The news media and the internet have been awash with news and opinions about the tragic murder of Charlie Kirk last week. I was amazed that his assassination garnered such wide coverage. Earlier this year, he talked about the current “assassination culture,” a topic worth analyzing.
There
should be grief first and criticism later. On the day of
Kirk’s killing, some spoke negatively of him. But on that afternoon
of September 10, I posted words of Doug Pagitt on my Facebook page.*
Pagitt
wrote, "I am outraged by the horrific assassination of Charlie Kirk, and
my heartfelt prayers are with him and his family. Political violence has no
place in America.”
He
went on to say, "Charlie Kirk and I disagreed on nearly everything when it
came to politics, but disagreement belongs in the realm of ideas, debate, and
voting, not in acts of harm.”
One
of my good friends posted negative things about Kirk on Facebook not long after
he was murdered, and I “scolded” him for doing that so soon after his
assassination. As I said to my friend, I fully agreed with what Pagitt wrote
that day.
I
also disapproved of others on the political left who were quick to say harsh
things about Kirk, even though they were true. I am surprised, though, that
according to Copilot, Pagitt has not publicly mentioned Kirk since 9/10.
Perhaps
he noted how many who spoke out against what Kirk had said through the years,
and especially recently, were chastised and even fired from public positions
for doing so.
Ironically, Kirk was a staunch advocate of free speech, but many who used
that freedom to say negative things about him were punished for what they
said/wrote—and apparently some even for publicizing what Kirk himself had said.
“Both
sides” need to be analyzed accurately. Despite Kirk accusing the left of
fostering an assassination culture, it seems clear that in recent decades, far
more violent acts have been committed by right-wing advocates than by those on
the left. I asked Copilot about this, and here is its response:
While figures like Charlie Kirk and Donald Trump have pointed fingers at the political left for fostering what they call “assassination culture,” there’s a substantial body of evidence showing that far-right rhetoric and behavior have significantly contributed to the escalation of political violence in the U.S.”
And
here is what Claude, my AI “buddy” reports: “The data shows
that while Charlie Kirk uses the term 'assassination culture' to
criticize the left, the statistical evidence suggests that far-right extremists
have been responsible for significantly more political violence and deaths
since 2000.”
Claude
goes on to say, “The disparity is quite stark - far-right extremists have
committed over 6 times more deaths (520+ vs 78) and nearly 5.5 times more
incidents (227 vs 42) than far-left extremists since 1990, with this trend
continuing into recent years.”**
Take
a look once again at the graph after the introductory paragraph at the top.
Beware
of being misled by the Vice President or intimidated by the right-wing
media. On Monday, filling in for Kirk on his regular program, VP Vance spoke
about “festering violence on the far left.” He also reportedly said on Fox
News that the accused assassin was “radicalized by the far left, by the social
networks of the far left, by the ideas of the far left.”
Two
days after her husband’s assassination, Erika Kirk said, “The evildoers
responsible for my husband's assassination have no idea what they have done.
They killed Charlie ….”
Gary
Bauer, a well-known conservative evangelical, wrote on Thursday, Erika’s “use
of the words ‘evildoers’ (plural) and ‘they’ was intentional. She was referring
to the radical leftists who hated her husband, who smeared her husband, and who
did everything they could to dehumanize him.”
But
at this point, from what we know about Tyler Robinson, the alleged assassin of Kirk,
he is not affiliated with
any political party, and there is no evidence linking him to any organized
leftist group or movement.
So, in analyzing the assassination culture that Kirk saw as defining the left, it seems
much more likely to be a characteristic of the right, which was emphasized so
much by Kirk and his organization, Turning Point USA.
_____
*
Doug Pagitt (b. 1966) launched
Vote Common Good with a 31-city bus tour that began on October 2, 2018. On Oct.
14, I drove over to Overland Park, Kansas, to hear him speak and to chat with
him briefly. Six days later, I posted a blog article about him and Vote Common
Good (see here).
** In the next paragraph, Claude went on to say, “This data comes from multiple credible sources, including the National Institute of Justice, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), the Anti-Defamation League, and academic research published in peer-reviewed journals.”
After receiving the above information, I saw this article with similar content on Time magazine’s website: “Trump Called for a Crackdown on the ‘Radical Left.’ But Right-Wing Extremists Are Responsible for More Political Violence.” The graph included in the article is what I posted above.
There will surely be more responses later, but the first I received this morning (not long after 6:00) was in an email from local Thinking Friend David Nelson:
ReplyDelete"You are right that two realities can happen at once. We, of course, grief the assignation of any human being. All people of empathy are joining those who are saddened by such evil.
"And at the same time we are respecting the difference that many of us have with the victim. His political opinions betrayed our countries core values. His racism, homophobia, anti-human attitude about the diversity of the beautiful human family are all deplorable.
"May we continue to use non-violent means of expressing our differences. That would honor Charlie in his tragic and unnecessary death."
This morning, Thinking Friend Bob Hanson of Wisconsin, shared the following comments of his friend and colleague Rev Ken Wheeler, a retired ELCA pastor of African decent.
ReplyDelete"We remember the things he said about Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.: 'MLK was awful. He’s not a good person.' We remember his calculation on gun violence: 'I think it’s worth … some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights. That is a prudent deal. It is rational.' These are not the words of healing, not the words of unity. And yet they, too, are part of the ledger he leaves behind.
"So what do we do with a legacy like this? First, we tell the truth. We acknowledge what he said, how he said it, and the hurt it caused. Second, we resist the temptation to let violence beget violence. For if this act tells us anything, it is that political violence has become a siren call to the unhinged, a spark they would gladly use to ignite the tinderbox of racial and class resentment. Today it was a conservative voice silenced. Tomorrow, it could just as easily be a progressive one. We must not let this become the currency of politics."
Thinking Friend Kevin Heifner in Arkansas also sent a link to the Substack post of his friend Wendell Griffen, a Black man who is both a pastor and a circuit judge. He (Judge Griffen) is a man I have known of and respected for quite a number of years. Back in 2021 I read his book "The Fierce Urgency of Prophetic Hope." And how, thanks to Kevin's introduction of it, I am a subscriber (for free; sorry, Judge) to his Substack, found at https://wendellgriffen.substack.com.
ReplyDeleteGriffen's 9/17 post is titled, "The Right-Wing Enterprise to Re-Invent Charlie Kirk," and he concludes with these words:
"I denounce the despicable enterprise that Trump, Vance, Miller, Bondi, and other right-wing figures are mounting to censor, intimidate, and silence people who criticize what Kirk believed, said, and did. Trump, Vance, Miller, Bondi, and others are free to disagree with Kirk’s critics and detractors. They are not entitled to our deference nor our obedience.
"Charlie Kirk held, espoused, and made his fortune by trafficking views that were racist, sexist, xenophobic, homophobic, transphobic, and otherwise despicable. Count me among those who have the good sense to not be suckers for the right-wing propaganda enterprise to give him a post-mortem makeover."
And then not long after 10 a.m. in California where he lives, Thinking Friend John Tim Carr send this brief comment:
ReplyDelete"Great information, and I agree with the information you presented and the thoughtful way Al presented the information."