Just as in 1968, racial tension in the U.S. has been rampant these last few months in 2020, and, again, just like back then, one presidential candidate is calling for LAW AND ORDER. But what is the most pressing need for People of Color, and how can the current unrest best be addressed?
Are Reparations the Answer?
There have been strong calls by some for the
U.S. government to provide reparations to the descendants of Black people who
were formerly enslaved. In his long, oft-cited June 2014 piece in The Atlantic,
Ta-Nehisi Coates makes a strong appeal for reparations.
If it could have been arranged, this month
would have been a fitting time for reparations to be paid, for it was 170 years
ago on September 18, 1850, that the Fugitive Slave Act was passed by the U.S.
Congress, making the enslavement of Blacks in the South even more secure—and
more odious.
Harriet Tubman escaped slavery in 1849, but
then her daring work freeing other slaves by means of the Underground Railroad
was made even more dangerous and challenging after the Fugitive Slave Act took
effect the next year.
But there are many problems with reparations:
how could it be satisfactorily determined who is eligible for reparations after
all these years, and how could adequate funding be provided? With the massive
expenditures on covid-19 relief this year, there is no possibility of funding
being provided now, even if there were the will to do so.
Reparations are most likely not the answer to the problem of racial unrest in this country for the foreseeable future—or ever.
Is Friendship the Answer?
There has been much talk over the last sixty
years about the need for racial reconciliation and for eliminating the
segregation of Blacks and whites.
Near the beginning of “A Segregated Church or a
Beloved Community,” the sixth chapter in his 2016 book America’s Original
Sin, Jim Wallis recounts how in the 1950s Martin Luther King, Jr., sadly
said, “I am [ashamed] and appalled that eleven o’clock on Sunday morning is the most segregated hour in Christian America.”
Then Wallis went on to lament that still now “the
racial segregation of US churches is nothing short of scandalous and sinful”
(Kindle ed., pp. 97, 98).
While I strongly believe that churches should
never be segregated because of unwillingness to accept people of different
races/ethnicities and have long regretted not being a part of a church here in
the U.S. with a significant number of People of Color, I now think that
integration is not the primary goal we whites should seek.
Last month, Jennifer Harvey, a religion
professor at Drake University in Iowa, wrote a powerful opinion
piece for CNN. While her piece was largely in
support of reparations, I was struck by her disparagement of all the work that
has been done for “racial reconciliation” and the emphasis in recent years on
“diversity and inclusion.”
Harvey insists that “we need to be clear that
friendships are never a substitute for justice.”
Thus, while definitely important,
friendship/reconciliation is not the primary answer to the problem of racial
unrest abroad in the land.
The Need for Justice/Equity
In her highly acclaimed book Caste (2020), Isabel Wilkerson writes, “We are
not personally responsible for what people who look like us did centuries ago.
But we are responsible for what good or ill we do to people alive with us today”
(p. 387).
Accordingly,
rather than focusing on reparations for the past, what is needed most now is
the creation of a more just, equitable society.
If
we whites want to help People of Color (PoC) have better lives in this
still-racist society, we need to focus most on legislation and law enforcement
that, among other things, combats police brutality against PoC; corrects the
inequities in the prison justice system; and eliminates discrimination in
housing and discriminatory finance charges for both houses and cars.
To
do this we can support various nationwide organizations, such as the ACLU, for
example, which urges us to Demand Justice Now.
You know my view. Reparations should not be in the form of cash. And sweep away the issue of who is actually a descendant of a slave! For the next three generations, simply guarantee every African American a job with a living wage and a free college education. The one objection I received to that proposal that makes sense to me is that everyone should be guaranteed that.
ReplyDeleteThanks for your comments, Anton. I fully agree that one of the first and most important things that might be done is to provide a universal basic income ("A universal basic income provides everyone with a minimum living wage, whether they are employed or otherwise.") as well as universal healthcare to all African Americans--but I also agree with the objections you have received: why stop with People of Color? Of course, the main problem is financing such a program.
