Showing posts with label Jackson (Andrew). Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jackson (Andrew). Show all posts

Tuesday, September 30, 2025

Considering, Sadly, the Treaty of Dancing Rabbit Creek

Most of you are familiar with the phrase “the Trail of Tears.” Perhaps many of you, though, don’t remember hearing anything about the Treaty of Dancing Rabbit Creek. Only recently did I learn that that was the name of the first removal treaty that initiated the trail of tears for Native Americans. 

Andrew Jackson instigated the removal of Indians from the eastern U.S. states. One of the major events of the War of 1812 was the Battle of New Orleans in 1814, led by General Andrew (“Old Hickory”) Jackson. He was then regarded as a war hero, and 14 years later, he was elected the seventh POTUS.

As I noted in my June 2012 blog post about the War of 1812 (see here), the greatest losers in that war were the Native Americans. Jackson fought against the “Indians” then, and subsequently, in his first State of the Union address (in December 1829), he asked Congress to pass Indian removal legislation.

In April 1830, the Senate passed the Indian Removal Act, and then on May 26, the House of Representatives passed the Act by a vote of 101 to 97. Four days later, it was signed into law by President Jackson. Then the Treaty of Dancing Rabbit Creek was enacted 195 years ago, on September 27, 1830.

Dancing Rabbit Creek was the name of a small geographical area in what is now Noxubee County, Mississippi. The Choctaw Nation occupied more than 2/3 of what became the state of Mississippi. The 1830 treaty was with those living in the northern part of the Choctaw’s land. Their removal began in 1831.

The 1831~33 journey westward was marked by hunger, exposure, disease, and death. During that terrible time, the Arkansas Gazette reported that a Choctaw chief lamented that his people’s removal from Mississippi resulted in a "trail of tears and death."*1

The Treaty of Dancing Rabbit Creek continued genocidal actions of the U.S. against Native Americans. Even though most USAmericans have not usually considered the nation’s treatment of Indians as genocide, that seems to be an apt description of what has gone on for centuries.

The 1948 UN Genocide Convention defines genocide as acts “committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group.”

But according to Claude (whom I have repeatedly called my AI buddy), many genocide scholars now argue that the cumulative effect of European colonization, including disease, warfare, and deliberate policies, constitutes genocide even if individual components were initially unintentional.

For the Native Americans who lived in the northeastern part of what became the USA, a large percentage of the Native Americans in “New England” had already died before 1621 from diseases (mostly smallpox) brought by the Europeans who had come in the previous decade.*2

So, whether intentional or not, European colonists caused the genocide of Native Americans.

Much more needs to be done to correct past genocidal activities. Fortunately, it is generally said that the “Indian Wars” ended in 1890. But mistreatment of Native Americans continued long after that.

I was delighted that Deb Haaland became the first Indian Cabinet secretary in U.S. history in March 2021. But her maternal grandparents suffered under government regulations.*3   

Currently, up to 20% of Native Americans live on reservations. That represents several hundred thousand people out of a total Native American population of around 6-9 million. Many of those living on reservations suffer from poverty, unemployment, alcoholism, and relatively low life expectancy.

Native Americans have the highest poverty rate of any major racial group, and unemployment rates have averaged 50% for decades on many reservations. Alcoholism death rates among young Native Americans is over ten times the national average of the general population.

Further, Indian communities experience higher rates of suicide compared to all other racial and ethnic groups, and Native Americans have the lowest life expectancy among racial and ethnic groups in the U.S.

These negative considerations are all largely rooted in the shameful Treaty of Dancing Rabbit Creek. And they are all issues that need to be addressed more fully by the federal government, seeking liberty and justice for all U.S. citizens.

_____

*1 It should be noted that the term “the trail of tears” is most often associated with the removal of the Cherokee Nation from northern Georgia and bordering areas beginning in 1838.

*2 This was mentioned in my Thanksgiving blog post made in November 2009: The View from This Seat: What About the First Thanksgiving Day?

