Friday, March 20, 2026

Three “Lunatics” Supporting the Lunatic-in-Chief

“Is Trump a Lunatic?” is the title of my previous blog post. Bruce Maples, founder of the “Forward Kentucky” website, recently referred to Trump as “the Lunatic-in-Chief.”* This post highlights the “lunacy” (used in the metaphorical sense) of three men closely associated with the POTUS. 

(Pete Hegseth as depicted by Rachel Bitecofer)

Trump delivered an “address to the nation” on December 17. That same day, Maples portrayed the speech as an unhinged, lie-filled, 20‑minute tirade marked by bragging, blame‑shifting toward Biden and the Democrats, and disjointed nonsense.

Andy Curtis is an applied linguist and former president of the TESOL International Association. Back in 2018, he labeled Trump the ‘Lunatic‑in‑Chief.’ Maples cast the December 17 address as yet another performance that fully merited that description. In a 2019 post, Curtis also called Trump the “most famous liar in the world today.”

There are, not surprisingly, many loyalists who support Trump’s prevarication, misleading statements, and gaslighting. This post is a brief look at three “lunatics” who are his main supporters.

Steve Bannon (his given name is Stephen, but he is called Steve in the media and public life), has been closely associated with Trump since 2016.

Bannon (b. 1953) was a close ally of Andrew Breitbart, founder of Breitbart News. After Breitbart’s death in 2012, Bannon became its executive chairman and shaped in into a nationalist, pro‑Trump website. Consequently, Breitbart News came to be known as “the platform for the alt‑right” and was widely seen as “Trump Central” during the 2016 campaign.

After breaking with Trump in early 2018, Bannon started his “War Room” podcasts early in 2019, releasing new episodes five or six times a week. His podcast on March 19, 2026, was labeled as #5227. Bannon’s War Room is often depicted as “ultra-conservative” or “hyper-partisan right,” and it is widely seen as “a hub for extreme MAGA rhetoric.”

Currently, Bannon is clearly one of the “lunatics” actively supporting the Lunatic-in-Chief.

Stephen Miller (although he has the same given name as Bannon, he goes by the full name, never by Steve) has also long been a Trump supporter. Miller (b. 1985) is said to have felt an intense personal connection upon Trump’s June 2015 candidacy announcement, viewing ‘it as aligning perfectly with his longstanding anti-immigration views. At Bannon’s and Jared Kushner’s urging, in 2016 Miller joined Trump’s campaign full-time as a senior policy advisor, writing Trump’s early speeches and embedding nationalist rhetoric like “radical Islam.” His loyalty proved unwavering through Trump’s first term and his 2024 campaign.

Since January 2025, Miller has served as the White House Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy in President Trump’s administration. That position gives him broad oversight of immigration enforcement, homeland security, and domestic policy execution, including mass deportations and executive orders.

Without question, Miller is one of the three main “lunatics” currently supporting the President.

Pete Hegseth (although his given name is Peter, he universally goes by Pete) assumed his first paid federal government role in Trump’s second term, when he nominated Hegseth for secretary of defense in November 2024. The Senate confirmed him after a tie-breaking vote by VP Vance, and he was sworn in on January 25, 2025.

Hegseth (b. 1980) is clearly one of the most important and most dangerous men in the U.S. today. As the Secretary of Defense/War, he is the official most responsible for launching/conducting the current “war” against Iran. As the oft-quoted anonymous saying puts it, “The most dangerous people are those who commit violence believing they are doing God’s will."

As is widely known, Hegseth is a conservative evangelical Christian who embraces a literal interpretation of what the Book of Revelation says about Armageddon and the Rapture. His current involvement in the war on Iran seems clearly to be based on his fundamentalistic Christian beliefs.**

Hegseth has said he will practice “no quarter” in Iran, which means he will refuse to spare enemy lives or take prisoners but will execute all who surrender or are captured. Supposedly, that is legitimate since, in his eyes, all Muslims are going to “fry when they die” (my words, not his) anyway.

Robert Reich’s March 16 Substack post was titled Trump’s Stupidest Cabinet Member, and he said Hegseth, this third of Trump’s “lunatic” enablers, is “a clear winner.”

With the rampant presence and power of these three “lunatics,” I repeat what I said at the end of my previous post: Heaven help us!

_____

  * Following his unsuccessful run for Louisville Metro Council in 2014 as a Democrat and frustrated by weak progressive voices in those elections, Maples founded Forward Kentucky in 2015.

** For those not familiar with the common conservative evangelical view of the end times, see the following articles: “Evangelicalism’s Twin Engines of Destruction: The Theological Innovation Sanctifying Trump’s War in Iran,” “Armageddon is not a strategy for peace in Iran,” and “The Pentagon’s Armageddon Problem,” Rachel Bitecofer’s March 12th Substack post. (The image at the top of this post was taken from the latter.)

7 comments:

  1. Here is a piece about Hegseth posted yesterday by Doug Pagitt, founder of Vote Common Good:
    https://www.votecommongood.com/pete-hegseth-wants-your-kids-to-pray-for-his-war/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It goes without saying that I posted the link above because I recommend that you read Doug's post, if you have the time and interest to do so.