DeleteI also favor providing a free college education to all African Americans who can meet minimal academic requirements and who would not be able to attend college without financial support. But I cannot agree that we taxpayers, or anyone, ought to be expected to provide free education for the wealthy--such as the many Black professional athletes, actors, rappers, businessmen, etc. who don't need the financial help for their children. I am completely in favor of social justice and equity, but I see no need to give extra benefits to those who are already privileged far above most people, regardless of color.
The first comment received this morning was before 7 a.m., and it was from Thinking Friend Dan O'Reagan in Louisiana. He wrote much more in his email, but he started,
ReplyDelete"I appreciate you and your call for justice. But, justice is a legal term that belongs in the courts, not with the mobs in the streets. Mob rule is not justice for anybody."
Thanks for writing, Dan. It was good to hear from you again.
DeleteIn response, let me say that the justice I wrote about is social justice, which is certainly not just a matter matter for the courts, although, of course, legislation is necessary for the implementation of social justice in many respects. The Wikipedia article on social justice begins (and I think it is a good, concise, and accurate definition):
"Social justice is a concept of fair and just relations between the individual and society, as measured by the distribution of wealth, opportunities for personal activity, and social privileges."
Further, no thoughtful person I know of supports "mob rule." Many of us do understand, though, the frustration and anger expressed by the "mobs" when they have a clear sense of unjust treatment in contemporary American society.
Those in power and privilege, though, don't like it when there are protests in the streets (or harbors). King George and his supporters were upset, for example, when there was a Boston Tea Party in 1773 and when the "mobs" were protesting “taxation without representation.”
Then about half an hour later, Thinking Friend Eric Dollard in Chicago sent helpful comments, as he often does:
ReplyDelete"Thanks for bringing this up, Leroy.
"While I do not favor direct reparations, I do favor a massive public investment in inner city neighborhoods (as well as Appalachia). The black community needs to achieve economic parity with the white community in order to be on a firmer footing in fighting racism and prejudice.
"The public investment should be for better policing; health clinics and government-funded health insurance; top-notch neighborhood schools, especially at the elementary level; mortgage and home maintenance assistance; improved infrastructure; and jobs. We have never seriously invested in communities in which people of color largely reside. Once the public investment is made, private investment will follow.
"The idea is to build stable, safe communities on a foundation of home ownership and neighborhood schools. Most of the funding for this will have to come from the federal government, but the current political climate is not encouraging, even though Congress has no problem finding $700 billion each year to fund our bloated Defense Department or in finding tax cuts for corporations and the wealthy.
"With respect to the police, community trust needs to be established so that communities and the police can work together to maintain public safety. The police are under enormous stress and four police officers have already committed suicide this year in Chicago. Better and longer training is needed. I would also recommend taking the police out of drug enforcement, which seems to be the source of many problems, and instead emphasize drug counseling and rehab.
"(BTW, I read 'Caste' last month. It should be required reading for every American.)"
Thanks, Eric, for your comments. You amplified well the main point I was trying to make toward the end of my article, and I appreciate your helpful suggestions.
DeleteHere are brief, and appreciated, comments from local Thinking Friend Temp Sparkman:
ReplyDelete"I first heard David Brooks suggest this strategy on NPR. I agreed with him, and now strongly with you. Thanks for the healing word."
Thanks, Temp, for your comments and for your reference to David Brooks. I couldn't find a link tothe NPR broadcast, but I found an opinion piece by Brooks in the June 4 issue of The New York Times; I assume it is similar to what he said. (Here is the link to that article by Brooks: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/04/opinion/united-states-reparations.html)
DeleteI also received the following brief, and appreciated, comments from Thinking Friend Glenn Hinson in Kentucky:
ReplyDelete"A thoughtful essay, Leroy. I think we could learn from South Africans, especially Archbishop Tutu and the Reconciliation Commission. They did some of all three of the things you consider here. The key was leadership!"
