Showing posts with label gender-neutral language. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gender-neutral language. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 15, 2022

In Grateful Memory of a Theologian Named Rosemary

Not many Christian theologians have been named Rosemary. In fact, not many Christian theologians before this century were women. But Rosemary Radford Ruether was a noted theologian and a leader of feminist liberation theology. She was born on November 2, 1936, and died in May of this year. 

Claremont School of Theology photo

Rosemary Radford was born in Minnesota, the daughter of an Episcopalian father and a Roman Catholic mother. When she was 12, her father died and she moved with her mother to California where she attended Catholic schools.

Rosemary graduated from prestigious Scripps College, a private women’s school in southern California, and then earned M.A. and Ph.D. degrees at Claremont School of Theology, a United Methodist institution.

While still a student at Scripps, she married Herman Ruether in 1957, and eight years later they had three children—and she had her Ph.D. and was authoring a book. During her lifetime, she wrote 36 books and more than 600 scholarly articles and also gave a formidable number of public lectures.

Ruether’s teaching career was spent entirely in Protestant schools: Howard University, Pacific School of Religion, and Garrett-Evangelical Theological Seminary where she taught the longest. But she was a self-identified Catholic for her whole life.

Rosemary Radford Ruether is best known as a pioneer feminist theologian and an advocate of ecofeminist theology. Her major books are Sexism and God-Talk: Toward a Feminist Theology (1983) and Gaia and God: An Ecofeminist Theology of Earth Healing (1992).

The subtitle of the second chapter of Ruether’s 1983 book is “Male and Female Images of the Divine,” and she concludes with a subsection titled “Toward a Feminist Understanding of God/ess.”

There is strong opposition to any reference to a Goddess in Christianity, since that term is always feminine, but little opposition to the use of Christianity’s use of God, which has overwhelmingly been seen as male, at least until recently. Ruether’s term helped correct that theological error.*

To overcome the powerful and long tradition of envisioning God as male, Ruether uses the Goddess image to emphasize that God is equally female, which is the same as saying that God transcends gender bifurcation.

With regard to her ecofeminism, Ruether was the first to connect publicly the domination of the earth with the oppression of women. In her 1992 book, she sought to “demonstrate the interconnectedness of domination and deceit, the social systems of power over women . . .” (p. 8).

Ruether is also known as a critic of such traditional Roman Catholic stances as birth control, the ordination of women, papal infallibility, and the rejection of liberation theology. In 2008 she published a slim book under the title Catholic Does Not Equal the Vatican: A Vision for Progressive Catholicism.

In that book’s Introduction, she calls for a church that is multicultural, that acknowledges its fallibility, lives by grace, is liberated from sexism, is democratic, and is committed to the poor and the oppressed (see pp. 4~11).

Rosemary Ruether was a liberation theologian and modern prophet. In my university lecture on liberation theology (both in Japan and at Rockhurst U. here in Kansas City), I introduced Gustavo Gutiérrez, James Cone, and Ruether.

Just as Gutiérrez wrote about liberating the poor in South America from economic exploitation and Cone wrote about liberating African Americans from racism, Ruether wrote about liberating women from male domination. All three advocated that liberation on the basis of their Christian faith.

In Four Modern Prophets (1986), author William Ramsay summarizes the work of four modern theologians who epitomized the struggle for freedom and justice. Those four are Walter Rauschenbusch, Martin Luther King, Jr, Gustavo Gutiérrez, and Ruether.**

Ramsay contends that much of Ruether’s theology was an effort to apply the teaching of Jesus “to contemporary concerns, not only sexism but also racism and economic oppression” (p. 87).

When I heard of Ruether’s death back in May, I was saddened that the voice of this prodigious theologian and prophet had been silenced, but I am grateful that she continues to speak through her numerous books and articles.

_____

* In February 2015, I made a blog post titled “Using Gender-Neutral Language for God.” (Inexplicably, there have been over 3,000 pageviews of that post.)

** I have previously posted blog articles about the first three of these (see especially here, here, and here). I am happy now to be making this post about Ruether.

Monday, February 9, 2015

Using Gender-Neutral Language for God

This month I am preaching each Sunday at the Rosedale Congregational United Church of Christ. The title of my sermon yesterday was “Good News of the Kingdom,” from Mark 1:15.
Updated terminology. In the first part of the sermon I had to take time to talk about terminology. The UCC does not usually refer to God with gender-specific words: as a rule, they do not call God “Father” or use masculine nouns in referring to God. I don’t have any trouble with that, for I adopted that same general approach years ago.
In addition, the UCC doesn’t like to talk about the Kingdom of God—for that implies there is a king, and we all know that kings are male. So the preferred term is “realm of God.” A section in “The New Century Hymnal,” the UCC hymn book published in 1995, is titled “Realm of God.”
While I see the point in that new wording and appreciate the consistency of it, I have had some trouble making that shift in terminology. Maybe “kingdom” doesn’t always mean there is a male monarch—it certainly doesn’t for the United Kingdom where Queen Elizabeth has been the monarch for more than 60 years.
Updated hymn. For the service yesterday, I chose the closing hymn from the “Peace and Justice” section. The title is “Lead On Eternal Sovereign,” and the words are attributed to Ernest Shurtleff. But the hymn that he wrote to be sung at the graduation service of Andover Seminary in 1888 began, “Lead on, O King eternal.”
Even though Shurtleff’s name appears at the bottom of the page, there are few words that are the same as those he wrote. Not only is gender specific language not used, military images have also been changed—for which I am grateful. The result is a fine hymn, but it is not really the same as what the author wrote.
Here are the words of the third verse to the updated hymn:
Lead on eternal Sovereign, till sin’s fierce war shall cease
    and all your saints together will sing a hymn of peace;
Then all in your dominion will live with hearts set free,
    to love and serve each other for all eternity.

Updated Lord’s Prayer. There are three versions of the Lord’s Prayer in the UCC hymnal. I was surprised to see that all three begin, “Our Father,” and all three use the word “kingdom.” So to be consistent, I thought there ought to be an alternative version without gender-specific language.
My Google search failed to find anything suitable, so I decided to write a paraphrased version myself. Here is what I came up with:
Creator God, Redeemer and Sustainer of all that is,
May your Reality be honored by us and by all creation.
May your will be done on earth as it is in your Eternal Realm.
Give us the food we need for our sustenance today.
Forgive our sins as we forgive those who sin against us.
Save us from times of trial and deliver us from evil.
For the glory and power of the Eternal Realm is yours forever.
Amen.
So, what do you think? Is it necessary to use gender-neutral language for God and for “his kingdom” as well as for the Lord’s Prayer? And if that is desirable for the latter, is the version I came up with satisfactory, or are there places that need to be changed and improved?