      Delete
  2. The only comments regarding today's blog post I have received so far are from Thinking Friend Eric Dollard in Chicago:

    "Thanks, Leroy, for your comments about Bannon, Miller, and Hegseth. I fully agree with your assessments.

    "I read the article by Robert Reich about Hegseth, who faces serious competition for the dubious title of “dumbest Cabinet member.” Before she was fired, I considered Kristi Noam to be the dumbest Cabinet member; unfortunately, it appears that she may be replaced by someone as dumb or even dumber.

    "As with all wars, Operation Epic Disaster is dismaying. More people will be killed and more infrastructures, on which people depend, will be destroyed. This war with Iran is insane, and it will undoubtedly get worse before it ends."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for your comments, Eric. I agree that Kristi Noem was one of the dumbest Cabinet members. But Reich was talking about the stupidest person in Trump's Cabinet, and according to Perplexity AI, being stupid is worse than being dumb. Here's what AI said:

      "'Dumb' and 'stupid' are often used interchangeably to insult someone's intelligence, but subtle distinctions exist in connotation and usage. 'Dumb' typically implies a lack of knowledge, education, or quick thinking due to ignorance or inexperience—something fixable through learning. 'Stupid,' by contrast, suggests a deeper, more willful or inherent flaw, like knowing better but acting foolishly anyway, or a total absence of common sense. This difference appears in sayings like 'you can't fix stupid,' highlighting its perceived permanence."

      Delete
  3. Here are brief comments from a Thinking Friend in southwest Missouri:

    "Thanks, Leroy, for putting out the unvarnished truth in a time when truth-telling is risky."

    ReplyDelete
  4. And then, a Thinking Friend who lives here in Liberty wrote, "Thanks, Leroy, for your comments on the "three lunatics." Right on. -- (Note: Kennedy may be as nuts as Hegseth.)

    So then I had to ask Perplexity again how "nuts" relates to "dumb" and "stupid." Here was the answer I received:

    Nuts is different "from both 'dumb' (ignorance or slow thinking) and 'stupid' (willful foolishness)," since that term 'focuses on mental instability or eccentricity over IQ'."

    I guess the term I would pin on Kennedy would be "dumb," more than "stupid" or "nuts."

    ReplyDelete
  5. As a roundup of stupid people around Trump, I think you have a good sample. In their incompetence they are all very dangerous. However, behind them are some dangerously evil people, many of whom are quite intelligent. Think about that row of billionaires from Silicon Valley that lined up behind Trump at his 2025 inauguration. With their obsession with going to Mars, building AI, and disdain for democracy, they are a powerful and dangerous group. They are also merging with the military industrial complex that has been distorting America and vexing the world for decades. Whether it is Elon Musk and his DOGE disaster, or Peter Theil (of Palantir and Paypal fame) and his puppet Vice President Vance, they did not build their empires by being stupid, although they did not do it by being good, either. Trump did not get to the power is wields without the help of many prepositioned henchmen on the Supreme Court and other judgeships, Congress, Senate, media, and Wall Street. Ever since the 1971 Powell memo got the wealthy energized, there has been an unrelenting class war by the rich against everyone else. Now much of this was aimed abroad at helpless countries we have plundered, but increasingly the plunder has come home, until now we have it fully manifest in Trump 2.0. For a look at Louis Powell, read The Nation here: https://www.thenation.com/article/society/powell-memo-project-2025-plutocracy/

    Now Pete Hegseth is the most interesting one of the disasters listed above, because his disastrous leadership in his renamed Department of War may well cause such a cataclysmic military failure in Iran that he may well pull down the whole Trump administration with him. Of course, he could also easily get tens of millions of people killed in the process. Most generals have a tendency to fight the last war, while Pete thinks he is fighting Armageddon. What will the world look like if soon there is no mideast oil or natural gas, no Israel, no gulf states, no Iran? Some wise thinkers think we may be in the opening stages of World War III. Who knew it could sneak in so casually? With both Republican and Democratic party leaderships (and funders) supporting genocide in Gaza and beyond, are we really ready for Judgment Day? Sack cloth and ashes might be a better look. Even MAGA voters are beginning to back away. For instance, Netanyahu just got in trouble with MAGA for comparing Jesus Christ to Ghenghis Kahn to explain how sometimes you must be a mighty warrior. He probably would have been better off if he had skipped Will Durant and used Philip Jenkins as his reference point. Per Jenkins in his The Lost History of Christianity, the army of Ghenghis was a mixed bag of Buddhists and Christians. That might have gone down better as a justification for the Onward Christian Soldiers mentality. The irony is that Netanyahu contrasted the peace of Jesus with the war of Ghenghis, to point out his opinion that sometimes you just need to be a warrior. Apparently Warrior Jesus is second to none in use of the mighty sword in the MAGA world. You can read about Jesus and Ghenghis here: https://www.ms.now/opinion/netanyahu-jesus-genghis-khan

    ReplyDelete