Thanks, Dr. Hinson, for your comments--and for referring to Archbishop Tutu and the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) in South Africa. I am currently reading the book "Everyday Ubuntu" by Tutu's granddaughter, and she talks about the TRC and how important it was for restorative justice in SA.
DeleteFor sure, friendship/integration and maybe some sort of reparation are important, and I don't want to in any way downplay their importance, but my point is that seeking social justice, such as the TRC did, is of primary importance.
Here is an even briefer comment from local Thinking Friend Ann Henning:
ReplyDelete"Also the Southern Poverty Law Center."
And here is my response: Yes, Ann, from soon after June and I returned to the States in 2004 we have been supporters of the SPLC, and I appreciate you mentioning them. They are one of many important groups that I would like to have mentioned but didn't in order to keep my post from becoming what I consider too long.
David Nelson, another local Thinking Friend and a retired Evangelical Lutheran Church minister, wrote,
ReplyDelete"Thanks for an excellent reflection. Friendship is great, sharing more of life with a diverse group of friends is wonderful, but my baptismal ordination calls me most of all 'to serve all people, following the example of our Lord Jesus, and to strive for justice and peace in all the earth.'”
Thanks, David, for your comments. I appreciate you doing so much to help create friendship among diverse people, but I also appreciate you recognizing the importance of serving all people and striving for justice and peace in all the earth. That is a great challenge that includes, but goes beyond, personal friendship.
DeleteI was happy to receive the following comments from Thinking Friend Jeanie McGowan, who is currently serving as the (interim) pastor of a Baptist Church in Columbia, Missouri.
ReplyDelete"Thank you, Dr. Seat, for these timely questions. I agree that reparations seem only fair, it would be nearly impossible to do in a fair and just manner--and would likely add to the dissension rather than help close the racial divide.
"The answers you have suggested seem the only way, other than personal actions and conversations, to help to bring about justice for PoC. I still disturbs me greatly how people, many of whom I know and love and respect, cannot understand the BLM movement and are so critical of it. The underlying racial issues that we all have to one degree or another, I think, haunt us and keep us from having even the best attitudes at times. I appreciate your focus on this issue and pray that the seeming momentum growing from the recent horrific events are bringing us to a new understanding and a new way of thinking that is more inclusive and loving."
[This brief response was first posted yesterday afternoon, but it contained an error which is now corrected and posted here again.]
DeleteThanks, Jeanie, for your thoughtful words. I am thankful there are pastors such as you helping people grow in their understanding of what is needed for a more just society.
I appreciate Thinking Friend Charles Kiker in Texas sharing his personal response to today's blog post:
ReplyDelete"Leroy, my genealogy work has turned up some dreadful actions performed by my Southern agricultural antebellum ancestors. I am not responsible FOR the deeds of my ancestors, but I am responsible TO the descendants of those who were mistreated by my ancestors.
"In practicality, the reparations most possible include the ability for a family to have a good living. If, in 1866, a freed male slave had forty acres and a mule AND UNFETTERED ACCESS TO THE MARKET, he could have provided a living for a family, with the family's participation. Forty acres and a mule is not longer possible. But unfettered access to quality education, through high school and beyond, is. Unfettered access to the job market is. Unfettered access to quality health care is.
"Two words are key: unfettered access."
Thanks, Charles, for your comments--and for your important emphasis on unfettered access. Unfortunately, there is much that is lacking in that way; even unfettered access to the voting booth does not seem available currently for all citizens in the U.S.
DeleteCharles wrote back with these comments:
Delete"Unfettered access to the voting booth should have been my #1 entry re: unfettered access. I hope we get enough political change in 2020 to make possible a new voting rights act. Possibly a constitutional amendment forbidding government action with the intent of influencing an election."
Here is part of an email received from a Thinking Friend in California:
ReplyDelete"The Bible is clear that JESUS died for All and everyone is created equal . . . . don't refer to African Americans, Hispanics, Native Americans, Jews, Whites, etc. Let's just say people, he, she, etc."
