The Basis of the DofD
In June 1452, Nicholas V, the Catholic Pope (reigned 1447~55), issued a papal bull (public decree) under the title Dum Diversas. It primarily authorized King Afonso V of Portugal to conquer and subjugate Muslims and “pagans.”
Specifically,
the Pope granted the Portuguese king permission
to invade, search out, capture, vanquish, and subdue all Saracens [Arab Muslims] and pagans whatsoever, and other enemies of Christ wheresoever placed, . . . and to reduce their persons to perpetual slavery . . . .
As
it was issued less than a year before the Fall of Constantinople in
1453, the bull may have been intended to begin another crusade against
the Ottoman Empire. (The crusade did not develop, however, and the capital
of the Roman Empire established in 330 fell to the Turks and the Empire ended.)
The
papal bull, however, was used by Portugal to begin taking slaves from Africa
and then for subjugating indigenous people in the “new world.”
The DofD and Manifest
Destiny
Some who have recently written about the Doctrine of
Discovery say that it is so deplorable because of its use to subjugate and
oppress Native Americans in what is now the USA.
The mistreatment of Natives by the Spanish in what
is now Texas and the southwest part of the U.S. and the same sort of
mistreatment by the French in Florida and Louisiana was, no doubt, partly
because of the Doctrine of Discovery.
But those parts of the U.S. were then incorporated
in various ways into the U.S. by a government almost completely controlled by WASPS
who were opponents of Catholicism.
The Puritans were Christians in England who sought
to purify the Church of England from Catholic practices, and after coming to “New
England,” they sought to do in the “new world” what they couldn’t do in
England.
The Puritan attitude toward the Native people,
however, was very similar to that expressed in the Doctrine of Discovery, and
from 1630 on, the spirit of triumphal conquest found in the DofD was later justified
by the concept of Manifest Destiny.
It was under the overarching idea of Manifest
Destiny that the Natives of North America were abused and exploited in much the
same way that the indigenous peoples of Central and South America had been subjugated
by conquistadors from Catholic countries based on the DofD .
The intention of both the Doctrine of Discovery and
of Manifest Destiny was to subject Indigenous peoples to the rule of white
European and/or Anglo-Saxon “Christians.”
What Can We Do Now?
Perhaps the first task is to learn about how terribly
destructive the implementation of the Doctrine of Discovery and of Manifest
Destiny was for Native Americans.
There are Christians who have in recent years been
writing about the evils of the DofD. Mennonite Church USA, for example, has since 2014 been working on resources for “dismantling” the DofD. (Check out their DofD website here.)
In 2016 the Christian Reformed Church (CRC) responded
to a 68-page report on the DofD by repudiating
the Doctrine, labeling it as heresy and lamenting the pain it has caused.
![]() |
Mark Charles |
The authors conclude that
“our only path to healing is through lament and learning how to accept some
very unsettling truths” (p. 206).
But in addition to learning
and lamenting, surely there is a need for confessing, repenting, apologizing, and
determining to engage with others in seeking to dismantle the deplorable Doctrine
of Discovery.
What will you do?
* * * * *
Addendum
In the Department of Defense Appropriations Act of
2010, of all things, there is an apology to the Native Americans in the U.S. Section 8113 of that Act, which was passed
into law by Congress in Dec. 2009, states
that the United States, acting through Congress: (1) recognizes that there have been years of official depredations, ill-conceived policies, and the breaking of covenants by the federal government regarding Indian tribes; (2) apologizes on behalf of the people of the United States to all Native Peoples for the many instances of violence, maltreatment, and neglect inflicted upon them by U.S. citizens; (3) urges the President to acknowledge such wrongs; and (4) commends state governments that have begun reconciliation efforts and encourages all state governments to work toward reconciling their relationships with Indian tribes within their boundaries.
Unfortunately, that apology received hardly any press coverage
and was largely overlooked by the President. (Charles & Rah discuss this matter on pages 190~4 of Unsettling
Truths.)