Your comments are so True and I wise our Leaders could read your Blogs.
      See if you can send your Blogs to All our Leaders-both Local and National.
      Blessings to you Leroy and may our Gracious&Merciful LORD continue to Give you the Strength&Wisdom to continue your Blogs until we All go to our Rightful home in Heaven.
      In His Precious name,
      John Tim Carr

      Delete
  4. Here are comments from Thinking Friend Truett Baker in Arizona:

    "Certainly there are similar sentiments expressed by both presidents, Lincoln and Biden, to begin healing and striving for lasting peace. During the Civil War, the South strongly believed in their cause and in a Divine support for that cause. There was no 'righteous cause' behind Donald Trump's malicious intent to cause division and even rebellion. His support and encouragement for rebellion came at the end of a presidency filled with malice, deceit and falsehood. Such behavior cannot be ignored nor allow for the possibility for a repeat in a similar future presidency. I just hope that the Republican senators have the courage to do what they know is right in expressing their disapproval of their former president's behavior and culture."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Truett, I think you stated the matter well.

      Delete