Over
the last four months, I have posted four foundational articles related to my
book The Limits of Liberalism (2010), which I am updating and slightly
revising this year. This post is based on Chapter Five, the first specific
issue discussed with an entire chapter—and the only one dealing with the same issue
as my book on fundamentalism.
Positive
Aspects in Liberal Views
Before
elucidating some problem areas in liberal views of the Bible, several positions
must first be noted as being commendable.
First,
the rejection of biblical inerrancy is an important emphasis of liberalism.
In
his 2003 book The Heart of Christianity, Marcus Borg strikingly states
that in the last half-century “more Christians have left the church because of
the Bible than for any other single reason” (p. 43)—and that is largely because
of the conservative evangelical emphasis on inerrancy. Thus, the liberals’
rejection of that is praiseworthy.
Also,
as I write in Chapter Five, “As opposed to fundamentalism’s approach to the
Bible, in the liberal paradigm there is freedom to revise interpretations and
to reject previous views which are obviously no longer valid.” That, too, is
commendable.
So,
there are clearly some positive aspects in liberal views of the Bible. However,
. . .
Negative
Aspects in Liberal Views
The
starting point of liberalism is one of the main problems, for it begins with
reason, not God’s revelation as recorded in the Bible.
Traditional
“orthodox” (Protestant) theologians thought we should start with the Bible and
form our Christian beliefs and base our actions on it. But liberals tend to
think that we should start with reason and accept only what we can rationally
understand and accept of the Bible.
That
problem was highlighted by Martin Luther in his disputation with the scholar
Erasmus. Luther reportedly said, “The difference between you and me, Erasmus,
is that you sit above Scripture and judge it, while I sit under Scripture and
let it judge me!”
Further,
one does not have to be a conservative evangelical to see that there are
potential problems with the liberals’ “softness” in speaking clearly about the
unique inspiration of the Bible or the authority of the Bible, which were
strong traditional Christian emphases long before the rise of fundamentalism.
Questions
about Liberal Views
In
Chapter Five, I discuss five questions. The first two are, “human or divine?”
and “factual or metaphorical?” In contrast to most conservatives’ emphasis on
the Bible as divine and mostly factual, most liberals tend to see the Bible primarily
as a human book and mostly metaphorical.
Both
questions are probably answered best with a both/and position rather than an either/or
one. The latter is easier to explain, but the truth is much more likely to be
found in the both/and explanation.
The
final question of the chapter is this: should Christians speak of the “Holy
Bible” or of multiple “sacred scriptures”?
There
is a proclivity in liberal theology toward the latter, which means relativizing
the Bible. Thus, rather than holding to the Christian Bible as unique, as implied
by the words “Holy Bible,” the sacred writings of other faith traditions are
seen as more or less of equal value or validity.
In
contrast to the contentious past in which Christians tended to vilify other
religions and to denigrate their scriptures, liberals are prone to accept the
scriptures of all major religions as being more or less of equal value.
Certainly,
that irenic attitude of the liberals in this regard is preferable to the
belligerent attitudes and actions of many Christians of the past. But it is not
necessary to go from one extreme to the other.
Asserting
one’s belief in and acceptance of the “Holy Bible” does not keep us from
affirming the right of the adherents of other religions to believe in and
accept the sacredness of their scriptures.
But
affirmation of religious freedom does not mean relativism. It is simply a
matter of respect for others with different traditions. Or, we might say, it is
a matter of loving others as we are commanded to do by the Holy Bible.
*****
“The
Bible Is Like a Rorschach Test” was the title of my 9/20/17 blog post, and it
has received more than 350 pageviews; if you would like to read it (again), click here.
