Showing posts with label Gospel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gospel. Show all posts

Thursday, February 18, 2021

The Gospel in Dostoyevsky

If you are weary with 2021, go back with me 200 years to 1821. That is the year Fyodor Dostoyevsky was born. That famous Russian novelist died 140 years ago this month, in February 1881. He and his writings are certainly worth thinking about.

Dostoyevsky’s Life

Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoyevsky (often transliterated Dostoevsky) was born in Moscow, the son of a doctor. In 1838 he enrolled in a military engineering school in St. Petersburg, but he was more interested in the humanities than in engineering. After graduating in 1843, he resigned from the army.

After 1845, Dostoyevsky became involved in a political and cultural group of rebels, which was severely targeted by the Russian government. Saved from death by a firing squad in 1849, he spent four years at a prison labor camp and then served five years in the army in Siberia.

Dostoyevsky’s major novels were all written between 1860, after his return to St. Petersburg, and 1880. Three days after his death on Feb. 9, 1881, he was buried in the Tikhvin Cemetery of the historic Alexander Nevsky Monastery. His funeral was attended by tens of thousands of mourners.

Dostoyevsky’s Writings

Dostoevsky's oeuvre consists of 11 novels, three novellas, 17 short stories, and numerous other works. His most acclaimed works are

Notes from Underground (1864)
Crime and Punishment (1866)
The Idiot (1869)
Demons (or The Possessed) (1871-72)
The Brothers Karamazov (1880).

The last of these is arguably the best of the five—and it is said to have been the last book that Leo Tolstoy read before his death in 1910. (Dostoyevsky and Tolstoy knew of each other and of each other’s writings, but apparently they never met in person.)

Dostoyevsky’s Gospel Emphases

The Gospel in Dostoyevsky: Selections from His Works, published by Plough Publishing House most recently in 2014, is a delightful book, made even more delightful with the illustrations, including the cover image, by Fritz Eichenberg. (Here is the link to my 11/30/13 blog post about him.)  

The first selection in the book is “The Legend of the Grand Inquisitor” from The Brothers Karamazov, and certainly that is one of the premier pieces in Dostoyevsky’s writings.

A key assertion here is that “the secret of man’s being is not only to live but to have something to live for.” The Gospel, to Dostoyevsky, unveils that secret.

While the book has four selections from The Idiot and a couple from Crime and Punishment and some from lesser-known writings, those from The Brothers Karamazov are the most powerful, and two lengthy selections are of Elder Zossima (which in other books is sometimes spelled Zosima).

In “From the Life of the Elder Zossima” (Kindle version, pp. 142~182), Dostoyevsky asks through Zossima, “And what is the use of Christ’s words unless we set an example? The people are lost without the Word of God, for their soul is athirst for the Word and for all that is good” (p. 153).

The last selection in the book is “Conversations and Exhortations of Father Zossima” (pp. 210~226). In the brief introduction, the book’s unnamed editors say, “There is no doubt that here we have before us Dostoyevsky’s religious testament.”

In the Foreword (written for an earlier version of this book) Malcolm Muggeridge (1903~90), an Englishman who was an agnostic until he converted to Christianity in his 60s, wrote,

Supposing one were asked to name a book calculated to give an unbeliever today a clear notion of what Christianity is about, could one hope to do much better than The Brothers Karamazov?

Certainly, in it, as well as in his earlier writings, we find the Gospel in Dostoyevsky presented in many thought-provoking and appealing ways. For both Christian believers and non-believers, Dostoyevsky is unquestionably worth reading and/or reading again.

_____

** Of the several sources consulted, I am particularly indebted to David J. Leigh, a Jesuit professor at Seattle University, for his “The Philosophy and Theology of Fyodor Dostoevsky,” published in Vol. 33. Nos. 1-2 of Ultimate Reality and Meaning, a journal published by University of Toronto.

Thursday, April 5, 2018

Winning a Hearing / Losing a Hearing

A couple of weeks before Easter, a friend sent a link to an Easter sermon to me and others on his mailing list. He said it was one of the best Easter sermons he had ever heard. I listened to it, and it was all right—but I was unable to appreciate the sermon fully because of the preacher’s public political stance.
Winning a Hearing
Among “progressive” Christians, there seems to be minimal desire to share the “good news” of the Christian faith with those who are not Christians. That is a real problem, I think, and I am growing increasingly weary of progressive Christians eschewing anything thought to smack of evangelism.
For much of my ministry as a pastor and then as a missionary, one of my ongoing concerns was trying to win a hearing. By that I mean the desire to engage other people in such a way that they would give some active attention to what I wanted to share about the Christian faith, which I thought of as “good news,” literally. 
Winning a hearing was a real challenge in Japan where most people were reared with a worldview that was definitely non-Christian. Some were even anti-Christian, although most didn’t have what could be called a personal religious faith.
The majority of the students I taught in a Japanese university were negative not only toward Christianity but to all religion—and quite often more negative toward Shinto and Buddhism than toward Christianity.
My constant challenge was to win a hearing, to spark people’s interest and desire to learn more about Jesus Christ and his life and teachings. Such matters were, I thought, for their personal benefit and for the benefit of the society/world in which they lived.
Losing a Hearing
Back in the late 1960s and early ’70s, more than winning a hearing for the Gospel, some of my missionary colleagues in Japan lost a hearing for the “good news” of Jesus because of their support for the Vietnam War.
There were student protests against that war in Japan just as there were in the States, and missionaries who were vocal in their support of the U.S. war efforts in Vietnam mostly lost any possibility of sharing about Jesus to the many Japanese students who strongly opposed the war. Their political position destroyed their opportunity for Christian witness.
As a pacifist, it was not hard for me to agree with the students in opposing the war in Indochina. My anti-war stance was not a ruse to curry favor among the students but a position I took because of my belief in Jesus.
That position, happily, made it possible for me to win a hearing from many of the students I taught and talked with on campus.
The Case of the Preacher
The preacher of the Resurrection sermon mentioned in the beginning was one of the earliest widely-known Christian pastors publicly to endorse Donald Trump for President. 
I first thought that was probably because of his choosing the “lesser of two evils.” As a strong conservative Christian, he was/is adamantly opposed to abortion and LGBT rights, so he doubtlessly thought he had to oppose Hillary.
But this pastor has continued to be one of DJT’s most vocal supporters in spite of all the charges of political, financial, and moral charges of impropriety. Since his continuing support has given him access to the White House, perhaps an underlying motive is a desire for power and prestige.
So, sadly, while the noted pastor’s sermon on the Resurrection may have been a good one, it is not likely to be heard with appreciation by those who strongly disagree with his blatant political stance.