*3 A January 2021 blog post was titled, “A Notable Nomination: Haaland for Secretary of the Interior.” That was certainly notable, for she became the first Native American to serve in a President’s Cabinet. Considerably after 1890, her maternal grandparents were, in Haaland’s words, “stolen from their families when they were only 8 years old and were forced to live away from their parents, culture and communities until they were 13.” They were forced to go to a federal Indian boarding school, and such schools continued until the 1960s.

Sunday, July 5, 2020

Honoring/Dis-honoring Andrew Jackson

The Apostle Andrew was always a favorite of mine. But I have not been fond (to say the least) of the two U.S. Presidents named Andrew. This blog post is about the first of those two, Andrew Jackson, who was the seventh POTUS and in office from 1829 to 1837. 
Statue of Andrew Jackson in front of the Jackson County Courthouse in Kansas City, Mo.
The statue was sculpted by Charles Keck and placed here in 1934.
Honoring Andrew Jackson
Before becoming President, Jackson was a noted military man. His victory in 1815 against the British at the Battle of New Orleans made him a national hero. Jackson then led U.S. forces in the First Seminole War, which led to the annexation of Florida from Spain in 1819.
On December 15, 1826, almost two years before Jackson was elected POTUS, a new county in the rather new state of Missouri was established and named after General Jackson. It is now home to three of the six largest cities in Missouri: Kansas City, Independence, and Lee’s Summit.
Jackson County, Mo., is one of 24 counties (including Jackson Parish, La.) in the U.S. named after Jackson. There are also numerous cities, towns, and villages named Jacksonville or Jackson. Jacksonville, Florida, was so named in 1822 in commemoration of Jackson who was the first military governor of Florida Territory.
If you are a white American, and especially one who believes in white supremacy as DJT seemingly does, honoring Jackson probably seems good and reasonable to you.
DJT tweeted on June 30, “This [fight for preserving the statues] is a battle to save the Heritage, History, and Greatness of our Country!” And as you probably know, he has a portrait of Jackson on the wall near his desk in the Oval Office.
There is much heritage, history, and greatness linked to Jackson, no doubt—as well as to Robert E. Lee.
But how many Black Americans have you heard wanting to save the heritage, history, and greatness of the country by honoring/protecting the statues/monuments of Lee?
And how many Native Americans have you heard wanting to save the heritage, history, and greatness of the country by honoring/protecting the statues/monuments of Jackson?
Things look different when seen through eyes other than those of people who have always enjoyed the many, often unrecognized, benefits of white privilege.
Dis-honoring Andrew Jackson
Twice recently I have written in opposition to the “lynching” of statues or monuments, that is, toppling or destroying them by violent, illegal means. But I am a strong advocate of removing such statues or monuments by legislative bodies.
The word dishonor means “bring shame or disgrace on,” and that is not particularly what I am advocating. As someone said to me recently, if we were living at the same time and in the same region (as Jackson, or whomever we see as a problem in the past), we likely would have done, or supported, the same thing we find objectionable today. Quite probably so.
What I am advocating is that we dis-honor such people, that is, remove the statues or monuments of those whom we no longer wish to honor.
Clearly, having a statue or monument of someone standing in a public place, or having a city or county named after a person of the past, honors that person.
Jackson County, Mo., obviously took its name in 1826 because of the desire of the decision-makers who wished to honor Andrew Jackson as a military hero. I seriously doubt that there would have been any single person of the Seminole Nation who would have agreed with that honoring.
And after Jackson’s Indian Removal Act of 1830, I can’t imagine there were any Native Americans who thought Jackson deserved the honor bestowed on him.
There are Native Americans who live in Jackson County right now. In honor of both their citizenship and ethnicity, I urge Jackson County officials to remove Jackson’s recently defaced statue (which is now under a tarp, as you see below) from its current location and to begin the process of changing the name of the county.