While it may be true that everyone is created equal and that Jesus died for all equally, it is not true that all are treated equally or justly in society at the present.
DeleteThose of us, like you and me, who enjoy white privilege might want to emphasize that "all lives matter," those who are African Americans, Hispanics, Native Americans, and Jews have suffered discrimination and injustices that you and I haven't. They have been mistreated because of their "otherness," so now there needs to be special actions to compensate for the injustices and indignities they have suffered for not being a part of the privileged white class.
Jesus may have died for all equally, but in his life and teaching, he pointed to the special needs of the man wounded by the side of the road and helped by the "good Samaritan." He told the parable of the good shepherd who left the 99 sheep in the sheepfold to go seek the one lost sheep.
And in his inaugural sermon in Nazareth as recorded in Luke 4, Jesus read from Isaiah 61 and said those words were being fulfilled in him. According to that passage Jesus was anointed "to proclaim good news to the poor"; he was sent "to proclaim freedom for the prisoners and recovery of sight for the blind," and "to set the oppressed free."
In other words, Jesus has a special ministry to those with specific needs; today many of those with special needs are part of racial/ethnic groups--African American, Hispanic, etc.--and it is imperative for those of us who are followers of Jesus to see those special needs and to respond appropriately, seeking peace and justice for all but especially for those who have been treated unjustly the most.
Here is the first part of a much longer email from Thinking Friend Les Hill in Kentucky:
ReplyDelete"Outstanding Louisville, KY, black pastor Lincoln Bingham noted in a newspaper article a few years ago that the separation between black and white congregations was not a racial matter. He identified it as a cultural difference. He illustrated it by writing, 'White church members are leaving their Sunday morning services for lunch just when I’m getting up to preach.'
"Neither white nor black churches should indicate barriers to anyone racially different. Such reveals a lack of Christ likeness in either congregation. If my memory of history seems correct as an aside, interestingly Bonhoeffer found in the short time he visited the US, that biblical truth seemed more clearly presented in Black churches."
Thanks for sharing this, Les.
DeleteI have long said that for most Black people who have been active in a Black church, they would have to give up a lot in order to be a member of a predominantly white church.
And then yesterday evening I received the following pertinent comments from thinking friend Michael Olmsted in Springfield, Missouri"
ReplyDelete"Yes ... we cannot undo the tragedies of the prejudiced past, but we can form a better
society, a society that does not continue to separate, blame, judge, and divide
the human race that God created. Grace is our only hope and the only pattern
on which we can hope to overcome the brokenness we continue to replicate.
"If we wait for the government to heal this tragedy we need to face the truth that
governments are created by people not by a mysterious force that has a will of
its own. To believe is to do ... to live ... to make a difference ... to love in the
example of Jesus."
Well, questions of justice take many forms. In Liberty, Missouri, where Leroy and I live, there is a controversy about whether a Confederate statue in an historic cemetery should be removed or even taken down. Its inscription indicates it honors the Confederate war dead buried in the cemetery, but it was erected 40 years after the war ended, and it stands beside the public sidewalk, facing downhill towards an historic black neighborhood in Liberty. It also references the first Grand Wizard of the KKK. So it seems as much connected to Jim Crow as to the Civil War. You can read more here:
ReplyDeletehttps://www.mycouriertribune.com/news/community-members-seek-removal-of-confederate-statue-from-liberty-cemetery/article_9da0d348-b586-11ea-9fe2-fb65a89865bc.html#/questions
Craig, thanks for mentioning this issue of racial justice here in our city of Liberty. Just a couple of hours before you posted this, June and I were listening to a discussion about this issue on Zoom--and I was happy to see that your wife was one of the participants.
DeleteIt seems quite clear to me that concern for racial justice for American Americans in our city necessitates the removal of the Confederate statue, so I was surprised to hear about the strong opposition to its removal by some people in our community and of the hesitancy of the city council to do that.